Reply With Quote
I've alwys thought that Nash'd be a great backup for the Spurs. When can he leave Phoenix?
What do you guys think? After Brent retires, maybe Nash could step in a fill his 3pt shooter role. Then, the Spurs should be able to take Nash for a ride to the finals.
I've alwys thought that Nash'd be a great backup for the Spurs. When can he leave Phoenix?
If he can be had for vet min -in his twilight yrs, why not ?
he probably let the man he's guarding easily scored 20pts
another like 3 years?
He doesn't have what Barry brings to the table.
And how is that money going to work?
i am sure tim wont mind giving steve what amare and shaq could not have given him.
Nash is the purest point guard in the league. I've always loved his game and respected the man.
But, the guy is also one of the biggest defensive liabilities there ever was. I can't even imagine what his defense will look like in a couple more yrs.
its not like he gonna be a starter then..we woudl be used when tony on the bench.
Manu always confessed that he would love to play with Nash too..
Let's see how great of a defensive coach Pop is.
I'd say bring on board.
Nash doesn't work in this system, because Pop wants his PGs to be aggressive, look to score, and play defense. , he wants Jacque Vaughn to be a score-first PG.
Nash is a great scorer, so he's capable of fitting in that regard....but it would be a considerable waste of his passing talent to try to fit him in the current system. And as you've seen with recent failed acquisitions (Shaq and J-Kidd), it is important that game-changing talents adjust to the system rather than the system adjusting to the talent.
It just wouldn't work.
Hopefully we'll have Mahinmi & Splitter to cover his a$$ in the lane by then, still led by Duncan ofcourse. This is so friggen funny, you guys reject the notion of having a 2 time MVP playing for your team, even just going off the bench as a veterant role player ? LOL
Manu vs Tony thread?Manu always confessed that he would love to play with Nash too..
When he ends his contract with the Suns we'll sign him for the vet-min.
He would have the perfect age for us.
Spurs is a team on defense. Why would they want Nash, a person who can't even spell defense?
Nash is a better defender than Barry and Finley put together.
What's with all the delusional threads today?
How can standing there and watching your opponent drive to the basket be better defense than what Barry and Finley do?
Being a great scorer Nash is would surely make him a great 2nd string PG. His passing skills is just gravy.
Pop would not put up with his matadore-d, and would bench his ass.
Nash can draw an offensive foul every once in a while.
where should I have to sign? I like Nash, whenever we got go small or run Steve would be great, not sure if it is reachable in term of money, but it is ok with me.
I'm sure he will be reachable in terms of rings.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
