Reply With Quote
They'll never apologize
You'll never apologize for the arrests of legals. You're a sorry racist, tbh.
They'll never apologize
of course not, posting is the party style
They'll never apologize
Vladeck thinks the Trump v Illinois lawsuit is make or break
https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/184-t...kes-of-trump-vAs I wrote in an op-ed earlier this month, the real questions in these cases are not about the federal government’s (broad) legal authorities; they’re about the facts. And the absolute last place the Supreme Court should be re-litigating the facts is in the truncated, compressed frenzy of resolving an emergency application. If the justices really want to look at this case closely, they should grant certiorari before judgment and take full briefing and argument before doing anything to upset the status quo. Otherwise, the Court would be greenlighting pretextual (if not abusive) domestic deployments of the military—whether temporarily (if the justices think they might ultimately rule against the Trump administration on the merits), or … not.
If that’s not a red line for this Court, it’s hard to imagine what would be.
DHS is violating a consent decree in Illinois, ICE officers may now now face prosecution for continuing to break it
https://migrantinsider.com/p/ice-age...be-arrested-inU.S. District Judge Jeffrey mings found that ICE agents violated the terms of a consent decree by detaining people without proper warrants, following a surge in such arrests amid increased enforcement activity. According to the judge’s order, ICE agents must now wear body cameras and have them turned on. They also cannot arrest anyone complying with their appointment dates at immigration courthouses.
The latest order expands protections for immigrants, mandating rigorous reporting and retraining requirements for agents and creating court-backed avenues for legal consequences—including possible arrest—for those found violating the judge’s directive
shoddy police work and lies are bollixing DOJ's prosecution of Chicagoans
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/m...age-dismissalsFederal prosecutors charged Oak Park, Illinois resident Cole Sheridan on October 4 with assaulting, impeding, or resisting a federal agent over a situation that took place outside an ICE facility in suburban Chicago. In an affidavit attached to the complaint, a Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agent alleged that Sheridan pushed Border Patrol officers during an Oct. 3 protest.
At a hearing last week, however, that account was called into question. Bovino, the flashy CBP commander, was involved in the arrest; per a federal official at the hearing, he was not wearing a body cam during the incident.
That lack of video prompted open skepticism from the judge.
“Without video of the actual physical exchange … there is only the evidence of the hearsay statement of Bovino,” Magistrate Judge Heather K. McShain reportedly said. McShain found that there was no probable cause to support the “assault” portion of the charge, per an order. The magistrate allowed other portions of the charge, including resisting a federal agent, to move forward.
Air Force veteran Dana Briggs, 70, was charged on Sept. 29 via criminal complaint with a felony count of assaulting a federal officer at a protest. The affidavit, made by a Homeland Security Investigations special agent, cited YouTube videos in alleging that Briggs had swung his arm at a Border Patrol officer, and said that other officers had been wearing their cameras at the time.
Days later, federal prosecutors moved to dismiss the initial complaint and replace it with a misdemeanor. That charge omitted the assault allegation.
The reversal prompted the magistrate in the case, Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes, to ask to review the same videos on which the initial affidavit was based, saying in an order that the sworn affirmation had been “a substantial part of the basis for the Court’s initial determination of probable cause on the complaint.”
Magistrate Judge Fuentes has had two other Midway Blitz cases end after prosecutors declined to support claims made in the initial affidavit. Federal prosecutors charged Hubert Mazur via criminal complaint with a misdemeanor charge of resisting a federal officer. An FBI special agent wrote that after a Border Patrol agent pushed Mazur back, the two fell to the ground.
Days later, prosecutors moved to dismiss the case. At a hearing, government attorneys said that a review of additional body-worn camera footage prompted the decision. Judge Fuentes had prosecutors confirm, according to a minute order, that the FBI agent had sworn under oath that he had reviewed video evidence, and that that affirmation is what prompted the judge to find probable cause.
Paul Ivery was charged on Sept. 28 with felony assault of a federal officer. An HSI agent alleged in an affidavit that Ivery shouted, “I’ll ing kill you right now” at Border Patrol officers. He then ran away and grabbed an agent’s helmet as he was being arrested, the affidavit said, citing body-worn camera footage.
Prosecutors dropped that case last week and Fuentes put down the same record in an order: he only found probable cause because the affidavit cited video evidence.
