Your "position" is that you consider the Blazers a doughnut team until Oden plays a game. You said as much. I was responding to the following statement by you...
Get it?
They are who we thought they are.
Your "position" is that you consider the Blazers a doughnut team until Oden plays a game. You said as much. I was responding to the following statement by you...
Get it?
Dream on.
I said it wasn't about my position.
I also started a new paragraph and wrote, "At any rate." Meaning it was another point, an additional point, a different point. I mentioned my other point because when I listed the Bulls roster, you didn't respond or even acknowledge that the Bulls' roster had "comparable" talent based on where their players were drafted. The Bulls' roster does have comparable talent to Portland's roster. That's my point.
That makes your thread wrong.
Get it?
i see your incomparable blazers talent and raise you the Spurs incomparable championship talent.....SCOREBOARD
No it doesn't. The average draft position of the Blazers' lottery players is 6.1. The average draft position of the Bulls' lottery players is 7.1. Besides that, anyone can see that their talent is not comparable.
Top 9 players for Blazers. Top 10 players for Bulls.
Take the top 10 players for Bulls to make it fair. That makes the average position for the Bulls' top 9 players is 6.2.
Comparable.
And, if it wasn't about draft position and you can just see that the Bulls' roster isn't comparable, why is the first post about when the Blazers players were selected in their drafts?
Okay JamStone, I'll accept that you believe the Bulls' talent is comparable to the Blazers'.
It's not about my belief. What don't you get?
Your thread was about how the Blazers had "incomparable talent" and used their draft positions as your point in proving it. I provide a roster that has "comparable" draft positions with the players on their roster and you make it about my position or my belief.
It's using your logic to disprove your contention.
Get it?
Nope. It's okay though, I still like your posts.
I cannot comprehend a team with so much young talent. I am Spur fan.
Duncan #1
Parker #28
Ginobili #57
3 les together, which is more than Portland can ever hope to accomplish with that crew.
that's a good team
Michael Olowakandi #1
Kwame Brown #1
Pervis Ellison #1
Mychael Thompson #1 (by portland)
Darko Millicic #2
Keith Van Horn #2
Shawn Bradley #2
Rafael Arajeo #8
Nikoloz Tskitshvil #5
So many lottery picks, wow, awesome.
Who will they select with the 2009, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 lottery picks?
Oh, the thrill of waiting draft day to arrive, only one night at the year, but what a night!
The current Blazers sqaud will never be as good as that 2000 team.
This message brought to you by Metamucil...the official soft drink of the San Antonio Spurs.
GO SPURS GO.....but in case you do, make sure you are wearing your Depends.
The current Blazers team will be better. Our first order of business will be to knock the Lakers off the top spot in the West.![]()
How you can come back to this thread after the whooping that JamStone laid on you is beyond me!
o u watched back then??I thought u started watching the NBA this season.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)