Reply With Quote
Dead criminal.
Meanwhile, Charlie Kirk, also a dead person, has been smeared non-stop since a Leftist lunatic shot him last year.
“He called the Gestapo to send his Jewish neighbors to the concentration camps so he could take their home for himself” is the 1930s version of this.
Dead criminal.
Meanwhile, Charlie Kirk, also a dead person, has been smeared non-stop since a Leftist lunatic shot him last year.
Leftist TDS America. The rest of us are just fine.Trump's America
There are already laws against excessive force.
You can be disappeared by the secret police at any time.
You.
You say that as if a VA hospital ICU nurse can't be a criminal.
'Angel Of Death' Trial Opens
You say that as if Pretti was a murderer.
Teargassing kids and parade marchers from the rooftops?
DHS are the biggest pussies in the world
They're scared, man.
SCARED!
Hey, they're cheering for illegals that are eating the dogs! They're also eating the CATS!
Liberal are such ing idiots - dangerous ones, too.
Don't bring kids to a protest.
At least there's one intelligent parent out there...
ICE agents killed adult US citizens. Your Podcast masters are completely done talking about that, huh.
Why are you okay with tear gassing kids though?
Indiscriminate use of chemical irritiants is concerning -- tear gas is an abortifacient, and pepper spray seems to be being used to express mere annoyance
Mike Johnson is wrong on two counts
ICE warrants are usually signed by ICE officers, not judges
In the USA, judicial warrants are still needed to enter your home without your consent
Q: You're a cons utional lawyer. Can you detail the 4th Amendment protections someone has if ICE approaches their home w/an administrative warrant?
MIKE JOHNSON: When ICE goes to execute a warrant, it's issued by an immigration judge, & that is a sufficient legal authority to go apprehend someone
The Minnesota AUSA office has gone from ~50 lawyers to reportedly 9 in about one month
Still looking for a cite on this twitter post, it appears to be one of Paul Blume's www.fox9.com/person/b/pau...
h
DOJ ordering jump squads of AUSAs to accelerate prosecution of the public where DHS is operating would seem to be designed to burn out AUSAs
There's definitely some tension there
How do you ramp up federal prosecution when you're downsizing the prosecutors?
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law...l-us-attorneysThe Justice Department is requiring all US attorneys to rapidly assign prosecutors for “emergency jump teams” supporting districts handling alleged assaults or obstruction of law enforcement, according to an internal memo obtained by Bloomberg Law.
A senior official instructed leaders of the nation’s 93 US attorney’s offices Feb. 2 that they have until Feb. 6 to designate one or two assistant US attorneys who’d be available for short-term surges in unspecified areas needing “urgent assistance due to emergent or critical situations.” The memo coincides with reports of mass resignations of federal prosecutors in Minneapolis.
Rather than deploying volunteers to meet the needs of Minnesota or other districts experiencing protests from White House-directed boosts in law enforcement, the “jump teams” are designed to establish a standing list of prosecutors available on a rotating basis, said Francey Hakes, the director of DOJ’s Executive Office for US Attorneys, in her emailed memo.
jfc this sounds crazy
88 cases for one AUSA in a month?
enough with the casual use of tear gas on other Americans for no reason
https://www.do entcloud.org/do e...nsontro020326/Judge issues TRO reining in tactics against peaceful protesters and journalists at Portland OR ICE facility. Judge Michael Simon bars use of crowd control munitions against people who don't pose physical threat.
Backstory:
A week or so back, ICE detained a berland, ME sheriff's deputy and left his cruiser running in the street with the door ajar
The sheriff was pissed at piss-poor policing and not even getting a courtesy call
Next he hears, DHS is subpoena-ing all his employment records
https://www.bangordailynews.com/2026...yment-records/Federal authorities demanded information about those employed at the berland County jail a day after Sheriff Kevin Joyce blasted immigration agents for arresting one of his guards.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement served the county with a subpoena for the employment data on Jan. 23, Joyce told the Bangor Daily News in response to questions on Tuesday. The request sought information about everyone who has worked at the jail since January 2025, the sheriff said. The county complied.
The reason for the subpoena, which has not previously been reported, is not entirely clear. It adds new detail to how ICE responded to the sheriff’s criticism of its tactics during the agency’s surge in Maine last month. Joyce excoriated ICE during a press conference on the third day of the raid, a day after agents arrested an Angolan immigrant who worked as a corrections officer.
Hours later, the agency began removing detainees it had been housing at the jail under a longstanding contract between the federal government and the county. An ICE spokesperson said it could no longer partner with a jail that employed an “illegal alien.”
But the guard, Emanuel Ludovic Mbuangi Landila, passed multiple background checks after applying for the job in late 2024 and had a work permit, Joyce told reporters last month. The sheriff described him as “squeaky clean.”
