Reply With Quote
You already came to your conclusion as soon as you found out ICE shot someone
LOOK OUT SHE'S GOT A SOCCER MOM SUV!
SHOOT TO KILL!
BETTER TO BE JUDGED BY 12 THAN CARRIED BY 6!!
You already came to your conclusion as soon as you found out ICE shot someone
You mean the masked men in unmarked vehicles.
How is the ICE agent doing? Is he recovering from his injuries?
ICE is responsible for the *only* shooting and homicide in Minneapolis so far in 2026.
I'd argue the driver of that Honda Pilot is responsible and, vicariously, the Governor of Minnesota for fomenting the insurrectionist behavior exhibited by the driver.
Why is it terrifying for the children? How do they even know what's going on outside the Day Care?
Beside, were there even any children there?
Tiny detail most missed: The ICE nazi WALKED in front of the vehicle. The driver didnt point her vehicle and tried to run down anyone. The ice kunt walked in front of the car.
least possible charge: VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER
max charge : MURDER
The only cases where a cop has a possible defense needs many factors to be able to succeed. Some are: the cop had knowledge that the driver was a felon fleeing the police …a felon/murderer/serial killer, etc who had already killed people and was armed or shooting at police, etc
a killer fleeing and then gunning the accelerator to run over a cop or other people…
sometimes a cop was able to testify in court the old, “at this point the driver used the car as a weapon and having no other recourse, knowing this was an armed murderer, just escaped from prison…so i drew my weapon and in fear for my life…blah blah..i opened fire to save my life and other people nearby blah blah…”
sometimes in those cases…the jury will examine all those details and more and examine the officers record, his testimony, his previous record, who the driver was and video -if any- witnesses testimony, etc…sometimes this defense succeeds…
but not here…not …
in this case…here- a jury and a judge will focus on the driver being an unarmed innocent citizen who might or might not have been terrified at the masked men approaching her car and yelling expletives and simply chose to leave the scene…at this point the ice kunt walked in front of her vehicle and opened fire on her for no real reason since she had broken zero laws and had zero criminal record…and was basically just choosing to leave the scene just as the prior vehicle shown in the videos had left right before she attempted to follow in the same direction as the previous vehicle…
ice nazi appears to have murdered an innocent civilian and at the very least this should happen:
kristi noem should immediately produce this ice suspect goon to a court/judge for arraignment or if she fails to do so - should be arraigned herself for shielding a known suspect whom the world witnessed murdering an unarmed civilian.
facts.
Blake Cramer
One last detail…
a jury would also ask:
was this a case where if the officer did NOT shoot- the driver could get away and kill more people?
or
was this a case where the driver was not really a threat to others and could easily be arrested later by police?
they would see that the officer in this case was never touched by vehicle, never thrown off his feet, never really endangered and even walked normally towards the wrecked vehicle and dead victim after killing her…
(despite the lies by the biggest lying liar on the planet)
Lol bootlick
impeachment
stop the lawlessness
https://robinkelly.house.gov/media-c...ry-kristi-noemToday, U.S. Rep. Robin Kelly (IL-02) announced plans to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem following the fatal shooting by an ICE officer in Minneapolis.
“Secretary Kristi Noem is an incompetent leader, a disgrace to our democracy, and I am impeaching her for obstruction of justice, violation of public trust, and self-dealing. Secretary Noem wreaked havoc in the Chicagoland area, and now, her rogue ICE agents have unleashed that same destruction in Minneapolis, fatally shooting Renee Nicole Good,” said Rep. Kelly. “From Chicago to Charlotte to Los Angeles to Minneapolis, Secretary Noem is violating the Cons ution while ruining—and ending—lives, and separating families. It’s one thing to be incompetent and dangerous, but it’s impeachable to break the rule of law. I told my cons uents and Chicagoans that I would fight against Secretary Noem’s agenda. This is me fighting back.”
Rep. Kelly will file three articles of impeachment against Secretary Noem:
- Obstruction of Congress: Secretary Noem willfully obstructed Congressional oversight and withheld Congressionally appropriated funds in violation of her cons utional oath and federal law.
- Violation of Public Trust: Secretary Noem compromised public safety, violated due process of American citizens, and directed uncons utional actions.
- Self-Dealing: Secretary Noem abused her office for personal benefit and steered federal dollars to associates.
