Reply With Quote
i'm just saying what i believe in. never knew that was against the law. if yall put pressure on cp3 then the other guys will hurt you, and the spurs will not when. its common sense really.
"basketball talk" = blowing sunshine up the Hornets' ass because they won two games at home.
i'm just saying what i believe in. never knew that was against the law. if yall put pressure on cp3 then the other guys will hurt you, and the spurs will not when. its common sense really.
It's not against the law, but don't about a lack of basketball talk when you come into a matchup thread and "the spurs will not when" is the best you can bring.
I say let Chris Paul put up Amare's points and Nash's assists. The Spurs have won that way before.
Right. So you really didn't want to talk basketball -- you wanted Spurs fans to talk basketball and then wanted to just say "There's no way the Spurs can beat the Hornets. The Hornets are just too good."
As someone around here once said:
good talk.
Oh but the Hornets are invincible. It's not like the Spurs had a flawed defensive plan or missed WIDE OPEN SHOTS. Or lead at the half of both games. Or anything like that. Nope. The Spurs can't hang with the Hornets. Neither can any other team.
Yeah, I agree. That's a matchup problem I'd like to see the Hornets put themselves in.
I think the Spurs need to contain Peja. West and Paul will score, but so do Amare and Nash. I was surprised how well Thomas defended West in game 2.
I think the Spurs bigger problems are on the offensive end. They are not hitting open jump shots, which they see a lot because of double teaming Duncan. To me this means more Barry, less Udoka, and pray Finley gets hot.
It's all about points per possession, and three point shots negate good defense. Limit the three point shooters and even if the Spurs play badly, as they have in the first two games, the Hornets are within striking distance in the fourth quarter.
how hard is it for yall to understand? im not saying yall can't beat the hornets. i'm saying if yall put alot of effort into shuttin down paul then the rest of our team will beat yall. it's the same as any other team, if you put alot of effort to guard there star player then if he has a good supporting cast then they will beat you.
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
WE KNOW, that's what's been happening. We are saying the Spurs need to focus on everyone else and make him be the scorer.
You really need to read the le of this thread and think about what it means.
This entire thread is about how the Spurs need to quit focusing on Paul
Bump
P. Stojakovic
MINUTES: 35:31
FG-FGA: 2-7
3FG - 3FGA: 1-3
PTS: 8
Thank you, Pop!
did he not get 3 of those points from the stripe
bowen definitely gives pedja some fits
Rinse & Repeat
Spurstalk, we know stuff
(and two of those were on FTs on that BS foul call in the fourth away from the ball when Peja flopped)
They didn't guard him for
Pop reads ST.
Do you mean when he threw three elbows at Bowen's head and Bowen got whistled for it or are you talking about another play I don't remember?Spurstalk, we know stuff
(and two of those were on FTs on that BS foul call in the fourth away from the ball when Peja flopped)
that call tilted me so hard.
I went back and watched that three or four times, and I couldn't see anything Bowen did. Peja got frustrated (understandably at being shut down) and the refs rewarded him based I suppose on Bowen's reputation. Really shoddy reffing. When the game gets chippy it seems like the refs will crack down on the Spurs to calm the other team down, because they know the Spurs aren't going to lose their cool. Maddening.
That was the one. Ted Kennedy should be fired for that sequence.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