Landila is one of several immigrants the county jail has hired over the past two years to help fill chronic vacancies and the second to be detained by immigration authorities during President Donald Trump’s second term. A York County corrections officer was also detained by ICE amid its surge in Maine. In a June interview, Joyce said the jail employed about 25 immigrants, all of whom passed background checks and required work permits to get hired.
wrote a polite but critical letter to a prosecutor in an asylum case and got served an administrative warrant that DHS spokeperson Tricia McLaughlin later described as a criminal investigation
this is Soviet-style social control
https://newrepublic.com/post/206088/...iticized-emailThe Washington Post reports that a retired Philadelphia man, Jon, 67, found himself in the government’s crosshairs after he emailed a lead prosecutor at the Department of Homeland Security, Joseph Dernbach, who was handling the deportation case of an Afghan refugee, identified as H, asking him to consider that the man’s life was in danger from the Taliban.
“Mr. Dernbach, don’t play Russian roulette with H’s life,” Jon wrote from his gmail account. “Err on the side of caution. There’s a reason the US government along with many other governments don’t recognise the Taliban. Apply principles of common sense and decency.”
Later that day, Jon received an email from Google notifying him that an administrative subpoena had been sent to them from the Department of Homeland Security “compelling the release of information related to your Google Account.” Federal agencies can issue such subpoenas without an order from a judge or grand jury, and Google gave Jon, who withheld his last name to protect his family from the government, one week to challenge it.
Laws are supposed to restrict the use of administrative subpoenas, but DHS has used the tool against dissent protected under the First Amendment to the Cons ution. Jon could not find who in the agency issued the subpoena, let alone a record of it to show an attorney.
Days later, DHS agents showed up at Jon’s door. A naturalized U.S. citizen originally from the U.K., Jon was worried about potential violence. The agents showed him a copy of the email and asked to see his side of the story. They didn’t know about the administrative subpoena but said they received orders to interview Jon by DHS headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Eventually, the agents agreed that Jon had committed no crimes after he told them he found Dernbach’s email address through a simple Google search. Jon secured pro bono representation by ACLU attorneys, who argue that the government is violating a statute that limits how administrative subpoenas can be used for “immigration enforcement” and that the government targeted Jon for protected speech.
“It doesn’t take that much to make people look over their shoulder, to think twice before they speak again,” said Nathan Freed Wessler, one of Jon’s attorneys. “That’s why these kinds of subpoenas and other actions—the visits—are so pernicious. You don’t have to lock somebody up to make them reticent to make their voice heard. It really doesn’t take much, because the power of the federal government is so overwhelming.”
wrote a polite but critical letter to a prosecutor in an asylum case and got served an administrative warrant that DHS spokeperson Tricia McLaughlin later described as a criminal investigation
this is Soviet-style social control
https://newrepublic.com/post/206088/...iticized-emailThe Washington Post reports that a retired Philadelphia man, Jon, 67, found himself in the government’s crosshairs after he emailed a lead prosecutor at the Department of Homeland Security, Joseph Dernbach, who was handling the deportation case of an Afghan refugee, identified as H, asking him to consider that the man’s life was in danger from the Taliban.
“Mr. Dernbach, don’t play Russian roulette with H’s life,” Jon wrote from his gmail account. “Err on the side of caution. There’s a reason the US government along with many other governments don’t recognise the Taliban. Apply principles of common sense and decency.”
Later that day, Jon received an email from Google notifying him that an administrative subpoena had been sent to them from the Department of Homeland Security “compelling the release of information related to your Google Account.” Federal agencies can issue such subpoenas without an order from a judge or grand jury, and Google gave Jon, who withheld his last name to protect his family from the government, one week to challenge it.
Laws are supposed to restrict the use of administrative subpoenas, but DHS has used the tool against dissent protected under the First Amendment to the Cons ution. Jon could not find who in the agency issued the subpoena, let alone a record of it to show an attorney.
Days later, DHS agents showed up at Jon’s door. A naturalized U.S. citizen originally from the U.K., Jon was worried about potential violence. The agents showed him a copy of the email and asked to see his side of the story. They didn’t know about the administrative subpoena but said they received orders to interview Jon by DHS headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Eventually, the agents agreed that Jon had committed no crimes after he told them he found Dernbach’s email address through a simple Google search. Jon secured pro bono representation by ACLU attorneys, who argue that the government is violating a statute that limits how administrative subpoenas can be used for “immigration enforcement” and that the government targeted Jon for protected speech.
“It doesn’t take that much to make people look over their shoulder, to think twice before they speak again,” said Nathan Freed Wessler, one of Jon’s attorneys. “That’s why these kinds of subpoenas and other actions—the visits—are so pernicious. You don’t have to lock somebody up to make them reticent to make their voice heard. It really doesn’t take much, because the power of the federal government is so overwhelming.”
https://www.startribune.com/ice-raids-minnesota/601546426Remember the incident where DHS claimed officers shot a guy because he attacked them with a snow shovel?
Yeah. It didn't happen. They shot him through the door of his own home. And then arrested him. And then lied about it. Again.
And they almost shot some kids in the process.
teach my grandkids this is what the good guys look like?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
