Reply With Quote
You have forgotten Splitter.
first we losing to the Lakers in a disappoint series after we blow a 24 point lead, a 17 point lead and we lost a game that decided by the refs. we also got hurt by Manu injury.
than we get screwed in the draft by Portland and Houston and end up with unknown player.
than we loosing Corey Maggette after we all thought that we have him.
and than we end up with Roger Mason as our biggest offseason addition.
this season was a nightmare!!!
You have forgotten Splitter.
1. Lakers were better than the Spurs.
2. The Spurs got the player they targeted in the draft.
3. If you thought that Corey Maggette was a lock to the Spurs, you weren't paying attention.
4. The Spurs wanted Roger Mason last offseason too.. and offered him a contract. So apparently they see something in the guy.
5. Spurs fans are spoiled.
i thought i forgot somethingYou have forgotten Splitter.
The offseason is still a work in progress. I'll wait until after the Spurs finish and after the summer leagues to give it a thumbs up or thumbs down.
Let's not write this one in stone yet, shall we?
Chicken Little thread.
This is the most disappointment thread I've read today.
Kori is right--we got the guy we wanted in the draft.
Pop told Hill that if he was still available when they got around to the Spurs, he was the pick.
That is clear, unequivocal, umambiguous.
The other fellow was told he could fit well in the rotation, etc, which he probably would.
This was equivocal, ambiguous and muddled.
The rest is history.
How bout Scola? whoops
As long as we have our big 3.. we'll compete again.
i just getting out my frustration from this season
as a dear friend once said........"it aint over till the fat lady sings"
Yea this thread is going down the hole.
i cannot agree that these 2008 Lakers are better than these Spurs.
no way
Maybe I'm still in denial. But I still think the Spurs were a better team. I think they lost because they were so mentally and physically drained from the previous two series. It was kind of the reverse of the Suns series. The Suns were just as good as the Spurs, but the first game just set them back mentally and could never recover from it.
We lost because we just played bad in that series. In the Suns series, we played the best we can ever play. Parker and Manu never had good games consistently afterwards. In the Hornets series, we just barely got by from our playoff experience. If we would of lost to the Hornets, I would have been happier because the Hornets just match up perfectly against the Spurs.
Either way, winning the series against the Lakers doesn't mean the Spurs could have beaten the Celtics, which I think are a lot better than the Lakers.
Side Notes: Pop was especially chippy and happy before and in Game 1 in the Lakers series. Could it mean he was confident against the Lakers?
I don't recall the Spurs winning the series.
WE HAVE IAN GETTING TONS OF MINUTES NEXT SEASON!! Ian = future allstar.
grow some balls...
I say very even matchup if manu had played like Manu.
haha...if manu had been healthy.
i promise you this series wouldve been 5-6 games in the spurs favor....
thats what everyone said before the series started.
i cant believe kori said that the Lakers are better than the spurs. and its not sour grapes either. its just misfortune for the spurs. if Manu had been Manu, we wouldve definetetly won Game 1 and wrapped it up in 5 or 6.
how is roger mason a bad sign. This guy can shoot 3s really well.
Those are what's and if's. They lost the series no matter what the excuse. They weren't better, simple as that.
Have you met wisnub?
Lakers were without Bynum..a guy who could give them 14 and 10 with a few blocks. stop acting like lakers were healthly. they weren't
Scola and Splitter are the great disappointments. One was boneheadedness by the team, the other was more out of their control.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
