Minneapolis: US citizen shot in the face "three, four times" by ICE

**Yonivore** · 01-07-2026

lol backpedalling, you're such a wuss on an anonymous board

There's also evidence she had been following ICE all over town. Why didn't she just go home and love her children? Incidentally, why was her wife outside the vehicle at the time of the confrontation? Was she just going to leave her behind?

**Winehole23** · 01-07-2026

It's not a crime to observe public servants in public

**Blake** · 01-07-2026

Originally Posted by TSA

Doesn’t matter Cramer.

Pussy response, then the text wall. You're really a re ed pussy, pizza.

**Blake** · 01-07-2026

Originally Posted by Yonivore

There's also evidence she had been following ICE all over town. Why didn't she just go home and love her children? Incidentally, why was her wife outside the vehicle at the time of the confrontation? Was she just going to leave her behind?

Looks to me maybe she was trying to go home. The ICE agent made sure she didn't get to.

**Yonivore** · 01-07-2026

Originally Posted by Winehole23

It's not a crime to observe public servants in public

It is a crime to try and run them over.

I'm just dispensing with the nonsensical notion this woman just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and had no idea the officers approaching her vehicle were law enforcement.

**Winehole23** · 01-07-2026

DHS's off the rails violence has made Minneapolis too dangerous for children to go to school

**SnakeBoy** · 01-08-2026

Hope libs burn that lib hole down

**ChumpDumper** · 01-08-2026

Originally Posted by TSA

Doesn’t matter Cramer.

“One more time -- once she directed her vehicle in the direction of the officer in front of her, that was "assault on a law enforcement officer with a deadly or dangerous instrument." It does not matter if she hit him or he evaded her.

That fact -- without more -- made her at threat to the safety of the community if she was able to drive away. If she'll run over and officer in marked clothing giving her a lawful order to stop her vehicle, then the law presumes she will run over a citizen too if necessary.

Use of deadly force is authorized to neutralized a threat to the community, i.e., preventing her from driving away.

You may not like the law, but that is the state of the law. It has developed over dozens of cases all with multiple factual barriers.

Pointing her car at the officer and starting forward was no different legally from pointing a gun at him and firing. The fact that the shooter misses is irrelevant.”

Undoubtedly, if it is reasonable to construe the woman’s action as a deliberate attempt to mow down an ICE agent with a speeding vehicle, the use of force was justified. But even if the woman was mainly trying to get away (which is what it looks like to me), she was engaged in an actionable assault on a federal officer, a felony under Section 111 of the federal penal code.

One of my first cases as a young prosecutor was an assault on a federal officer — a probation officer. The defendant was convicted even though he never actually struck the officer; he just clenched his fist and assumed an offensive stance, suggesting an imminent swing.

That was sufficient beyond a reasonable doubt because the statute targets anyone who “forcibly assaults, resists, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with” a federal officer. To cons ute assault, there need not be battery; and here, the statutory language reaches conduct less serious than assault. If the agent is put in reasonable fear of imminent harm, that’s enough.

In fact, in this instance — unlike in my case all those years ago — if the assault or intimidation is carried out with “a deadly or dangerous weapon,” the penalty is up to 20 years’ imprisonment. That’s a weighty felony offense.

Even if you believe, as I’m inclined to believe based on what we’ve seen so far, that the woman was just trying to get away, she did so by swiping the car in the agent’s direction. She may not have intended to run him over, but she sure didn’t appear to be trying to avoid running him over if that was necessary to escape.

Either way, the agent’s life was jeopardized, and the responsive use of force would be reasonable. It is settled Fourth Amendment law that a police officer may use deadly force against a fleeing suspect if he has a good-faith belief that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. (See, e.g., Tennessee v. Gardner (1985).) Here, I believe the driver was in the act of committing a dangerous assault when the agent opened fire. And the driver’s reckless operation of the vehicle, coupled with the fact that she was heedless of harming armed law enforcement agents as they were carrying out their official duties, underscores that it was reasonable to believe she posed a serious threat to the agents and others.

https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...-ice-shooting/

Sorry, that's not the regulations the secret police are bound to follow.

**ChumpDumper** · 01-08-2026

Originally Posted by Yonivore

There's also evidence she had been following ICE all over town. Why didn't she just go home and love her children? Incidentally, why was her wife outside the vehicle at the time of the confrontation? Was she just going to leave her behind?

Why not just let her go home and love her children?

Did they have to murder her and leave her children behind?

**ChumpDumper** · 01-08-2026

Originally Posted by Yonivore

It is a crime to try and run them over.

She wasn't.

I'm just dispensing with the nonsensical notion this woman just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and had no idea the officers approaching her vehicle were law enforcement.

It is the wrong place at the wrong time when murderous secret police get horny to murder.

**ChumpDumper** · 01-08-2026

Originally Posted by SnakeBoy

Hope libs burn that lib hole down

Why do you hope that, snacks?

Please explain your glee at this murder.

**Winehole23** · 01-08-2026

**Winehole23** · 01-08-2026

Tear-gassed high-schoolers

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/0...eral-operation

**Winehole23** · 01-08-2026

video contradicts official lies

https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100...ing-video.html

**Winehole23** · 01-08-2026

**ChumpDumper** · 01-08-2026

https://x.com/RoguePOTUSStaff/status...98595732214164

I'm a little surprised the secret policeman didn't put his snuff film on X yet.

yoni will say they have to translate the do ents.

**Yonivore** · 01-08-2026

Originally Posted by Winehole23

video contradicts official lies

https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100...ing-video.html

This video demonstrates self-defense. Sorry about the music. If I find the slow-motion zoomed-in version, I saw earlier, I'll replace it.

**ChumpDumper** · 01-08-2026

Originally Posted by Yonivore

This video demonstrates self-defense. Sorry about the music. If I find the slow-motion zoomed-in version, I saw earlier, I'll replace it.

Nope. The angle where you can actually see the secret police shows he does not get hit at all and starts chasing alongside the car so he can finish murdering her through the side window.

He jerks back because he's unholstering his gun while trying to keep his Facebook live stream going.

Your video looks like AI processed slop.

**Yonivore** · 01-08-2026

Now comes a video showing Ms. Good's "wife" claiming responsibility for talking her into going down to Central Minneapolis to interfere with ICE Operations.

Video appears to show hysterical, blood-covered wife of Renee Nicole Good, woman killed by ICE, crying out ‘it’s my fault’

**ChumpDumper** · 01-08-2026

It's the fault of your secret police. Just let her go home.

Easy peasy.

**Yonivore** · 01-08-2026

Noted forensics and investigative expert Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez renders her verdict in the tragic shooting of Renee Good in Minneapolis.

Democrats Reach Verdict in Minneapolis ICE Shooting

Originally Posted by Noted expert, AOC

“At the end of the day, what we saw today was a murder, and murders in cold blood need to be prosecuted.”