Reply With Quote
matt booner is not overpaid
he is making a little over the min
he can bring donuts to the team he can do something good
Matt Bonner is making $2,978,000, he's not worth one penny of it. He should be traded as soon as possible. He can't do anything good.
matt booner is not overpaid
he is making a little over the min
he can bring donuts to the team he can do something good
3 million for the 12th or 13th man is not ideal.
It's not that bad and is not preventing us from signing anyone.
Hate to preach to the choir but it prevented us from signing Luis Scola.
Uhm, no - Scolas contract and unwillingness to help pay for his buyout is what prevented it.
no it did not
spurs would not have signed scola if they let booner walk
The prevention aspect is irrelavant, either one is overpaid or they are not. The fact that one has to semi cope with saying it isn't that bad should raise some concern. Nobody is perfect, but his salary is a bit unreasonable. With that being said, alot of contracts are unreasonable but that still doesn't change the facts.
spurs thought splitter would fit better next to duncan then scola
spurs were right
however splitter screwed the spurs
scola screwed the spurs more because he thought he was god and caused problems with the spurs front office
selfish asshole
in todays game it is not that bad
if he can get to 7-8 man then he is underpaid
12/17 was it?
The night of Bonner pwnage. Never forget.
Uhm, I believe Scola's contract is identical to that of Bonners. Spurs reached an agreement with Bonner the first couple of days in free agency, which was a mistake because of how watered-down free agency was last year. If spurs had waited it out they could have signed Bonner for much less. With reaching an agreement with Bonner so early, anyone else that would be signed would put us over the luxury tax. Therefore we signed Bonner instead of Scola.
scola thread!
NO the spurs did not
spurs wanted splitter over scola
spurs were going to sign splitter over scola
booner had nothing to do with that
Signing Bonner to a 3 year deal for the exact amount of money Scola wanted makes it obvious they wanted Bonner more than Scola. Signing Splitter or not.
Too bad they signed Butler the year before....
....and Udoka after....
"If"s are different than what is. All I see is where he's at now. Also, his perceived potential in my view isn't that slot on this team. Maybe around that number on a different rotation, just not on this team. To be honest, it may be a sad day in Spur basketball if he's seventh in the rotation.
The ginger is overpaid, Scola> Bonner end of story.
You are en led to your opinion, as well as your inaccurate view of events.
scola would not see that many minutes with the spurs since he plays the same spot as duncan
scola stats would be alot lower on the spurs then houston
and scola could not handle pop
scola got ticked rc told him to work on his rebounding
scola is a baby
Scola would have been fine as a Spur.
But so what?
I understand Scola was used to get Butler's contract off the books. But I dont understand how we resigned Bonner for 9-10 million over 3 years and how we couldn't figure out a way to bring Scola in silver and black when he asked for Bonner money.
because your iq is 10
maybe it was not the money
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
