Reply With Quote
Is he serious?
well at least we got NJ to pick anderson.
Is he serious?
I suppose scoring is why they took Hill over Chalmers.
people still worship us for drafting tony and manu..but that was like 10 years ago!!!
Ok, if the Spurs keep this guy, I'm pretty sure Pop will do a Stodamire on him. Early in the season his ass will be asked to score score and score some more.
because we didn't get the best, midge.
you're aiming for "solid"...good luck winning a le with "solid" first round draft picks. you have to draft better than everyone else to win also.
chalmers / cdr are better than solid. you have nothing suggesting george hill was a better pick than those guys.
that seems obvious, but maybe you're a homer.
Apparently a lot of other teams don't think they are better than solid. They still haven't been picked.
This is going to be an excellent thread to bump the first time this guy scores more than 10 points.
Now, he may not score more than 11, but it still will be fun.
Again I think you should take into account the needs of those teams before talking about them passing on those guys
? is right.
I've calmed down a little now...
I only know what I see on youtube. This guy looks like he can create his own shots and shoot. What about his defense? Chalmers would have been a better pick for a PG.
One need is scoring and they got Hill.
Pop was actually right this time around. "Don't expect an impact player"Why the didn't they take CDR or Chalmers? in Spurs
They need to tea bag RC!
is this guy meant to be our monte elis? or duhorn? or cp3?
fukn bust pick
Scoring from a wing player. I'm sick of watching Finley jack up blanks.
it... damon stoudemire could have given the Spurs that pg scoring if it was really that BIG of a need. He likes to chuck it.
Great pick! The playoffs showed us that what the team needed more than anything was a short, slow point guard and that's what the spurs are getting in this pick.
I'm glad they didn't pick up a young wing because we really don't need one of those.
He has good solid numbers in different aspects of the game, and there must have been something also in his at ude that RC and Pop feel that may compliment the team as a whole.
, New York Knicks have a lot of talent in their roster, and so does Denver, yet they seem to fail in so many ways. So let's give the front office a little benefit of the doubt in their choice.
He'll start 2 games into the season.
Id rather see the Hill on the court instead of the garbage truck Vaughn. You cant get worse than JV. THE SPURS FRONT OFFICE IS OVERATED.
He's a short Alfre Hughes.
Great pick! The playoffs showed us that what the team needed more than anything was a short, slow point guard and that's what the spurs are getting in this pick.
I'm glad they didn't pick up a young wing because we really don't need one of those.
It's not a bad pick but I'm disappointed that the Spurs used the 26th on him. No telling who the Spurs pick at 45th now.
The playoffs also showed that they need a defensive point guard that can stop other PGs in the league. Wings are available in free agency and they may find a gem at 45.
lol at all these "internet GMs" that know better than the pros.
my question is why not draft an accomplished guy, who put up better numbers than the number one overall pick and won an NCAA record 38 games? Why not draft an athletic SG/SF that is a big and creative slasher? why not draft a guy who competed at a very high level? CHRIS DOUGLAS-ROBERTS!!! TRADE UP NOW!!!! CHRIS DOUGLAS ROBERTS!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes. Because George Hill will stop CP3.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