Does that really look like an intent to kill someone to you? Don't lie.
not agreeing that's the case, but is it not allowed to be a commie cosplayer?
slaying people for beliefs now?
Yeah, none of that justifies the secret police breaking their own regulations to murder a white mother.
Last edited by Blake; 01-07-2026 at 08:58 PM.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/t...ago-protestorsIn the case of Marimar Martinez, the 30-year old Chicagoan shot five times in October by a Border Patrol officer, DHS officials accused her of being part of a convoy of “10 cars” that “rammed” and “boxed” agents in. Those allegations were contradicted by an affidavit filed by federal agents in the case and evidence that was introduced later.
The motion to drop the charges against Martinez and Anthony Ian Santos Ruiz, another protester, comes at a critical time in the case.
Text messages from the Border Patrol officer involved in the shooting, Charles Exum, appeared to show him bragging about the incident. “Read it … I fired 5 shots and she had 7 holes. Put that in your book boys,” one text from Exum read.
Attorneys for Martinez had planned to discuss more text messages they received from officers involved in the shooting at a hearing scheduled for Thursday afternoon. The judge in the case had reviewed the texts in her chambers before ordering them released.
Prosecutors moved to dismiss the case hours before the hearing.
DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin struck a completely different tone, doubling down in calling Martinez a “domestic terrorist” and accusing her of participating in an ambush. McLaughlin lauded federal agents for “incredible restraint and prudence in their exercise of force.”
“For questions on charges, we refer you to the DOJ,” she added.
Her belief was that she could FA and not FOnot agreeing that's the case, but is it not allowed to be a commie cosplayer?
slaying people for beliefs now?
lol backpedalling, you're such a wuss on an anonymous board
Doesn’t matter Cramer.
“One more time -- once she directed her vehicle in the direction of the officer in front of her, that was "assault on a law enforcement officer with a deadly or dangerous instrument." It does not matter if she hit him or he evaded her.
That fact -- without more -- made her at threat to the safety of the community if she was able to drive away. If she'll run over and officer in marked clothing giving her a lawful order to stop her vehicle, then the law presumes she will run over a citizen too if necessary.
Use of deadly force is authorized to neutralized a threat to the community, i.e., preventing her from driving away.
You may not like the law, but that is the state of the law. It has developed over dozens of cases all with multiple factual barriers.
Pointing her car at the officer and starting forward was no different legally from pointing a gun at him and firing. The fact that the shooter misses is irrelevant.”
Undoubtedly, if it is reasonable to construe the woman’s action as a deliberate attempt to mow down an ICE agent with a speeding vehicle, the use of force was justified. But even if the woman was mainly trying to get away (which is what it looks like to me), she was engaged in an actionable assault on a federal officer, a felony under Section 111 of the federal penal code.
One of my first cases as a young prosecutor was an assault on a federal officer — a probation officer. The defendant was convicted even though he never actually struck the officer; he just clenched his fist and assumed an offensive stance, suggesting an imminent swing.
That was sufficient beyond a reasonable doubt because the statute targets anyone who “forcibly assaults, resists, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with” a federal officer. To cons ute assault, there need not be battery; and here, the statutory language reaches conduct less serious than assault. If the agent is put in reasonable fear of imminent harm, that’s enough.
In fact, in this instance — unlike in my case all those years ago — if the assault or intimidation is carried out with “a deadly or dangerous weapon,” the penalty is up to 20 years’ imprisonment. That’s a weighty felony offense.
Even if you believe, as I’m inclined to believe based on what we’ve seen so far, that the woman was just trying to get away, she did so by swiping the car in the agent’s direction. She may not have intended to run him over, but she sure didn’t appear to be trying to avoid running him over if that was necessary to escape.
Either way, the agent’s life was jeopardized, and the responsive use of force would be reasonable. It is settled Fourth Amendment law that a police officer may use deadly force against a fleeing suspect if he has a good-faith belief that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. (See, e.g., Tennessee v. Gardner (1985).) Here, I believe the driver was in the act of committing a dangerous assault when the agent opened fire. And the driver’s reckless operation of the vehicle, coupled with the fact that she was heedless of harming armed law enforcement agents as they were carrying out their official duties, underscores that it was reasonable to believe she posed a serious threat to the agents and others.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...-ice-shooting/
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
