Simple

[MannyIsGod]

It really is simple. Every one talks about adjustments and experience. The pundits break down the match ups for you and tell you why Player X is going to dominate and about how they change the game for others. Yeah but thats all good and great but basketball - even at the NBA level - can be a very simple game.

Make shots and you win. Miss them and you lose.


Game 1: 40.8/38.7
Game 2: 42.5/29.6
Game 3: 48.2/44.0
Game 4: 51.8/30.8
Game 5: 37.7/39.1

Those are the Spurs FG%/3PFG% from each game. As you can see, the difference in wins and losses is as simple as making shots. There are nuances to this, but for the most part the Spurs are able to get open shots in every single game.

However, in their wins they're hitting many more of those shots. In their wins they also get to the basket much better. A big part of that is also decision making and finding the appropriate shooter when the Hornets double.


What also needs to be considered when talking about how many times the Spurs pick and roll and how many times they find Duncan on teh block is that many times they do both on the same possession. It has been rare in this series to see the Spurs come down and immediatly clear out a side for Tim Duncan on the block. They usually come down and get into their motion sets or run off a screen.

But at the end of the day, the Spurs need to make a good percentage of their shots in order to win. Whether they come off of post opportunities, the pick and roll, penetration or kick outs the bottom line is if the Spurs miss often they will simply be fishing by this weekend.

Win or go home? How about make shots or go home.

[E20]

Spurs are relying to heavily on teh three ball. May not always go for them and the Spurs do have some streaky shooters, but how can the Spurs not take a wide open three? Their personnel is composed of some of the best 3PT shooters in the league. NO's philosophy is: No easy baskets (high %) inside and we will give you all the threes we want (semi-contested). Spurs are trying to beat the Hornets from teh three point line and that's what NO wants them to do, similar to what LA did in 2004, contain the paint and have the shooters try to beat you. The Spurs need to go in attack/contact mode dive in to the lane, get fouled and make your FT's and finish strong. What I'd like to see is go 4down and instead of having Tim get doubled and pass out for a three, let's vary it up and have some backpicks/cuts going towards the rim, obviously someone will be open because of the double allowing them to cut to the basket for a higher percentage shot rather than a three, this should open up the shooters even more making it an easier three point shot.

[1369]

Making shots leads to winning games.



Film at 11.

[E20]

Also, we need Ginobili of the 2005 WCSF against the Sonics where he could just attack attack attack the paint, don't know if it is due to his injuries or if he is worn out why he is not attacking the paint more.

[SpursDynasty]

I agree. Some teams just make their shots and do nothing brilliant. Examples include the '06 Mavs and '08 Hornets.

[NewJerSpur]

Spurs are relying to heavily on teh three ball. May not always go for them and the Spurs do have some streaky shooters, but how can the Spurs not take a wide open three? Their personnel is composed of some of the best 3PT shooters in the league. NO's philosophy is: No easy baskets (high %) inside and we will give you all the threes we want (semi-contested). Spurs are trying to beat the Hornets from teh three point line and that's what NO wants them to do, similar to what LA did in 2004, contain the paint and have the shooters try to beat you. The Spurs need to go in attack/contact mode dive in to the lane, get fouled and make your FT's and finish strong. What I'd like to see is go 4down and instead of having Tim get doubled and pass out for a three, let's vary it up and have some backpicks/cuts going towards the rim, obviously someone will be open because of the double allowing them to cut to the basket for a higher percentage shot rather than a three, this should open up the shooters even more making it an easier three point shot.

The Hornets have the combo of Peja and Mo Pete like the Spurs have had Barry and Horry in recent years...although the latter two could do a bit more than just spot up for open tre's. Unfortunately the health or lack-there-of of our guys this season has REALLY hurt us this postseason...normally pop would be able to put two of the "Big 3" on the court with 3 other interchangeable outside shooters but the bench has been shortened substantially during this run; it's hard to toss guys into the lineup who have barely touched the ball for a good chunk of the season. Thus the Spurs making things as compe ive as they have been this series is enoug to marvel at. The original poster was correct: Guys just have to make shots. Timmy is doing the right thing in not forcing action again double teams and now his remaining teammates have to step up and knock down jumpers.

