Reply With Quote
ChumpDumper still humping my leg and begging for attention
goldfish amplitude of consciousnessThese reports are explicitly about the DNC/DCCC hacks -- which you personally and thoroughly do ented as real.
you didn't even read the tweets you posted.
You're an even worse rube than before you swallowed this.
or the guile of appearing to be naive known as being coy
hard to say
TSA got grilled on his own Hibachi, not for the first time
It's right there in the email you posted, dip . DNC/DCCC hacks. You should read what you post.
You're getting more gullible every day.
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 08-14-2025 at 10:33 AM.
You're going to watch Trump bend over and take it straight up the ass from Putin tomorrow.
"a joint project related to Russian attribution and intent for the DNC/DCCC hacks"
TSA -
Russia just cyberattacked - USA Federal court systems....
Trumps reaction/response: "are you surprised? USA does it too!"
Now imagine Biden saying/responding that way to another russian cyberattack?
You would have walls and walls of faux outrage -
disgusting traitor....
Clapper is scrambling to get on CNN for another interview
It's astounding how stupid you have become, TSA.
Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election
Politics Aug 18, 2020 4:49 AM EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help.
The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin’s aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers.
The report is the culmination of a bipartisan probe that produced what the committee called “the most comprehensive description to date of Russia’s activities and the threat they posed.” The investigation spanned more than three years as the panel’s leaders said they wanted to thoroughly do ent the unprecedented attack on U.S. elections.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...16-us-election
Are you going to arrest Trump's Secretary of State/National Security Adviser/Archivist for his radical attack on whatever you think is a thing?
Russiagate Releases Lifting a Veil on Surveillance State Abuses
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s office released two damning emails yesterday, the first being a letter from former DNI James Clapper to former FBI head James Comey, former CIA head John Brennan, and then-NSA chief Michael Rogers. Dated December 22, 2016, Clapper’s letter explains how the chiefs should approach writing a new Intelligence Community Assessment, whose conclusion — that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump — had already been reported:
Mike John Jim;
Understand your concern. It is essential that we (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) be on the same page. and are all supportive of the report — in the highest tradition of “that’s OUR story, and we’re stickin’ to it.” This evening, CIA has provided to the NIC the complete draft generated by the ad hoc fusion cell. We will facilitate as much mutual transparency as possible as we complete the report, but, more time is not negotiable,” We may have to compromise on our “normal” modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed schedule.
This is one project that has to be a team sport.
Jim
Clapper’s email was in response to a note about “concerns” from Rogers, the NSA chief who never upgraded his agency’s confidence level in the “Russia did it for Trump” conclusion from “moderate” to high. The Rogers letter makes it clear that the head of the Pentagon’s most powerful surveillance agency was being asked to sign off on a conclusion without seeing the most “sensitive” intelligence. From Rogers:
"I asked my team if they’d had sufficient access to the underlying intelligence and sufficient time to review that intelligence. On both points my team raised concerns… I’m concerned that, given the expedited nature of this activity, my folks aren’t fully comfortable saying that they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments… I do want to make sure that, when we are asked in the future whether we can absolutely stand behind the paper… I’m concerned we are not there yet."
This is a devastating exchange. It shows that in assembling perhaps the most high-profile group analysis since the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq’s WMD program, four of America’s most powerful enforcement officials said, “To with evidence, let’s just put out a tale and stick with it.”
In the specific context of this scandal, it makes a joke of years of public narratives about Trump, Putin, and Russia. Along with more do ents funneled from Kash Patel’s FBI to Just The News asserting that senior Justice Department officials squashed Hillary Clinton corruption investigations, and that Comey gave a middleman access to highly classified information to help plead his case to newspapers like the New York Times, the new Gabbard docs further elucidate how years of Russia mania were built on fraud.
But this cascade of revelations is bringing a more disturbing story into focus. A subtext is the unnerving casualness with which procedural rules were broken. Even before Rogers and the NSA were asked to blindly bless a domestic political probe built in part atop “evidence” from an illegal FISA warrant, the FISA court had begun investigating misuse of the surveillance program. Onetime Trump aide Carter Page is not the only American in a politically sensitive position recently monitored under this dubious legal end-around. There was FISA monitoring of campaign manager Paul Manafort, “non-compliant” use of FISA to investigate the January 6th Capitol breach, even FISA tracking of ordinary Americans overseas applying for benefits.
In the coming weeks you’ll be reading (at Racket, among other places) about wholesale abuse of other surveillance programs. It turns out an alarming number of senior Trump campaign officials from the 2024 cycle were notified about prior FBI surveillance (news about Kash Patel, Dan Scavino, and Jeff Clark receiving such notices has already broken, but more names are coming). Widespread surveillance of congressional officials in a 2017 leak probe was the underlying context of recent revelations suggesting two members, Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell, approved leaks of classified information.
The legacy press is ignoring the releases both because they paint Donald Trump as a victim of overreach and because the press played such a prominent role in the Russiagate corruption. They’re betraying audiences who might be concerned about the larger pattern coming into relief. That story is about intelligence agencies meddling in domestic politics at all — Trump or no Trump — through a list of forbidden practices. We’re about to find out that far more people in the political world were under routine surveillance than previously thought, including mainstream and independent reporters who communicated with political sources of all stripes.
https://www.racket.news/p/russiagate...lifting-a-veil
Russia interfered with the 2016 election in favor of Trump. It has been proved over and over again -- even by Republicans.
This sure made you forget about Trump's hiding the Epstein files and freeing a pedophile tho.
And that was the entire point.
Where's the propaganda?
It's a 1000 page report.
Show us what you, TSA, think is garbage in the report.
Fever tweets don't count.
Where are the EPSTEIN files?
Russia gate crew not even embarrassed
About what?
Be specific.
You're existence is sad. Like WH. Later
TSA -- nothing you post will ever change their minds. They got suckered on Russiagate and will double and triple down on it. Why waste your time?
After all, this a therapeutic place for lib s to vent.
Your cult leader said, in public, “russia, if you are listening….i hope you can attack one of our usa citizens and find those emails…”
5 hours later, russia complied and hacked servers….
in public…which any american with functioning eyes and ears could witness for themselves without any media outlet convincing them either way…
helsinki…again…its on video…trump took the side of russia/putin against his own usa intel- and OUR usa intel…
again…any american with functioning eyes and ears could witness this by just pulling out that youtube video…
a us president committing treason in public and if you still support him- that says everything about you and your patriotism…
jan 6- on live tv- the entire planet witness a us president committing treason and doing nothing for 3 hours as his own govt he swore an oath to
was attacked with people saying live on tv that they were sent there by trump- your own eyes and ears witnessed this
and here you are - calling things you witnessed with your own eyes and ears- a “hoax” and “russiagate”
you got serious issues
Exhibit A
You'll have to tell us, in your own words, what you're talking about.
I'm going to assume you're just falling for the same stupid TSAnon is trying to make happen.
I can explain where you have been taken advantage of by people who are counting on an emotional response from you.
You won't even try.
Darrin doesn't even know what he's talking about -- pure handwaving
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
