So should we be upset that the Spurs picked this guy at 28?
Hopefully he'll be ready to come over in 2010.
So should we be upset that the Spurs picked this guy at 28?
Yes.
"FAIL" or whatever.
See the bright side.
timvp will stay timvp and won't become splittervp.
Is Hollinger doing nothing more than projecting out his Tau stats from last season on a 48 minute basis?
Wrong.
"Epic Fail"![]()
Not because of ability. He was a talented player obviously. The contract situation made him available in the first place.
The Spurs have first shot if he wants to play with the big boys down the road.
He was good enough to contribute now and that won't happen. That is the problem.
And the Spurs were supposed to know all of this a year ago.
Given that is only a one year sample size but I'll hand it to Hollinger that his projections were pretty accurate.
Which sucks considering he has Splitter rated better than everyone. According to Hollinger, Splitter would have gone third overall in this draft.
![]()
Yeah the notion that RC " ed up" with this pick is a misnomer.
He picked a great player. It just sucks the rookie scale got in the way.
Had he came over and played as it showed above, AND, Ian played also and they drafted a Mario Chalmers, and signed a JR Smith, this team would've been unbeatable.
Quit it timvp!!! We're already in the dumps about not going to the NBA Championship. Splitter taking more money to stay in Europe was salt on the wound.
So keep his rights and see how he feels about making the jump in 2010. The Lux Tax shouldn't be a concern that summer. Perhaps with a couple of years at his new salary that will be enough for him to stomach taking the NBA rookie contract...if he indeed ever wants to play in the NBA.
Or maybe Ian's PER will be 100.8 then and we won't care.
I wonder what his projections from NBDL to NBA are![]()
No they didn't know a year ago. From the time they drafted TS until the first of this month, it was generally assumed on both sides he would be here. It just hurts the cause to miss out on a good player, that's all.
I think it was a good pick given the information available in June of 2007.
Only 20-30% of the guys that are drafted in the first round in a particular year turn out to be quality players anyway.
TS was way better than the 28th best player available.
What's making it even worse is that we did not got the european Championship vbookies![]()
He was available because of his contract. Spurs took a gamble. Maybe it'll pay off in 2010. Perhaps never.
we'll be fine. we'll adjust and be solid contenders with realistic hopes/expectations of winning again...as usual
Thank G.B. for making our dollar valuation worthless - just goes to show, you can stay away from the political forum, but the political forum won't say away from you....
Thank you for polluting our forum with your idiocy.
the mistake wasn't the gamble on Splitter, it was the gamble that Splitter made Scola frivolous.
If I remember correctly Tiago was a projected mid first round pick. And he fell all the way to us. Which now makes me wonder if SA maybe knew what other teams knew, but decided to take the chance anyways? Knew = Tiago might just resign in Europe.
"our" forum
.........Yeah, kinda like 'those' people....
Way to twist something into a racist connotation jerkoff.
Pop only spoke the truth. Splitters decision was common sense.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)