Reply With Quote
So does she think high-energy beam weapons caused Hurricane Erin too?
A new groundbreaking paper by former Clemson University Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Dr Judy Wood, on Hurricane Erin on 9/11 has been published on her personal website: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/
A press release by Andrew Johnson regarding this paper has been published as well:
New Study by former Professor Examines Hurricane Erin on 9/11/01
Dr. Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering, has posted a new study which highlights the possible links between events on 9/11 and the occurrence in the Atlantic ocean of Hurricane Erin.
continued...
http://www.prlog.org/10073301-new-st...n-9-11-01.html
So does she think high-energy beam weapons caused Hurricane Erin too?
A Professor of Mechanical Engineering versus Chumpdumper who can't do basic integral Calculus...who to believe...who to believe....The new study, (posted at http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin) considers the “Field Effects” associated with Hurricanes and energy effects involved in destruction of the World Trade Centre complex in New York City on 9/11. Dr. Wood’s extensive research has already cataloged a substantial range of evidence of very unusual effects at the WTC site on and since 9/11. The preponderance of this evidence points to the use of one or more Directed Energy Weapons in the destruction of the WTC buildings. This general conclusion has been the focal point of her Qui Tam Case against NIST’s contractors. The defendants are accused of committing fraud, including "wilful indifference" which resulted in them presenting a deceptive analysis and false data constructs, which were then used to compile the NCSTAR1 reports (See http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/N..._Tam_Wood.html) .
You don't believe anything.
Seriously, what do you BELIEVE really happened on 9/11?
Maybe she thinks the hurricane powered the energy beam weapon she claims blew up the WTC buildings.
I guess her students at Clemson could explain it -- if she was still a professor.
After some research, it's pretty evident she has no clue how DEWs work nor can she effectively relate how they could have been used in the 9-11 attacks...this is all you need to see..
Count her...completely discredited...
But she was an engineering professor!
....after watching a hour of her public appearances and interview with Dr. Greg Jenkins one has to wonder what Clemson University was thinking....
Really, it took you an hour to figure out she was a loon? It took me five seconds and I can't even do basic integral calculus.
Perhaps I'm just more willing to give people the benefit of the doubt...but more importantly there are many questions the 9-11 commission left unanswered and like crop circles or UFOs I'm willing to look at theories a little more seriously than you are and see if they pass the smell test....
Crop circles were made by humans.
UFOs? Not interested. If space aliens want to contact me, I'm easy enough to find.
Most of the 9/11 questions have been reasonably answered in the many investigations that have taken place. If you want people to believe some other theory, you need some other theory to believe.
What's your theory?
:Lmao
Oh man - people have no idea the amount of energy being released in a hurricane if they even think about linking it to 9/11.
... to even hire this nutcase in the first place.
I agree.
Obviously a NWO agent planted by the government to discredit the 9-11 movement.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 05-21-2008 at 10:14 AM.
... she probably even signed the truther pe ion for "scientists and architects, along with IP Freely, Garlemaballs Magee, and E. Nourmouspenis.
We are going to use this machine to destroy Irans nuclear plants.
Right dan? Bush has got it right this time.....yeah baby.
I haven't been able to verify it yet, but word is she spent several months in a coma after being hit by a car while jogging. That or garden variety schizophrenia would explain a lot.... to even hire this nutcase in the first place.
I agree.
Obviously a NWO agent planted by the government to discredit the 9-11 movement.
Still got an hour of dan's time. He's fair and balanced.
I, for one, appreciate the learned and relevant input BasketballDan brings to this board. He definitely gives me a lot to think about.
So ... Dan ... do you plan to go to the Convention this August? Are the masses of like-minded people planning some sort of get-together there? I hope so, because I think you and your friends have something to say to the DNC and the public, and should try your best to get it out to the M$M, which doesn't want your message to get out. They're in Clinton's pocket for sure.
But I'd love for you to get to go to Denver.
x 1,000,000,000 @ Crop circles
Are you serious?
But was the energy beam weapon reverse-engubeered from flying saucer technology?
Nonsense she was discredited by other truthers....not by the 911 faith movement.....Obviously a NWO agent planted by the government to discredit the 9-11 movement.
Right, no one but other nutters would even bother "researching" her claims.
Forget all the cult talk by RG and the other members of his 911 faith movement that has come to dominate the other 911 thread, this sentiment above by Chumpy is exactly why the 911 movement continues to thrive....if we had a serious investigation into the events that led up to 911 then we could prove or disprove theories in a scientifically-backed and carefully researched manner instead of in RG's (and the 911 faith movements) simplistic and hap-hazard manner....maybe, just maybe more people could finally come to a consensus about what really happened...
....otherwise, claiming that your right when you've failed to convince anyone that thought differently from the beginning is a shallow victory...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
