We should give the trade exception(s) to a team willing to take on Bonner contract.
By "not very good" I meant that he'd have a difficult time cracking the rotation--but with Fin and Horry on the move, we should be thinking in terms of rotation quality players. May not be possible, but that should be the goal. Otherwise, it's probably isn't worth the salary or roster space.
Although, players like Almond and Cook would be Austin eligible and might be worth a 14th or 15th spot for that reason.
Someone like Balkman or Sergio could find a role in the rotation.
We should give the trade exception(s) to a team willing to take on Bonner contract.
Someone more knowledgable could address this but I don't think you can package an exception with a player (Bonner). The exception has to be sent on it's own or with picks.
Regarding ex-Knicks on the roster, didn't Nazr come from the Knicks?
More knowledge isn't needed. The trade exception can't be combined with another player, as you write.
Yes, Nazr came from the Knicks and was a helpful in winning a championship.
Almond and Belinelli seem like perfect guys to go after, but neither will be cheap. Both can probably step in and score right from the get go.
But both were 1st round picks just last year and both were gone by the time the Spurs picked. Their value is less than it was just 12 months ago -- great time to strike (but possibly unrealistic to actually pull it off).
Great Job, but essentially you're telling us we're screwed.
I'm more pessimistic about both these guys. In the event that we landed them with the TE, I suspect they'd spend the season in Austin. Even if they could score, the other aspects of their game, especially defense, seem inadequate. I'd rather Chandler or Balkman--Chandler to the Toros or Balkman as a high energy swing 8th man.
I wanted Mo Almond to be drafted last year but the Jazz snagged him earlier. Speaking of the Jazz, there is a team that has done a good job quietly of picking up talent, their FO deserves some props for the signings, draft picks and trades they have pulled off especially for a small market team.
Out of those I like:
Cook
Chandler
Balkman
Cook fits the profile of what you would like out of a PG in the Spurs' system. Big, physical, and can score. Playmaking abilities aren't as important. You could play him with Tony against smaller backcourts.
Chandler and Balkman would be good young role players for the Spurs. If you think that Udoka can see a hefty portion of his minutes at the two either of them makes sense.
#45+Udrih exception should get us Balkman.
You guys know better than I but would Balkman have the potential to be the Bowen Jr.?
Re: Udoka's minutes, I'd rather see him pick up time as a small ball 4. He provides some spacing and better D than Bonner. I'm still for a more creative scorer at the 2, and I don't want Udoka to cut into that players minutes.
Maybe, but not likely. Balkman is a hard worker and plays with heart, which is key to D. He's a guy that many didn't believe belonged in the league. When Zeke drafted him he said he saw a lot of Dennis Rodman--in the on the floor sense--in him. I think he's a guy that could get a steal, a block, 5 rebounds, a hustle save, and some clean up scores in 15 minutes a game. He's also quick and long and would match up well in spot time against players like David West and Boris Diaw. It'd be a steal if we could get him for the trade exception.
Mail it in to R.C ^^
Either 1)NY's management still sucks, 2)your wrong or 3)I'm crazy...
He played 24% of available minutes last year...He rebounds strongly for an SF, doesn't get plays called for him (ie. lives off scraps offensively) and plays decent D. According to David Berri's wins produced methodology, he was NY's second best player (after D. Lee) with WP/48 of .213
I'd certainly make that trade if I was SA. I would also happily offer Bonner + #45 for him...(although this would require further Salary cap shenanigans to get by the trade rules). I would also do something like Splitters Rights + #45 + TE for him.
I'm not sure I'd offer #26. I'd wait until draft day and see what was on the board before doing so...
Splitters rights should not be traded. That is silly. I would hope the FO learned their lesson about trading a player's rights when they are at their lowest value already.
Splitter plays in SA in the future or he stays over in Spain. Period.
Ramon Sessions, the pg from the bucks, might be available for the Kurt Thomas trade exception. With how well he played at the end of the year, he is definitely worth a gamble.
The Kurt Thomas exception is <500K. We're not getting anyone with that.
I think Sessions makes a little over 450,000 a year, he is a rookie that just came up from the D-League.
I'd like Belinelli or Cook or Sean Williams or Carney
sessions will make about 711K next season. and the bucks like him, so why are they giving him away for nothing?
Yea, but even a D-League standout should be able to reel in at least 800,000 a year.
i guess since we cant go back in the past. this question doesnt really matter. but ill ask anyways.......say we dont have that 1.87 million exception on beno, cos we kept him and never had to waste games on helping mighty mouse learn the system, when tony got hurt.........would we have won homecourt advantage and still be playing?
I like Shawne Williams. He's good and young. Can improve in the Spurs system
None of those guys seem worth a damn
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)