[E20]

Maybe we should take a page from teh D'Antoni bible and fastbreak more, for more shots/easier baskets.

[JamStone]

If you don't miss any shots, you have a very good chance of winning.

[Don Quixote]

Yeah, it's pretty easy to say "make your dang shots!" I imagine all these guys, from the biggest superstar to the 12th man, all shoot lights out in an empty gym.

It's much, much harder to do it when NBA athletes are employing sophisticated defenses designed to prevent you from doing just that -- making your shots. If you play alot of 1-on-1, or 1-on-5, you're not going to make many shots. Pro teams need to run their plays; the better they run their plays, the easier their shots become, and the more they make. That's simple.

I contend, then, that the Spurs' shooting %age is a direct result of how well they are running their offense. So, I would say to the Silver & Black ... PLAY BETTER!

[Trainwreck2100]

Don't play like for 12 minutes`

[BonnerDynasty]

Maybe the Spurs should take some high percentage shots and not bull fadeaway off balance hooks, bull "I got stuck on my pivot foot so I will throw up a brick" finley shots, bull "let's just shoot 3's isntead of driving because they are bound to start falling in the 4th....and so on.


Horrible shot selection + no confidence. It's like the completely forget how to run an offense when in N.O.

[spurscenter]

It really is simple.


Make shots and you win. Miss them and you lose.

yea because if its close, the refs, will dictate a winner, book it

[MannyIsGod]

The thing is that the Hornets are giving them wide open jumpers off almost every double team. The Spurs need to have the balls to capitalize on those. If we go down gunning on wide open jumpers then so be it. But to go down forcing the ball into the teeth of their defense is playing right into their hands.

[1Parker1]

Spurs have no one outside of the Big 3 who can come in and make shots on their own. So if one or two of the Big 3 is having an off night, it spells disaster for the rest of the team. They also don't have anyone who can come in and give you 20 points other than the Big 3. When was the last time someone other than Parker/Duncan/Ginobili gave you 20+ points?


Not only that, they showed the defensive stat in the Lakers/Jazz game last night. Out of the 8 teams left in the playoffs, Spurs rank deadlast in the postseason in opponents field goal %, allowing opponents to shoot 46%. Pop has always believed that this stat is indicative to how the team is playing defense, well Pop, they aren't doing their job.


This year's Spurs, their defense feeds off their offense, whereas in champions past, their good defense fed off their offense....especially on the road. These 3rd quarter collapses, when the Spurs aren't scoring, they aren't doing much to stop the Hornets from scoring either, that's why by the time the 4th quarter starts, the game is already put away.

[MannyIsGod]

Spurs have no one outside of the Big 3 who can come in and make shots on their own. So if one or two of the Big 3 is having an off night, it spells disaster for the rest of the team. They also don't have anyone who can come in and give you 20 points other than the Big 3. When was the last time someone other than Parker/Duncan/Ginobili gave you 20+ points?


Not only that, they showed the defensive stat in the Lakers/Jazz game last night. Out of the 8 teams left in the playoffs, Spurs rank deadlast in the postseason in opponents field goal %, allowing opponents to shoot 46%. Pop has always believed that this stat is indicative to how the team is playing defense, well Pop, they aren't doing their job.


This year's Spurs, their defense feeds off their offense, whereas in champions past, their good defense fed off their offense....especially on the road. These 3rd quarter collapses, when the Spurs aren't scoring, they aren't doing much to stop the Hornets from scoring either, that's why by the time the 4th quarter starts, the game is already put away.

To be fair look at who the Spurs have faced. You can't knock them being last when Boston has played Atlanta and Cleaveland while the Spurs get NO and Phoenix.

[florige]

Don't play like for 12 minutes`

Yeah Really!!!!!

