Reply With Quote
Both?...NO...Pietrus probably more so because of the French connection.
Childress and Pietrus? is it possible to get both... I know dreaming...
If not both, then which one? Childress plays great D, has great hops, athletic, and young... Pietrus Plays decent D, young, athletic, buddies with Parker..
Both?...NO...Pietrus probably more so because of the French connection.
probobly not both... pietrus yes. maybe another player too but i dont think childress too
Id love to get Pietrus. We get him and let him and Manu handle the 2 gaurd duties. Then when Bowen leaves he can play SF with Udoka off the bench.
I'd rather have Azubuike or JR than Pietrus.
Is Pietrus a slasher and can he create his own shot?
knew I was dreaming... oh well.. Pietrus will be a good role player...Childress will probably be too expensive anyhow. Just think Childress would have a better shot at being a starter of the two...
Pietrus is most likely because he's an unrestricted FA, but getting both is impossible.
Spurs' top target should be JR Smith. He is more than a MLE player, but he will probably end up with the MLE given Denver's lux tax situation.
If not him, I really like the idea of Pargo. He fits Spurs basketball. That would give TP a dependable backup for the next 4 seasons. Plus he's an unrestricted FA.
After that, I think Matt Barnes makes a lot of sense. Maybe the Spurs could pull off a sign and trade with Golden State for Barnes and keep the MLE free for Smith or Pargo. Barnes figures to be an odd man out in Oakland.
--------------------------------
Yea actually Pargo would be a good addition... good backup for Tony...I think JR Smith would be tough to get... Denver probably wants to keep him. Not too high on Barnes...
Childress is the best, IMO, but Atlanta won't let him go.
I like the idea of Pargo, too.
S&T for Barnes using Bonner would be nice.
Barnes caught my attention in the series against dallas. he can sure ing shoot and score. we need that
Matt Barnes has too many tatoos to be a Spur (and you think I'm kidding).
Pietrus looks intriguing. Three questions:
(1) Can he go to the rack?
(2) Can he create his own shot?
(3) Can he (will he) defend?
Who cares if he has tatoos that doesnt decide how he plays
We used to have Cherokee Parks... He had the most tats in the league... more than iverson
I rest my case.
He can go to the rack and defend, but I don't know about creating his own shot.
Pietrus = low basketball IQ, but good finisher and decent 3pt shooter
yes
no
yes
Two outta three ain't bad -- let's get him!
No. Childress is restricted and will demand at least the MLE. Pietrus, on his own, we could get, if we wanted.
Cherokee parks was a joke
matt barnes aint a joke
ha-ha! yea I would be happy with him... Parker is probably over there twisting the FO's arm to bring him on board... lol!
True about Barnes' shot though... he can shoot the lights out... gets on some real hot streaks and plays some pretty decent D...
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/h_OosSMj50Y&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/h_OosSMj50Y&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