Other resisting federal officer cases against Chicago protesters have also fallen short.
One, filed against a couple that ICE accused of being “armed rioters,” was dismissed after a grand jury declined to indict. Marimar Martinez, a 30-year-old Chicago resident and teacher, was accused in a DHS press release of being a “domestic terrorist” and of ramming a government SUV while armed. An affidavit filed in her case said that Martinez’s car “drove into and side-swiped” a CBP car, and contradicts the DHS press release on a few points: there were only two cars in the convoy, according to the affidavit, not ten, as DHS claimed. A CBP officer purportedly shot Martinez multiple times during the episode.
Body-worn camera footage undermined the government’s account there, her attorney has said. Instead, video shows that she shouted “la migra” while driving alongside immigration enforcement in Chicago, her attorney told the Chicago Sun-Times. As she shouted the warning about ICE’s presence, a CBP agent purportedly shouted, “do something, ,” before firing at her. The government later allowed the agent to drive the car back to his home in Maine, per a court hearing in the case.
That episode attracted national attention. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) asked DHS Secretary Kristi Noem about it in a Thursday letter, demanding body camera footage and to know how Laura Loomer apparently received photos from the scene.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois did not return requests for comment.
Last edited by Winehole23; 10-20-2025 at 05:34 PM.
detaining random Chicagoans "who look like" who they're looking for, threatening lawyers who merely ask questions
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...e-club-v-noem/
Every time I get detained at the checkpoint before the valley I don't and moan about it. All you do is cry here on ST bro, your life is posting bs articles and crying foul endlessly about a whole lot of nothing. ing pathetic!
oh, so you think all this is not happening?
I thought you wanted it to happen?
Show me where I said this or that isn't happening or is this more make believe by re WH who thinks men can be women.oh, so you think all this is not happening?
I thought you wanted it to happen?
Who's feigning now
You, forever! Re !
You don't get detained you sissy idiot.
hundreds turn out in a downstate town of 5,000 people in support of a local restauranteur
what's the social benefit of uprooting this guy and tearing his American family apart?
https://www.thetelegraph.com/news/ar...l-21134417.phpHundreds of protestors lined Main Street in Staunton, with “Bring Him Home” as their main rallying cry, during an event Sunday in support of local restaurant owner Ismael Sandoval.
Sandoval was taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents on Wednesday.
After a brief rally at Staunton's Route 66 Park, attendees marched a block up Main Street to Sandoval’s restaurant, Caldera Bar & Grill, for another short rally that included a brief speech by one of his daughters, Amy Sandoval, who said she wanted her father “out of that terrible place” and back with his family.
Ismael Sandoval has been a long-time fixture in the Staunton community. A Staunton resident for about two decades, he had just taken his two daughters to school Wednesday morning when ICE agents took him into custody within sight of several parents. Staunton School District officials said it was not on school property.
"Are you a citizen?"
"Yes"
"Move along"
Poor Kori has to suffer through that every time.
Is he an illegal alien? Buh-bye!
You have no clue what you're talking about BlaKKKe because you don't have nor have you been in a position where the state was corrupt against you, I have. You're a simpleton and so is your eGF Brooke, two dumb mother ers who think the interwebs are real life.
You ooze made, bro.
And I have been DETAINED at a border check before, all my tattoo supplies dumped on the road by BP, and my car x-rayed with a huge van only to come up empty handed. Brooke and BlaKKKe speak from no real life experience and it shows.
You two should make a suicide pact already and do your families and us here a favor, BlaKKKe and BrookKKe.
this is from an unredacted version of a court filing obtained by
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:gx3...czyr5fs3lyiv2g, a Chicago Tribune reporter
Body cams apparently show Border Patrol agents joking about tossing tear gas at a nonviolent protest, with one agent saying "Hey, throw it [tear gas] for fun."
Agents then tried to drive away, but there was apparently so much tear gas they were overcome, couldn't drive, and had to leave on foot.
everything the Nazis did was legal when they did it
there will be a reckoning for the obscene inhumanity and lawlessness of enforcement
Illinois fights back
dailynorthwestern.com/2025/11/03/c...The Illinois legislature had passed the “Illinois Bivens Act,” allowing people to sue ICE agents in state court. Just waiting for Pritzker’s signature.
Same with all "Socialist" authoritarians.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