[DarrinS]

Spurs need to be the more agressive team and attack the basket.


It seems to me that, especially Manu and Tim, have become less agressive over the past few seasons. I don't know if that is age or what, but I notice it.


Remember how fearless Manu played against the Sonics in 2005?


Now, we see Manu being in love with the 3. That's good and all, when they go in, but when they don't, they turn in to fast-break opportunities for CP3.


Also, you see Tim now and then settle for that jumper near the top of the key. It reminds me of DRob when he was in the twilight of his career.


Oh well, win this or go home, as they say.

[Peja]

I agree. Some teams just make their shots and do nothing brilliant. Examples include the '06 Mavs and '08 Hornets.

hahaha

sure ...hornets d and chris paul are nothing brilliant........ we can just shoot , thats all

[florige]

Spurs need to be the more agressive team and attack the basket.


It seems to me that, especially Manu and Tim, have become less agressive over the past few seasons. I don't know if that is age or what, but I notice it.


Remember how fearless Manu played against the Sonics in 2005?

Now, we see Manu being in love with the 3. That's good and all, when they go in, but when they don't, they turn in to fast-break opportunities for CP3.

Also, you see Tim now and then settle for that jumper near the top of the key. It reminds me of DRob when he was in the twilight of his career.


Oh well, win this or go home, as they say.

It's not the 3's that are kiliing us, it's when he shoots them. Like shooting them on the break against NO's and it rattles out is a guaranteed 2 pts for them on the other end, and probably an +1.

[DarrinS]

hahaha

sure ...hornets d and chris paul are nothing brilliant........ we can just shoot , thats all

Hornets have two all-star players. Beyond that, nothing special, just some scrubs playing out of their minds. Most of those guys would ride pine on other teams. CP3 makes them better. Chris Chandler? WTF can this guy do besides throw down alley oops from CP3? I guess he's the master of the moving pic.

[VaSpursFan]

how about this...the Spurs need to come out after halftime in NO and go for the kill. Every game in NO has practically been the same; Spurs lead at halftime, crappy 3rd...game over. string together a full 48 mins in NO with maximum effort is all that i ask for. if we go down, tip your hats but it's really disappointing to see us getting punched in the mouth and we just fold.

[cjjr72984]

Chris Chandler? WTF can this guy do besides throw down alley oops from CP3? I guess he's the master of the moving pic.

His name is Tyson you dumbass. And what else does he do besides alley-oops? How about being the leading offensive rebounder in the league as well as average 11.8 pts, 11.7 rebounds, and a block per game. His rebounding and defense helps the hornets out in so many ways. That's why the hornets are a good team. They have players that help them out in different ways.

[florige]

Hornets have two all-star players. Beyond that, nothing special, just some scrubs playing out of their minds. Most of those guys would ride pine on other teams. CP3 makes them better. Chris Chandler? WTF can this guy do besides throw down alley oops from CP3? I guess he's the master of the moving pic.

That is what pisses me off about this series. Everytime I see that bum Peterson hit a shot I cringe. And all the shots that bum manages to hit always seem to be run killing shots, or dagger shots.

[ambchang]

The Hornets defense is like Jerkyl and Hyde, it has great rotations and close outs at home, but they breakdown quickly on the road, part of it comes as being a young team, but the Spurs have to attack the rim aggressively all night, they can't settle for jumpshots when they think that they are not getting calls.

Chandler is obviously key to the defense of the Hornets, so take that ball at him, this is how you deal with a shot blocking. Put up weak stuff and fade away from him will only result in miss/blocked shots.

Go Spurs, take care of business at home.

[Ginofan]

His name is Tyson you dumbass. And what else does he do besides alley-oops? How about being the leading offensive rebounder in the league as well as average 11.8 pts, 11.7 rebounds, and a block per game. His rebounding and defense helps the hornets out in so many ways. That's why the hornets are a good team. They have players that help them out in different ways.

BFD

You think he was jack before he met Chris Fall? Heck no.