Reply With Quote
And scuttle the Maxwell prosecution?
Unrealistic tbh.
Anyway, why is your Trump fighting so hard to hide his Epstein files?
Please explain since you have everything figured out.
leaving aside for a moment your hilarious gullibility, what about all the men and women in the files not named Trump and Clinton?
why protect all of them?
Last edited by Winehole23; 12-22-2025 at 12:22 AM.
And scuttle the Maxwell prosecution?
Unrealistic tbh.
Anyway, why is your Trump fighting so hard to hide his Epstein files?
Please explain since you have everything figured out.
Well if we're going to believe news from anyone....
https://x.com/jkbjournalist/status/2003164183383425497
Apparently there's a simple pdf exploit that unredacts some of the files -- just copy/paste the redacted text into a new notebook
https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/com..._look_at_this/
amateur hour at DOJ
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/1...tment-00704265Tens of thousands of do ents that appeared to be from the Epstein files were briefly posted on the Justice Department’s website Monday before disappearing without explanation.
The do ents reviewed by POLITICO were available to download through a Justice.gov link early Monday afternoon and remained available for several hours. The link was not visible on the Justice Department’s website where officials have been posting do ents from the files it is required to disclose under a law passed by Congress last month. But the URL corresponded with an anticipated eighth “dataset” of do ents that officials were expected to release.
That dataset appeared to be next in the sequence of do ents that the Justice Department began releasing on Friday pertaining to the decades-long investigation and prosecution of the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell for a sprawling sex trafficking operation
Justice Department spokespeople didn’t respond to POLITICO’s requests for comment on the new do ents. The material included tens of thousands of government do ents and emails, as well as several dozen videos from the Bureau of Prisons.
The materials describe 2008 negotiations between the Justice Department and lawyers for Epstein as he attempted to settle claims that he trafficked girls. They include internal 2019 deliberations by the Justice Department and federal prosecutors in New York as they neared criminal charges against Epstein over his trafficking ring.
The records show prosecutors’ attempts to trace Epstein’s vast financial empire and far-flung properties, his ties to prominent financial industry executives and records of investigators’ efforts to track the movements of Epstein and Maxwell. They also catalogue the internal deliberations of Justice Department officials — whose iden ies are largely redacted — as they dealt with the internal demands and pressures from superiors related to the Epstein probe.
And they show how prosecutors pivoted from the shock of Epstein’s 2019 suicide in jail while he awaited trial to pursuing his co-conspirators.
"many more times"
Trump wanting to take over Epstein's extortion racket can't be ruled out
After Epstein’s August, 2019 death, prosecutors produced a seven-page memo on co-conspirators they might consider charging and followed that with an 86-page update in December, according to the files. They also produced a 13-page memo of corporate prosecutions they might pursue and a 26-page memo regarding another target prosecutors considered pursuing.
Only references to the memos — not the do ents themselves — appeared in the tranche temporarily published Monday. If eventually made public, the memos could show the calculations prosecutors made about whether to charge people associated with the sex-trafficking operation.
Prosecutors ultimately charged only Epstein and Maxwell.
h/t, @mmasnick.bsky.social
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/C...xhibit%201.pdf
Anyway, curious what possible rationale the DOJ could have for redacting those sections saying that Epstein paid off witnesses to their "criminal sex trafficking and abuse conduct," threatened harm, to "release damaging stories about them," and telling them to "destroy evidence."
they keep releasing old stuff
web.archive.org/web/20230920...This do ent, with the bad redactions, seems to have been around for a few years. Here’s an Archive.org copy from 2023.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...chase-bank-na/
bsky dumpster
Why is Trump's DOJ covering all this up, Darrin?
Please explain.
I'll put you down for "no information disputed"
Trump wants to protect powerful pedos, for some reason
Maybe he wants them to owe him a favor
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-o...nkId=892223801"I don't like the pictures of Bill Clinton being shown. I don't like the pictures of other people being shown. I think it's a terrible thing," the president told reporters. "I think Bill Clinton's a big boy, he can handle it. But you probably have pictures being exposed of other people that innocently met Jeffrey Epstein years ago ... and they're highly respected bankers and lawyers and others."
The president said Epstein was "all over Palm Beach" and many people crossed paths with him.
"A lot of people are very angry that pictures are being released of other people that really had nothing to do with Epstein, but they're in a picture with him because he was at a party, and you ruin a reputation of somebody," Mr. Trump said Monday at his Mar-a-Lago estate.
DarrinS es about my links, but never posts primary sources
It's hard to recall any frequent poster here who ever had less to say about politics
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-...ta-set-8-filesIn view of the Congressional deadline, all reasonable efforts have been made to review and redact personal information pertaining to victims, other private individuals, and protect sensitive materials from disclosure. That said, because of the volume of information involved, this website may nevertheless contain information that inadvertently includes non-public personally identifiable information or other sensitive content, to include matters of a sexual nature. In the event a member of the public identifies any information that should not have been posted, please notify us immediately at [email protected] so we can take steps to correct the problem as soon as possible.
DOJ fails to redact victim's name
https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/22/polit...les-redactionsA Jeffrey Epstein survivor who has only ever chosen to identify herself anonymously as “Jane Doe” was startled to learn that her name appeared multiple times in the Justice Department’s release of the Epstein files that began on Friday, and she told CNN in an exclusive interview Monday that her attempts to get the DOJ to redact her name from the publicly available do ents had been unsuccessful so far.
Jane Doe said she both witnessed and experienced Epstein’s abuse in 2009 and reported her experience to the FBI the same year. That time frame is particularly significant, because it was after Epstein pleaded guilty to two state pros ution charges in Florida in the aftermath of receiving a non-prosecution deal with federal prosecutors.
DOJ protecting Republicans
DOJ doing peekaboo posting is a motif
Former Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers was once designated as a successor executor in convicted sex offender Jeffrey E. Epstein’s will, positioning him to oversee Epstein’s estate if the primary executors were unable or unwilling to serve, according to a copy disclosed by the Department of Justice on Monday.
The will, which was signed in November 2014, was one of more than 6,000 files that appeared briefly on the Department of Justice’s website as part of an additional tranche of Epstein-related records, before being removed.
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2...-epstein-will/The Justice Department has not confirmed the cir stances under which the do ent was posted or removed, and a spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
releasing fake do ents to discredit their own do ent dump?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...show-rcna87400
insane stuff being released today
Palm Beach police threatened to lay charges against victims, who then became uncooperative with Epstein investigators
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/file...TA00009502.pdf
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
