Reply With Quote
You're a ing idiot. There's also a reason they haven't been able to repeat. BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T HAD A DRAFT PICK WORK OUT SINCE PARKER
Last time people were so pissed off about a pick was Tony Parker.
Theres a reason the Spurs have won 4 championships while you're in your moms garage blogging about how sad you are
You're a ing idiot. There's also a reason they haven't been able to repeat. BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T HAD A DRAFT PICK WORK OUT SINCE PARKER
Also, Parker was before the Scola and Splitter....debacles.
Well, he is American -- isn't he?
Spurs better keep this guy . he looks good
Its not them taking Hill that pisses people off its taking a guy at 26 who no one had coming off the board until 39th at the earliest....get someone at 26 and Hill probably still there at 45 or trade two 2nd rounders and move up...If we are that much smarter than everyone else then lets take a full advantage of it! Just makes no sense even if this guy turns out to be a great backup to TP
TP is quick
George is really slow
winner winner chicken dinner
Oh so because the mock drafts had him at around the 39th spot that means it's a pick?
If the analysts were so smart they would be general managers.
Hill had a pretty good 3/4 court time.
Horrible lane agility.
TP plays no D.
George does.
Its hard to find a player picking this low year, year in and year out. And the reason we pick so low every year is that we have a great team. Can't believe your complaining because they can't repeat. Like repeating is so easy. Do you expect the Spurs to find a hall of fame player at pick #26? George Hill, the Spurs pick, is a solid combo guard, who has a good chance to be a defensive stopper at the pg position for the Spurs. He averaged 20 ppg for IUPUI this past year. He's a solid prospect.
TP is married to a celebrity
Hill is married to RC Buford
20 PPG FOR IUPUI??? Wow you must follow that team and know they were the class of the league!
I don't expect them to find a hall of famer dumbass and I didn't say thats what I expected. I expected them to take the best player available that fits our needs. IMO that was CDR or Chalmers (proven guy in the clutch, fast hands) instead we get a guy that could've been had 20 picks later. I can't stand the assholes on this board that think just because you criticize the team then you're an idiot because hey they know so much better what to do with picks than any of us ever could. Someone put the last 10 draft picks of ours up please so we can see the fruits of the NBA draft for our club.
There's got to be a trade here.
At 45, excellent pick. At 26? no. We passed on Green, Arthur, Chalmers, CDR!
If Presti was still here I would be confident in that statement...right now after George Hill...Im not sure anymore but I PRAY there is a trade announced soon
Arthur falls in our laps.....and there he goes...
Wow Fajita boy you got quite a little potty mouth. Maybe if acted like 18 or older, instead of 10, people might respect your opinions. IMO the Spurs wanted this guy along. They brought him in for a workout and they, the Spurs, did not bring in CDR, or Chalmers for a workout. I would of been okay with either of the 2, but the Spurs obviously like Hill. Plus, if these 2 guys are so clutch, why haven't they been drafted yet? Look up Hill's profile on NBA.com. He is a solid prospect.
I don't expect them to find a hall of famer dumbass and I didn't say thats what I expected. I expected them to take the best player available that fits our needs. IMO that was CDR or Chalmers (proven guy in the clutch, fast hands) instead we get a guy that could've been had 20 picks later. I can't stand the assholes on this board that think just because you criticize the team then you're an idiot because hey they know so much better what to do with picks than any of us ever could. Someone put the last 10 draft picks of ours up please so we can see the fruits of the NBA draft for our club.
Fajita boy...Good one
I don't mind if the Spurs wanted Hill all along idiot do you not get that? They could have moved down in the draft and taken him later on and at least got something else in return. Do you not understand how drafts work or what? People act like we're not aloud to question the FO's moves after what they have done with this team the last few years in the draft
Yeah, ing years ago.
Well, junior if you paid attention to the pre-draft coverage, you would know that the Spurs sent out a email today at 3:30 p.m. EST, to every NBA team, trying to move their 26th pick. They had no takers, so they used their pick on the guy they wanted. So your trade down theory is wrong. Plus my questioning your opinion has nothing to do with my defending the Spurs FO. I too have questioned alot of their draft moves in the past several years. This is all about your thread. Hey maybe your actual basketball IQ needs to catch up with your perceived basketball IQ.Fajita boy...Good one
I don't mind if the Spurs wanted Hill all along idiot do you not get that? They could have moved down in the draft and taken him later on and at least got something else in return. Do you not understand how drafts work or what? People act like we're not aloud to question the FO's moves after what they have done with this team the last few years in the draft
Even if they couldn't move down you still take a proven guy in Chalmers if you're drafting for the PG position.
Apparently the only place you get your information is from ESPN. And what thread are you talking about dumbass? I didn't start a thread. Maybe your ACTUAL IQ needs to catch up with your perceived basketball IQ.
ESPN is a pretty good source. Where might you get your information from? Your best friend Clarence during recess?
Apparently you've never heard of Jonathan Chow.
Anyways dumbass, ESPN is such a great source that they had us taking 4 different guys the last 4 days.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
