Reply With Quote
Nice job. DCrawford would be a good ref to help keep Bowen out of foul trouble, hopefully. Even though it does bring back .4 memories
P.S.
Has Scott Foster always been as bad as he was last night? Javie and Bavetta were solid. Foster was pathetic.
I have no idea who the three officials for Game 1 will be, but my morning before guess is that Dan Crawford will be the lead official for Game 1.
I'm assuming the league will have 6 crew chiefs in this round, too: Bavetta, D. Crawford, J. Crawford, Javie, Rush, Salvatore. Having just seen Bavetta and Javie last night, I think you can count them out. Joey's working tonight in Boston, so he's out, too.
That leaves D. Crawford, Rush, and Salvatore. Of the 6 crew chiefs, only the Crawfords didn't work a Game 7 in the 2nd round. Joey gets the next game -- Game 1 of the ECF -- so I'm thinking that Danny gets the game after that one -- Game 1 of the WCF.
Just a guess.
No clue on the other two, other than that we can be sure it won't be Greg Willard, Mark Wunderlich, or Scott Foster. I'm also pretty sure that it won't include Bob Delaney or Tom Washington, since each has worked a game in LA in the last two weeks.
Nice job. DCrawford would be a good ref to help keep Bowen out of foul trouble, hopefully. Even though it does bring back .4 memories
P.S.
Has Scott Foster always been as bad as he was last night? Javie and Bavetta were solid. Foster was pathetic.
Just please lord... no Dork Bavetta....and no Tim's best friend- Joey Crawford...
Joey Crawford should not ever ref a Spurs game again.
Or any NBA game at that
javie is my new favorite road ref.
We'll see if I'm right -- it could just as easily be Ed Rush or Bennett Salvatore.Nice job. DCrawford would be a good ref to help keep Bowen out of foul trouble, hopefully. Even though it does bring back .4 memories
I'd fully expect to see Salvatore in one of the games in LA in this series, since he worked so recently in San Antonio.
I thought Javie and Bavetta were extraordinarily good last night. Truly deserving of their status as elite officials. Bavetta had one fairly questionable call, but that happens. He understood not to interject himself into the game and let the teams decide it.
I agree about Foster and still wonder why he got the nod to call Game 7. As I noted elsewhere, the guys who call Game 7's by this point in the playoffs are the officials who will be calling Finals games (Tom Washington in 2004 was the last official without Finals experience to call a 2nd round Game 7). I'd be very surprised if Foster has reached that level (there would only seem to be room for 2 additions to the Finals roster from last year and one of those will undoubtedly be Joey Crawford), and nothing about his performance last night would suggest that he has. He seemed to be guessing far too much on his calls. It was disappointing because I generally think Foster's a solid official who will likely be in the Finals group within the next few years.
If things get heated with Joey Crawford again, you have to expect the league will look into whether he officiates another spurs game this year. I know Stern has said he has no reason to leave him out, but the nba doesn't need anymore negative officiating distractions the remainder of these playoffs.
All I hope for is Joey Crawford as the lead official in Game 3. I hope he doesn't ref Game 1 or 2.
I'd like to get Javie done with in Game 1.
Joey Crawford should not be allowed at Spurs games for the remainder of the post-season. Not after the travesty of game 5. I thought he was fair in the Suns series, and over the course of the season - but after that game 5, I never want to see him again.
Meh, Joey is Joey. I don't think the league should get itself in the business of saying that certain officials won't work the games of a particular team -- if the official is miscalling games then he shouldn't work any games; if a team feels as though there's an agenda, the league should investigate. At the end of the day, though, the Spurs don't win or lose games because of officials.
Besides, Joey's going to be a Finals official again this year and they can't exactly keep him from calling Spurs games at that point if the Spurs manage to reach the Finals again.
I agree that game 1 will likely be Danny and that is a good thing.
I hope we draw Salvatore at home.
D. Crawford
J. Clark
B. Delaney
I've just checked it and said
YES!!!
Amen to that. He needs to be put out to pasture.
We probably will get javie for 2nd game.
