And my conclusion is that those number are bull relative to judging Manu’s importance on this team, that your logic is flawed. Is that to difficult for you to comprehend?
Huh?
So you don't think at all? Why have a brain if all you are going to do is go along with everything you only know is 100% true?
Learn. Invent. Live.
![]()
And my conclusion is that those number are bull relative to judging Manu’s importance on this team, that your logic is flawed. Is that to difficult for you to comprehend?
I am talking about you, I made the assumption that you believed the Spurs are better without Manu, you disagreed, I simply stated that you wouldn't have asked the question of this thread if you didn't believe it in some way shape or form.
You mean the numbers are flawed because of the small amount of samples? If that is your conclusion, congrats on figuring out what everyone else in this thread concluded as well.
I'm sorry that even pointing at numbers that question the Spurs is such a hard thing for you to handle. Maybe next time have someone hold your hand when you open one of my threads.
Thanks.
Buddy Holly, theres a pothole on Blanco road, go write a pe ion for it.
IMO, If Devin Brown were further along in his progress, and you could rely on Brent Barry to come through offensively in 4th quarters, I would trade Ginobili.
Ginobili would get you a DAMN good post presence.
It's not my fault I saw stupid and call it on itself (you question).
Apology accepted. Next time don't assume until you read the entire thread, not just the le.
Which brings us back to Manu for Martin.
Yea or Nay?
Think about it...
FC - Duncan
F - Martin
F - Bowen
G - Barry/Brown
G - Parker
With Barry or Brown off the bench with Rasho.
Enticing...
(Or could we even do better than Martin?)
Ducks has compe ion.
Oh man, that one hurt. It did.
By the way, where you by chance jumping up and down on Blanco Road?
But we're not at the point where Devin is a 12 and 6 guy or Brent is 5 years younger.
I'd trade Barry and maybe even Devin before Manu.
You're an idiot TPug.
The one thing the Spurs do better when Manu does not play is take care of the ball. In the Portland game they had 8 turnovers as a team and against the Wizards they had 10. I wonder why????
What? And take away Rasho's minutes? WTF?![]()
don't forget manu's D. sure bruce is our money man, but manu logs good minutes on the defensive side as well....
and one shot for 3 in the playoffs to win the game....you want barry, beno, devin, bowen, parker or manu taking that shot? rank'em. and remember who's hit big 3's in the playoffs for us before when you do.
I would explain my stance on Nesterovic for the billionth time, But ill refrain for the children in the audience.
If you could trade Ginobili, and get a PJ Brown, a Kenyon Martin, a Nazy Mohammed, IMO, you do it.
Big men are much harder to come by, than great forwards.
I agreed with TIMVP this summer when he said take Manu's money and give it to Boozer.
Boozer, Duncan, Bowen, Brown Parker is a dynasty waiting to happen.
Plus, Rasho would improve coming off the bench, playing against lesser compe ion, AND, not having to be next to Duncan.
This remind me that a while ago, some fans wanted to start Beno and trade parker.
Now it is time for Manu to be criticize. Duncan must watch out before someone step up and say somethin like we should trade Duncan for O'Neil or Garnett
Manubarry, beno, devin, bowen, parker or manu
Devin
Barry
Beno
Bowen
Parker
No question Manu is on the top of that list, but, you trading Manu getting back an all star Forward, you prob wouldnt have to worry about it.
If you offered me garnett for Duncan??O'Neil or Garnett
Id have to think about it.
Id prob take it.
Would you pay KG with this paper:
?
Leave it to you to misinterpret a good-natured tease.
Sniff, I didnt see a smile.
an overlooked factor in this discussion is that if you drop manu then you lose quality argentine bandwagon fans like ALVAREZ
Damn. This thread, goofy as it started, is approaching Classic status.
I'm just surprised that a man who was invited at the roundtable to discuss about the NBA and the spurs,someone considered having enlightened opinions can start such a BS thread.
BS because u can't ask if the spurs could be better without MANU?were u really serious when u asked that?or u were just bored??
________
HotLilu
Last edited by san antonio spurs; 09-17-2011 at 10:13 AM.
spurs fans always let blind love get in the way when it comes to basketball.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)