Reply With Quote
fake 911 calls
base ratf*ckery
https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/vide...lse-911-calls/
You are Bouts... Well, Bouts 2.0!
fake 911 calls
base ratf*ckery
https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/vide...lse-911-calls/
You really want to beat up women.
Abusing women is a perquisite of conventional paternalism
ah, the good old days
Trump appointed judge reportedly issues a TRO forbidding deployment of National Guard to Portland, can't find it online yet
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/loc...8-185e8c7e1b79A federal judge has issued a ruling on Oregon's lawsuit challenging the federal deployment of the state's National Guard to Portland. U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut granted the state's motion for a temporary restraining order over President Donald Trump's order to deploy 200 National Guard troops to the city.
ah, here it is
likely to succeed on 10th Amendment and ultra vires
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...270.56.0_1.pdf
But what if Trump reeeeeeealy wants to do it?
basically, trump declared a bull emergency in Oregon
the judge heard both sides and called bull on Trump
who knows, let him defy the law openly
weekend and late-night court judgments used to be less frequent, right?
Last edited by Winehole23; 10-04-2025 at 07:20 PM. Reason: "judgments" in American English
You leftists are ing as re ed as it gets. It's hilarious seeing yall re s jump to asinine conclusions to smear those yall dislike. Keep pretending you ing dumb s!
you're the one who was fantasizing about beating womenYou leftists are ing as re ed as it gets. It's hilarious seeing yall re s jump to asinine conclusions to smear those yall dislike. Keep pretending you ing dumb s!
lmao "fantasizing"... STFU already re . You and Brooke are dumb as . SMDH
But you said you would compulsively beat women were the location correct.
What else are we supposed to conclude?
You're an idiot WH. You might as well be in those "protests" out there in portland with the other re s.
Would you try to beat him up for existing?
I'm good here in south central Texas, thanks for your concern!
crystal
Trump appointed Judge Immergut
Will Trumplandia live by her decision?
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...270.56.0_1.pdfIMMERGUT, District Judge. This case involves the intersection of three of the most fundamental principles in our cons utional democracy. The first concerns the relationship between the federal government and the states. The second concerns the relationship between the United States armed forces and domestic law enforcement. The third concerns the proper role of the judicial branch in ensuring that the executive branch complies with the laws and limitations imposed by the legislative branch. Whether we choose to follow what the Cons ution mandates with respect to these three relationships goes to the heart of what it means to live under the rule of law in the United States.
(background: DOJ swayed Judge Immergut's predecessor to recuse himself because his wife is a liberal legislator)
,
"this is a nation of Cons utional law, not martial law. Defendants have made a range of arguments that, if accepted, risk blurring the line between civil and military federal power—to the detriment of this nation."
Judge Immergut quotes James Madison from the Records of the Federal Convention of 1787: “A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defence [against] foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
