Yes, because the Spurs winning by two at home after needing two miraculous three pointers (one by Tim Duncan) to avoid losing is proof that the Spurs would have won if the Suns didn't get suspended.
...regarding game one of the Suns/Spurs? I am very curious to hear, especially what Greeny had to say - considering that he was one of the talking heads that claimed that the Suns would have won last year without the one game suspension to Amare and Boris. Thanks in advance.
Yes, because the Spurs winning by two at home after needing two miraculous three pointers (one by Tim Duncan) to avoid losing is proof that the Spurs would have won if the Suns didn't get suspended.
Please show me where I said anything of the sort. I wasn't even insinuating that. I only wanted to see what their thoughts were, and if Greeny was going to give any credit to the Spurs - because even you must admit, that they deserve a ton.
Anyways, the only proof that I needed to see that the Suns would not have won if not for the suspensions were the other 5 games that the Suns were at full strength - and the Spurs were shorthanded for one of them. Heck, you were even up BIG in the game that you lost at home during the suspensions.
1. And yet you STILL lost
2. LOL the Suns STILL would have lost last year anyway
Butthurt Suns fan is butthurt.
C'mon Spur fans. Duncan hits a 3! Finley who most of u hate hits a 3 at the end. Shaq plays like 5 minutes in first half because of fouls. Amare fouls out in ot. This all happened at home. I would not be surprised at all if Suns win the next 4
and snack will be in foul trouble for the rest of the series. haven't you heard 'he aint' going to change the way he plays'?
Snack is slow and can't move laterally..he wants the refs to treat him differently.. what a puss..... seems to me someone with one ounce of brain matter would realize that they would have to adapt to way a game is being called but not snack...
good luck.
Mike and Mike are the worst when it comes to the NBA. They don't like it and make no bones about it; it gets relegated to third-class citizenship on their show, and when they do have something to say, it's out of complete ignorance.
Think about it . . . they bring Vitale on to comment on the NBA.
no, the spurs winning 3 out of the 5 games where the suns were at full strength (including 1 where the spurs were not) was proof of that.
1) Shaq is one big animal in there bumping into everyone including his teamates and the refs
2) Amare does not have the IQ level necessary to control body movements during heat of the moment
3) D'antoni is gotta be the most clueless coach when it comes to the playoffs, Pop own his ass so bad, it's embarrasing. I mean Pop actually called 2 hack a shaq plays and D'antoni immediately takes shaq out. That was Pop's plan from the beginning.![]()
but sure, keep beleiving suns can win next 4![]()
I completely agree with this. They're uninterested in and uninformed about the NBA in general. I like Golic fine, but Greeny's fussy, whiny persona turns me off so I rarely tune into their show.
That being said, I did have it on for a little while this morning and they were interviewing Hubie Brown. When they asked him about the Spurs/Suns game 1, I don't remember what all he said but I do remember him saying the Spurs were a joy to watch. Neither Mike commented on anything Hubie said, instead moving on to the next series. Hard to say whether it was a lack of interest or a lack of time, but likely both. That's the only discussion I recall hearing this morning on their show about Spurs/Suns.
Mike and Mike aren't going to say anything positive about the Spurs even if they win the next 25 les.
Hubie spoke at length about the Spurs heart.
I appreciated the "they're just a joy to watch" comment, too.
Like Shoog, though, I never, ever turn to Mike & Mike for any sort of real insight into anything -- it's on and it's about sports so I'll watch/listen, but usually because nothing else interests me.
Mike Greenburgh has the sports intelligence of a flea on a dog's ass.
Golic is the epitome of the "Dumb jock" stereotype. Czaban will talk about them and appreciate it and is pretty fair. Morning shows aren't really where to go for the NBA opinion. Wait later for shows like Mike Tirico who usually has Scott Van Pelt or Mic e Tafoya on to get a fair and well balanced intelligent NBA comment.
Of course ESPN 1250 the Zone should be your place to listen today seeing as its day 1 for The Thompson Brothers from 3-5 then Chris and Jason 5-8![]()
hubie is a bandwagoner. no matter who wins, he loves that team and disses the other team.
I also think the back-door sweep is coming.
I beg to differ, they bring in Hubie Brown all the time and there is really no better analyst to interview about the NBA than Hubie.
How was Finley's 3-pter miraculous?
Was Nash's game-tying falling down 3-pter not miraculous?
Hubie is good, but I stopped listening to M&M months ago (well, actually the station stopped carrying them). When I did listen, they were still bringing Vitale on. And the rest of the show doesn't make up for their general NBA incompetence, so good riddance I say.
You know, if Kori and LJ were anything like the pussy moderators at your piece of fan site, you'd already be gone.
Go back to your pussy, cry baby fansite.
those two knuckleheads had y v on this morning and and he babbled on about the common denominator between tim duncan and chris paul.........wake forest baby!!!
compelling stuff, man.
Can 1250 be streamed from somewhere? I can't seem to find their official website.
Why in the F would you want to know what Mic e and Mic e think about us? They have been Spur haters for A LONG TIME and won't stop now.
Still waiting for a Suns fan to acknowledge that Nash hit a miraculous 3 point shot to tie it all the while maintiang the Spurs got lucky.... ( pin hitting ground........wind bristling through leaves..)
I want to make clear that I think Nash is a an all time great player...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)