How do yo feel about his chances?
2nd game of the det-bos series will be officiated by or Bennet as I assume.
But that's just a thinking
can you post that link for future reference?
2 out of 3 ain't bad. Don't care for Delaney in this spot, but oh well.
Yeah, I'm surprised that Delaney got this game. Apparently, some of the rules aren't as ironclad as they've been in the past.
P.S.-- Does anyone else think that the recent allegations made by Donaghy are actually likely to be helpful in terms of assuring that these high-profile games are called a bit more evenly?
Delaney is a Circle of 7 Fixer Ref and probably the worst ref in the league today.
Jim Clark was atrocious in favor of Utah in Game 1 of that series, he was just abysmal.
Danny Crawford is hit or miss, he misses a lot of calls and does way too much talking with the players instead of concentrating on the game.
Overall, a very suspect crew and pretty much a best case scenario for the *purs.
Because, of course, the only way that the Spurs could possibly win a game in Los Angeles is by virtue of a fix, right?
Yes, much like the 35-12 FT attempt differential fix job in Game 1 of the 2003 series that unjustly swung the series in your team's favor.Because, of course, the only way that the Spurs could possibly win a game in Los Angeles is by virtue of a fix, right?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=230505024
I'm still wondering when Laker Lanny will actually admit that the Spurs are truly capable of simply outplaying his Lakers in a playoff game.
I'm sure that the Spurs wouldn't have taken Game 6 in 2003 without the manipulation skills of Bavetta and Joey Crawford inuring to their benefit.
Well done, FWD!
I understand what you are saying, and I agree with the principle behind it. I don't know if I can agree that Joey should continue reffing if he won't call a game appropriately. I feel pretty strongly about that game 5. I'll give him another chance at redemption, though, and then we'll see. If an official has such a personality conflict with one team (whoever the team is - even if that would be beneficial to the Spurs) they shouldn't be a high level official anymore.
Yes, it is true that games are not won or lost by officials, though a well-timed bad call can swing a close game (see the foul on Tim Duncan, who had the temerity to let Dirk Nowitski step on his feet). That was not the end of the game, had better plays been made earlier, had other shots fallen, they could have won - but it might as well have ended it.
That's true. I still hate him and would prefer that if he cannot leave his personality conflicts off the court that he not be allowed to officiate Finals games.
But . . . but . . . but . . . that interferes with my conspiracy theories! Pain is shooting through the tin foil hat. . .
Ok, in reality - I don't know. I think it helps. I hope these games will be fairly called anyway; I expect fewer egregrious calls than in the past. But there are a lot of subtle ways in which officials can influence a game and/or a series. Like all the homecooking in the semis. I think that the league is eager for the stain of the ref scandal to go away, but they are likewise eager to see anything but Spurs/Pistons II. Whether that will be felt as an influence in calls remains to be seen (I don't actually believe a fix is in).
I'm getting better at it. . . . .
I think that if there ends up being a game that looks a lot like Game 6 of SAC/LAL in 2002, the lid will blow off the Donaghy thing and the world is going to look really closely at what Donaghy is saying. I think that's true without regard to who might benefit from a travesty like that. As such, I wouldn't expect anything that would remotely reach that level, which should be a great relief to basketball fans everywhere.
It's the interesting cloud that looms over the NBA right now, to me. There was something in the way that David Stern responded yesterday to questions about Donaghy's assertions that got me wondering about this -- it was as if he was both angry and unsure about the effects of this. I thought the league's announced desire to talk with Donaghy again was also an interestingly-timed request.
I'm still convinced that there is no conspiracy and that the NBA is truly on the up-and-up, even if it is sometimes subject to officiating cliches favoring superstars or home teams or whatever else. It would sadden me to no end to learn that Donaghy is correct and I hope that he's not; but if his assertions compel the league to take additional steps to ensure absolutely that games are officiated without an interest in personalities or ratings, that would be the best result that could come out of this whole mess.
By the way, Lakers fans screaming about "fixes" amuse me to no end.
Good Job FWD. You are in Timvp status now.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
