It is appreciated.
Boycott that overly-moderated, quivering pink vagina infested goty hole (BaselineBums.com).
Originally Posted by baseline bum
Called Silver a name that rhymes with Mike
You bet I did. It was justified, unlike the most BULL ejection in the history of the NBA Playoffs, the Iran war, and Israel's pathetic existence in general.
https://baselinebums.com/threads/playoffs-round-2-game-4-spurs-timberwolves-2-1-sun-05-10-2026-6-30-cdt.599/page-36
The common denominator to record-high gas prices, record inflation, goty moderation, David STERN and Adam SILVER, Wemby getting ejected for that Malone didn't even get a technical foul for in the 90s (and he wasn't even the aggressor), Epstein and pedophilia, crypto the Libertarian anti establishment asset down 80%, the Spurs never winning a back to back le in the Duncan era but Kobe getting gift wrapped multiples, the bull Iran war, Charlie Kirk getting assassinated, AI taking over all our jobs, gotry infesting the entire West and blaming Islam for it all as the cherry on top?
I-S-R-A-E-L.
It is appreciated.
You agreed to the Terms of Service, correct?
Lol getting booted from the other place. It's just a game dude.
Anyone have insight on how to find the house/geo-location of "Guru of Nothing" and/or scott?
Handsome financial compensation will be rewarded.
Last edited by Millennial_Messiah; 3 Weeks Ago at 09:24 PM.
fine print and capitalism. Especially woke jewish capitalism. The consumer must be protected against the rich at all costs.
Just a game?
John Lithgow in his prime would put a bullet in the eye of someone who tells him that to his face, tbh.![]()
So you did agree to the Terms of Service?
Maybe it's time the government protects free speech against rich capitalism and establishments, tbh.
Enforce the 1st amendment on an INDIVIDUAL level and not on a corporate/elitist level. Just like with the mask and vax mandates and freedom of speech. Same goes for the left, if they want to say " america" or " Trump" or whatever in a crowd, make sure that speech is protected too as long as it doesn't directly infringe on others.
But you agreed to the Terms of Service, correct?
I don't agree with the government allowing ToS's and similar things like that to exist. I believe in governments protecting individual consumers against corporations and establishments.
I believe in radical populism and that Woke Capitalism is far worse than any Stage 4 Glioblastoma, tbh.
But you did actually agree to the Terms of Service, right?
Companies being allowed to force someone to click a checkbox with fine print that allows corporations to suppress individual freedom of speech, should be banned and gassed and deleted just like the oppressors and their families who were rightfully gassed and deleted from existence in the early 1940s tbh
The question remains: Did you agree to the Terms of Service?
There's no need to filibuster. Just answer.
that's like the same dumb two-bit binary ed logic as "...did Wemby elbow Naz Reid, yes or no"?
yes or no, rarely if ever, tells the whole picture of ANYTHING. binary logic is for re s with an IQ of exactly 2.
on a similar note.... the two party system. trump and kamala both ing suck.
Even with all the editorializing, you should be able to muster the courage to say whether you accepted the Terms of Service or not.
Everything you have said to this point is part of the record except whether you agreed to the Terms of Service.
Did you?
your honor, objection relevance
side note: truth tables are for loser incel engineering major nerds tbh. i looked at one once in like 2014 and was like, nah this .
Overruled.
You agreed to them.
It's really the only relevant fact here.
this thread is a pretty good example of how antisemitism progressively takes over a person's mind until their expressions become nothing but gibberish about Jews -- it was precipitated by a foul call in a basketball game and a lost bet
No, it was precipitated long before that, this is just another trigger point
the Termite class hoarded ~95% of the wealth in depression-era Germany despite being ~10% at most of the country's population. Do you liberals who claim to be economically left wing not have a problem with that?
thanks for underscoring my point
Let's discuss this.
What is your source?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)