Reply With Quote
the allegation that Trump spent hours with a victim at Epstein's house after he was a known sex offender seems to warrant scrutiny, don't you think?
if you read through the thread, you'll see I posted many of these right off the bat, quite independently of Politico
"tRuMp iS mEnTiOnEd 1000 tImEs"
Yet he couldn't even crack Politico's list of the most shocking revelations
the allegation that Trump spent hours with a victim at Epstein's house after he was a known sex offender seems to warrant scrutiny, don't you think?
Link it. I'll scrutinize it.
What makes you think it hasn't already been scrutinized and bent 7 ways to Sunday for Democrats to try and implicate Trump in wrongdoing vis a' vis Epstein? None of these revelations are new to the Democrats that held office prior to Trump.
the email is posted multiply in this thread, but here you go:
I think that Trump associating socially with a known sex trafficker is politically damning all by itself, there's no need to prove anything else to make up one's mind about him
"tRuMp iS mEnTiOnEd 1000 tImEs"
Yet he couldn't even crack Politico's list of the most shocking revelations
YOU fall for it EVERY SINGLE TIME.
Also pimping a top ten list from Politico?
(Maxwell seems to have changed her tune on whether Trump "knew about the girls")
Compelling. No evidence of a crime and if mere association or allegation were enough, you'd be as critical of Joe "showered with my daughter" and "I like to sniff little girls' hair" Biden or Bill "I groped Kathleen Willy and Raped Juanita Broaddrick" Clinton. Sorry, an email from a pedophile to his provider, 6 years after a public falling out between him and Trump, after which there is little evidence of a continued relationship, isn't convincing.
But, you've made up your mind. So, go with it. Me, I want irrefutable evidence of a crime before I'll believe anything other than Democrats have tried scuttle Trump's political career since 2016 - all while having access to these files - and never used it. If you can explain that; I'll listen.
Honestly, Trump s: you're doing so many backflips to avoid the simple truth that Trump continues to hide the Epstein files he can release at any second.
He also tried to beg/bribe/coerce Republican women into help him hide the Epstein files from you.
Why is he doing this to you?
To whom are you whispering?
that's what's called a theatrical aside, it's directed to the whole audience
(probably about five or ten people)
Your double standard is duly noted.
I can absolutely explain why files were not released before now: Legal actions against Epstein and Maxwell. Maxwell in particular just exhausted her final appeal. There was absolutely no way anything was going to be released during a prosecution.
But you wouldn't know anything about proper procedure.
I don't think you need proof to a legal certainty to decide for oneself, or as a political party, that someone is unfit to serve
I get that that's the bar for y'all since y'all ditched honor and morality, the dishonor and shame your representatives bring by word or deed are tolerated merely to cling to power
Last edited by Winehole23; 11-13-2025 at 04:05 PM.
You don't need anything to decide for oneself. Have at it.
I've decided, for myself, that after all that has been thrown at Trump since he descended the escalator on July 16, 2015 to officially launch his first presidential bid, if guilt in the Epstein case was among his problems, the Democrats would have splashed that all over the place.
So, show me something irrefutable and I'll listen.
You're so skeptical you'll disbelieve everything but the irrefutable
So much for honor and morality
No you won't.
You showed us nothing irrefutable for your claims about Democrats.
When it comes to Trump and the lengths to which his opposition has gone to bring him down. Absolutely. Particularly when his opposition has had access to everything you've been harping on for years.You're so skeptical you'll disbelieve everything but the irrefutable
So much for honor and reputation
Trump has access to it now and is hiding it from you.
Why?
You guys keep it up. It's going great.
https://x.com/ProjectLincoln/status/1989045760495694135
what is a political opposition for?
y'all wanted to bring Biden and Obama down, I honestly don't see the problem here
(beside hurt feelings about it)
Why did trump spend hours alone with one of the child victims of sex abuse, pedophilia?
Was he mentoring her?
Getting a massage from her?
Giving her piano lessons?
Discussing the bible with her?
Why was trump - who had already denied - being in the presence of any of the victims, in epsteins house, on the plane (the same epstein plane trump used during the trial where he was convicted of 34 Felonies) in Epsteins house...
with a victim?
Tsa firing off a copium jpg and hitting his February self that started this thread.
"tRuMp iS mEnTiOnEd 1000 tImEs"
Yet he couldn't even crack Politico's list of the most shocking revelations
Will never answer. Never.
Well, the difference being, Hillary Clinton's political opponent (Trump) didn't pay someone to fabricate a dossier the intelligence community and media then used to try and impeach her. The difference being, Biden didn't have several government prosecutors campaigning for their jobs with the singular objective to "get Hillary." The difference being, No one tried to assassinate Hillary or Joe. The difference being, no prosecutor changed or manipulated existing law in order to win a 32 count indictment against Hillary or Joe. (As an aside, you do realize how silly it looks for people to claim his 32 time felon). The difference being, the Right has relied on argument to persuade people to vote against the opposition - not lies and fabricated crimes or attempted assassinations.
It's a big difference.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions