Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30
  1. #1
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    2,585
    On defense?


    God bless him for his 3's and J's but I'm just saying....

  2. #2
    Sex Panther user- 60% of the time, it works every time. Sausage's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    788
    He's not the best defensive player. Everytime Diaw had him in the low block he would score, so it was just a matchup problem. You can't put Bruce on him because he was on Nash, and Parker was on Bell.

    But he's definitely lost a step, and will probably see the same results this series.

  3. #3
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    No more than he has been in the past.

  4. #4
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    4,026
    His defense is utter trash but we can't expect all of our players to be super well-rounded.

    However, Finley-Diaw was simply a mismatch from the start.

    Ginobili's defense is fairly solid overall, and although Diaw didn't push Ginobili around as much as he pushed Finley around, Diaw still scored on Ginobili a reasonable amount of times as well, and Ginobili is certainly not a poor defender (overall when it's not a blatant mismatch) by any stretch of the imagination.

  5. #5
    Get Sarver out!!!! pauls931's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    5,236
    I wondered about that. Why did they have him on Diaw? Seems like finley should be guarding a shooting guard. He still lights it up from the 3, but is a far cry from what I remember when he was in Phoenix.

  6. #6
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    2,585
    He's not the best defensive player. Everytime Diaw had him in the low block he would score, so it was just a matchup problem. You can't put Bruce on him because he was on Nash, and Parker was on Bell.

    But he's definitely lost a step, and will probably see the same results this series.
    That was torture watching Diaw get free baskets. Game 5, I was yelling to bring Ime in and he seemed to do a little bit better, but the refs would just not let any Spur even touch Diaw. Did Pop even try to make an adjustment for this problem from game 4 going into game 5? They couldn't really double team/give Finley too much help b/c of Shaq and Amare.

  7. #7
    Sex Panther user- 60% of the time, it works every time. Sausage's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    788
    I wondered about that. Why did they have him on Diaw? Seems like finley should be guarding a shooting guard. He still lights it up from the 3, but is a far cry from what I remember when he was in Phoenix.

    If they took Finley and put him on Bell, then Diaw would just abuse Tony Parker just as bad down low.

  8. #8
    He's heating up DespЏrado's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    1,176
    He has his moments but for the team no body has beat him out yet.

    Udoka is the future and Barry is still not fully reintegrated into the offense but as the playoffs progress I expect the Spurs to use Udoka and Barry to a greater degree, unless Finley can find a way to be consistent.

  9. #9
    Get Sarver out!!!! pauls931's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    5,236
    If they took Finley and put him on Bell, then Diaw would just abuse Tony Parker just as bad down low.
    I guess the assignments are funny with Bowen on Nash. So if it was parker on nash, then it would have been Bowen on Diaw?

  10. #10
    Believe. oboymeetsogirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    141
    A liability? Did you notice Pop panicking every time Diaw posted up and threw in those baby hooks against Fin? Absolutely not... the idea was to *let* the Suns funnel their offense into Diaw. It was this -- plus the Hack-a-Shaq -- that got the ball out of Nash's hands, making the Nash/Stoudemire two-man game disappear for entire quarters at a time. The Suns themselves admit (with the wisdom of hindsight) that the strategy worked like a charm.

    I know you've been watching the Spurs for years, man, but you should be used to Pop's subtle manipulation of opponents' team dynamics. Personally, I thought it was a thing of beauty in that last round. Now let's see what he cooks up for the talent laden Hornets...

  11. #11
    Thank you, Tim Duncan! peskypesky's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    8,747
    the refs didn't allow anyone to defend Diaw. he would just catch a pass, back into his defender, and a foul was called on Finley or Udoka or whoever. i've never seen anything like it.

    let's give finley a chance in this next series before we send him out to pasture.

  12. #12
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    72
    A liability? Did you notice Pop panicking every time Diaw posted up and threw in those baby hooks against Fin? Absolutely not... the idea was to *let* the Suns funnel their offense into Diaw. It was this -- plus the Hack-a-Shaq -- that got the ball out of Nash's hands, making the Nash/Stoudemire two-man game disappear for entire quarters at a time. The Suns themselves admit (with the wisdom of hindsight) that the strategy worked like a charm.

    I know you've been watching the Spurs for years, man, but you should be used to Pop's subtle manipulation of opponents' team dynamics. Personally, I thought it was a thing of beauty in that last round. Now let's see what he cooks up for the talent laden Hornets...
    Well said. Posting Diaw down low, also took away tons of 3-point oppurtunities. If your Nash, and you see the mismatch, your gonna give it to him, and you get Nash, Bell just watching from afar with no chance of shooting a 3-pointer, because Diaw is gonna take the shot everytime instead of kicking it back out.

