Not a problem. Kobe is undoubtedly the best, most complete player on the planet. His combination of offensive and defensive skills are unsurpassed, and I am on record in this forum as acknowledging that he toyed with the Spurs in the first game of this series. However, AFTER Kobe, the Lakers fail the talent test vs. the Hornets.
While it is true that the Hornets beat a DISPIRITED Dallas team, they did so handily, and with as little experience as they had, quite impressively. The Hornets' talent and incredibly focused point guard ( who, IMO, should have gotten MVP this year instead of Kobe who hasn't been able to lead his team out of the first round until he got Pau Gasol next to him ) kept a young, green team in the race against the defending NBA champions for 7 games. David West, Tyson Chandler and Chris Paul will some day make mince meat out of the L.A. big three of Bryant, Gasol, and Odom.
Gasol cannot handle Duncan 1 on 1 (neither could Chandler this year, but he will be much, much better next year). Odom is good, but not great. As I indicated before, the difference for the Lakers is Jackson, and Kobe's own maturation process. BUT...remember, please, that Kobe, for all his talent, was unable to put this team on his back after Shaq left. Kobe really thought he could do that. Paul almost did it by himself this year, and he is only 23 years old and doesn't have the advantage of Jackson coaching him. Next year, everybody in the league needs to look out for N.O. (and that includes the Spurs). If N.O. had a better coach, they might have taken out the Spurs this year.
So...that's why the Lakers are not as good as the Hornets.