Reply With Quote
Speaking of "abomination" . . . the Abomination character looks too fake.
I think this movie will be a let down.
This looks like it's going to be alot better than the other abomination....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUpOhM8Hxx0
Speaking of "abomination" . . . the Abomination character looks too fake.
I think this movie will be a let down.
He kinda reminds me of that Resident Evil Apocolypse character.
At least the story line looks a whole lot better. The longer the first movie went on the worse it got.
I can understand that argument, but I still think the first one was not all that bad.
The new Hulk and Abomination look fake, though. I don't think it's an improvement.
Agreed. Why can't characters remain simple? Why must they always be completely over the top in appearance?
Norton could deliver a classic performance and make this watchable. I just don't know how, because to me, it looks just as lame as the first attempt.
Yea, it's sad that Norton will probably deliver a great performance as Bruce Banner only to be ed up with ty graphics.
Before this came out I was under the impression that they were not going with anymore of that animatrix crap with the characters. I thought they were going with a realer looking Hulk.
It's automatically better cuz William Hurt is in it!!! But why don't they ever do something with the Hulk's hair?! It always looks a bit too much like the Jolly Green Giant. I think.
As much as I hated the Fantastic Four movies, and I really did HATE them, I think they had the right idea by doing The Thing with a rubber suit, rather than CG. There's just something about installing a computer generated character into a "real" world that I find really hard to watch for more than a few seconds at a time.
Agreed.
This one looks even worse than the Ang Lee fest. The only thing that would save this movie would be to cast Jake Gylenhaal as a second Hulk, and the two Hulks have a spit-lube scene in a tent. I'd pay money to see that.
William Hurt is overrated.It's automatically better cuz William Hurt is in it!!! But why don't they ever do something with the Hulk's hair?! It always looks a bit too much like the Jolly Green Giant. I think.
go watch Altered States again.
Jennifer Connelly>>>>>>>>>>>Liv Tyler
And sexy as , with an even sexier voice.
and playing a supporting role so no one cares, this movie is going to suck bottom line. They need to give up on this movie. The "new" hulk looks too much like the old one. From the trailer this movie looks pretty much like the same movie.
....
Lets wait and see how the storyline is first. This one looks better as far as that goes.
I do like Norton better than Bana as far as acting ability. I think abomination is a better enemy than the first one had, I dont even know his name, but that stupid lighting thing.
Man that crap made entirely no sense. But I'm hoping that Norton, and the improved storyline will make up for that CG stuff.
So?!? He's still wonderful.
if you say, but he still wont make this movie.
I never said he would make this movie; I just said his presence will make this movie better than the last one!!! Sheesh! Like to pick on me much?!
I never said he would make this movie; I just said his presence will make this movie better than the last one!!! Sheesh! Like to pick on me much?!
Better for you!! If I would watch movies based on hot chicks then I would say The Fast and the Furious movies were good, but THEY WEREN'T!!
Man, am I the only one psyched for this thing? I think the CGI looks way ahead of the last one IMO, and I like the look for the new Abomination. It kind of reminds me of the creepy half human/half alien from Aliens: Resurrection.
And sorry Mrs. M, but when I first heard of this one I went down the cast list and William Hurt was the only one where I didn't think there would be some improvement. Sam Elliott was probably the only good part of the last one.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
