Is it worth shooting someone for stuff? Most people would have a hard time killing a person, but obviously Mr. Horn isn't one of them....
Yeah, I've seen that thread, but now that we've had time to digest this story, I want rational thoughts not hot-headed reactionaries from some of 'the element' that hides in the club...
....and I haven't seen one person in that thread mention the case of John White...
John White gets jail time while Horn walks....is there a double standard in America?
Dan wants his own thread. How cute.
Yeah, about normal for Dan. He has that "pick me",
"pick me" syndrome. He reminds of an immature brat.
Dan a person has the right to shoot anyone messing with his or his neighbors property. The sooner some of the slugs learn this, the sooner they will realize that "crime" really doesn't pay when you are six feet under.
You just described yourself perfectly. Think before you make yourself look like an idiot.
Ah, you hurt my feelings. You are smooth and well spoken. Obama fan are you?
Common now, Horn put himself into a situation that he didn't have to put himself into while John White was put into a situation where he felt his families safety was threatened...big difference.....
The Hero and the killer....
If they are wearing a "Loose Change" t-shirt, then fire when ready.
Nbadan. Since you want to race bait, it's interesting how the Joe Horn case got so much press, but the murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom did not.
Here's the snopes article in case you think it's a hoax.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/newsom.asp
The Snoopes article you posted does a good enough job proving you wrong...
...and is this a racial issue or a illegal immigration issue....watching wing-nut news I'm having trouble determining which is was....
Race issue? I don't think so. He observed them climbing out of his neighbor's window. I don't think he ask them if they were in the country legally or not, do you.
Or, are you saying they looked Hispanic so they were fair game as far as he was concerned. But really it doesn't make much difference. Case was presented to a Grand Jury, of which we have idea it's makeup, and they no billed him. Enough said.
Your opinion is just that, your opinion.
He shot them running away. most civil people will acknowledge that you shouldn't shoot someone in the back while most conservatives think it's cool..
So he shot them to prove a point? he wasn't in danger nor were the guys carrying anything (meaning the owners would not have lost any property) so he shoots them.. He'll get his mark my words..
The dude got carried away. I can see both sides. I'm all for fighting crime but his life was not in any danger.
This happened Nov of last year.
I guess Nbadan has no more 911 conspiracy drivel to talk about.
WTF does that have to do with anything?![]()
Neither.
It's an issue of two wads robbing a house and getting killed for doing so.
No it didn't.
Had Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom been black and their torturers/rapists/murderers been white, that story would have made national headlines.
And their only crime was going out to dinner together. They weren't in the middle of burglarizing a home.
P.S. Nbadan. If you put "[youtube]" tags around a quote, it won't show up.
Really? So a black man has never been murdered by a white man without it making national headlines?Had Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom been black and their torturers/rapists/murderers been white, that story would have made national headlines.
I didn't say that.
I merely pointed out that a case where a white homeowner shot and killed two illegal Columbians who were burglarizing a neighbors house made national headlines, while a case were a white couple was carjacked by 4 black men, who later shot the male 3 times, wrapped him in sheets, and set his body on fire and gang raped the girl (in every way imaginable) and then cleaned her mouth out with bleach and left her to die slowly in a trash can, did not make national headlines.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)