Reply With Quote
Seriously,
Splitter and Scola >> nothing
This is Scola II in its ultimate effect. Actually I guess it would be worse if somehow he ends up on the Mavs in a couple of years. But give RC time.
tpark and buddy holly are typical Americans with their heads up their asses and can't find a ing light.
blind ass mofos, please tell you don't vote, cuz you have no got damn clue.
Seriously,
Splitter and Scola >> nothing
This is Scola II in its ultimate effect. Actually I guess it would be worse if somehow he ends up on the Mavs in a couple of years. But give RC time.
Or, howabout you tell me/link it.
I'm not reading the 60 page Scola thread to see the fuzzy math.
just explain it for the guy since you've seen it 50 times.
Chump has explained that Scola would have cost $20 million more than Bonner? What the !
you all are arguing about Scola? ... you all Bonner and Malik Rose...
, you guys kill me..
First off munchkin, the tax is on hotels/motels and rental cars. Second, you stated the Spurs had people raise taxes, well, no they didn't. People on their own decided to vote yes on the tax. Third, it wasn't to raise the tax, just extend the same tax in use.how am I off? Gas goes up, taxes goes up. Cost of goods goes up, taxes go up.
If you could count to ing 10, you might see that a larger amount of your income is going to taxes. Everybody is winning but you.
How hard is that to understand?
I've a hard time blaming Spurs FO this failure. It' all on Splitter.
Splitter asked NBA team to draft him last year, he made some interview with them before the draft and told that he can go in NBA in 2009. When you do that and if you respect a little NBA franchises, you come in NBA in 2009. Draft picks are an investment for NBA teams and if you ask them to invest on you, you had to stick to your words.
F*** you Splitter.
He can't, because he's full of .
not more.
He explained though the luxury tax hit with Scola though.
Charming.
I always knew Chump was a dummy.
Bonner made less than $250K less than Scola this season.
Well, I can vote because I am taller than the line at the door.
I'm also smart enough to know that an extension isn't the same as a raise.
It wasn't $20 million but the difference between Bonner and Scola wasn't just $300K. You also have to add in the money they saved dumping Butler and the cash the Rockets through in.
You'd have to ask one of the Pro Scola Trade posters such as ChumpDumper, whottt or Bruno for specifics. Or search.
I forgot.
When you wake up tomorrow, you're dumb ass will be paying more taxes.
same different day...typical
He can't be better than a wasted pick, because he IS one.
But but but that would have made the Spurs pay $20 million in luxury tax fines.
$2 milliion + $300K x 2 = $20 million. [/Tpark]
Wouldn't it add fuel to the fire if someone found out the NBA was subsidizing part of the Tau contract?
Anyway, the Spurs can't afford to blow any more draft picks on players who don't ever sign with the team.
Dammit, who told him about the plan?
I was also very against that trade from the beginning as well.
I just got over it quicker than alot of other people apparently.
How? Did they pass more taxes while I slept?When you wake up tomorrow, you're dumb ass will be paying more taxes.
same different day...typical
Seriously, move out of that meth lab you call a home, that is ing up your brain.
Well, I think the Spurs will probably pay about $2 million in luxury tax now. And they would have probably paid an extra $250K with Scola instead of Bonner this year. There's no $20 million.
When you wake up tomorrow, you're dumb ass will be paying more taxes.
same different day...typical
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