    Phil, he ain't got on Pop.

  13. #13
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Finley's always been a liability on defense. He has long stretches of competence now and flashes of brilliance. As long as he's drawing off defenders, shooting when open, and not playing the 4 position, he's fine.

  14. #14
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    Finley's always been a liability on defense. He has long stretches of competence now and flashes of brilliance. As long as he's drawing off defenders, shooting when open, and not playing the 4 position, he's fine.
    Agreed.

    He's only a liability when he stops hitting shots to the point other teams ignore him. As long as he's shooting well enough to be respected, he's not a liability.

    Finley was poor against Diaw but that isn't too surprising. However, if he matches up with players like Bonzi Wells and Lamar Odom in upcoming rounds, he'll need to be stronger against post players.

  15. #15
    Believe. wijayas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    931
    On defense?


    God bless him for his 3's and J's but I'm just saying....
    Win some, lose some. Remember 8 three-pointers he hung on the Nuggets last year?

  16. #16
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    Finley's always been a liability on defense. He has long stretches of competence now and flashes of brilliance. As long as he's drawing off defenders, shooting when open, and not playing the 4 position, he's fine.
    Exactly. He hasn't lost a step defensively. He never had it to begin with.

    If he's not hitting his jumper, his time on the floor is useless.

  17. #17
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Win some, lose some. Remember 8 three-pointers he hung on the Nuggets last year?
    How about just remember games 1 and 2?

    Once again, Finley's clutch shooting helps the Spurs get out of the first round.

  18. #18
    Believe.
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    3
    He is a liability. Ever since he stole Mark Cuban's money, he has lost all desire to work or play basketball. It's once in every blue moon that he would hit a three pointer. No one on the Mavericks squad misses him.

  19. #19
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,442
    The Mavs are missing the rest of the playoffs.

  20. #20
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    He is a liability. Ever since he stole Mark Cuban's money, he has lost all desire to work or play basketball. It's once in every blue moon that he would hit a three pointer. No one on the Mavericks squad misses him.
    Since he's the first one out shooting before just about every Spurs game, I'd say that you are incorrect.

    I'm sure there are many Mavs fans sitting at home today thinking "well at least we have the luxury tax savings".

  21. #21
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Exactly. He hasn't lost a step defensively. He never had it to begin with.

    If he's not hitting his jumper, his time on the floor is useless.
    Welllll, he was a really good defender before he played for Don Nelson, but I agree with you to an extent. He hasn't really lost a step, he just doesn't step as often as he used to. He has really played some good defense at times against guys you wouldn't expect him to match up well with.

    Howevuh, I agree that if he's not hitting his shots, you might as well have Bowen in the game and have a shot at saving your +/-.

  22. #22
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    Finley used to be a quick explosive player, now he's a great clutch shooter but a liability on defense. He still makes those dagger 3s in crunch time so he's good to have around.

    I wonder who he will be guarding in the Hornet series...Mo Pete or Peja? I'd think Bowen would spend time on CP3, if not he could cover Peja, Finley on Mo Pete and Tony on CP3.

    Finley on Mo Pete should be just fine.

    Tony on CP3 and vice versa should be very intriguing.

  23. #23
    Believe. SpurAddict561's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    1,359
    ya, I just hope when they bring in Bonzi that Pop takes Finley out or at least off him

    cuz he's gonna use him just like Diaw....but I still love Fin, he's hit alot of big shots for us.

  24. #24
    Believe. GinobiliLooms's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    218
    Michael Finley is a in stud and has been super clutch for the Spurs. He's never been known as a great defender but at least he works at it and puts in the effort.

  25. #25
    BOOM!!!, Baby! Reggie Miller's Avatar
    My Team
    Indiana Pacers
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    1,388
    A liability? Did you notice Pop panicking every time Diaw posted up and threw in those baby hooks against Fin? Absolutely not... the idea was to *let* the Suns funnel their offense into Diaw. It was this -- plus the Hack-a-Shaq -- that got the ball out of Nash's hands, making the Nash/Stoudemire two-man game disappear for entire quarters at a time. The Suns themselves admit (with the wisdom of hindsight) that the strategy worked like a charm.

    I know you've been watching the Spurs for years, man, but you should be used to Pop's subtle manipulation of opponents' team dynamics. Personally, I thought it was a thing of beauty in that last round. Now let's see what he cooks up for the talent laden Hornets...

    That's how I saw it. Pop doesn't try to win the game by winning every matchup, just the critical ones.

    IMHO, the Suns lost because: 1) Nash was ineffective, largely due to the strategy above ^; and 2) While they have improved on defense, there was nowhere to go but up, so too little too late.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •