damn... that's a good one... i've been saying this all along.
you're a good publicist. nevertheless, if george hill and mahimi are flops, will you think the same? What will be the excuse then?
damn... that's a good one... i've been saying this all along.
Manu not being healthy cost them a chance to be in the Finals.
And us having a SG rotation of 36 year old Brent Barry, 35 year old Michael Finley, and Manu (whom can only play limited minutes) is what hosed us when Manu went down.
Whose job is it to give us some serviceable depth?
how does a player, who in your words sucks, cost the spurs a le?
Parker could go 2-100 with 400 turnovers to play the Spurs out of a playoff series and ducks would still blame it on Manu.
what other front office is doing a better job
gasol was handed to the lakers last year
boston did a good offseason last year
after 15 years old terrible ball
lakers were not great tell they got gasol
hornets put together a team
but it is not proven they can stay healthy
So now you've gone to the 'other teams have sucky front offices so it's okay if ours sucks too' argument.
Awesome.
the big three needed to score 70 again
manu 7 did not get it done
never said he sucked
he just sucks playing more then 30 minutes a game
but gets paid like he plays 40 minutes a game
Incorrect. The Spurs couldn't deal Bonner's rights to move Butler's contract and avoid the lux tax. Further, had they indeed let Bonner walk and signed Scola, then they would have faced the very lux tax liability they sought to eliminate with the actual trade.
Don't be stupid.Good to see your back to being your condescending self as usual...
trying to find out if nba front office is doing a good job to you
or the internet gm (you ) that has 20-20 vision after the fact is always better then any one getting paid to scout the talent and pick the players they think will work for spurs
please explain how bonner and scola's contracts are the same? Are you saying they were only concerned with getting rid of the remaining year on Butler's deal? Couldn't that contract have been mitigated with no signing verious scrubs? Also, why the did RC sign Butler in the first place? Does he not bear responsibility for that dumbass move?
Ifs and buts. What's the excuse for you whining about dumb on here?
the year before they won a le
did you think they were to old then
QUESTION
hindsight is how we know if anyone has done a good job dumb dumb.
don't be a punk.
i thought players got paid by peformance and not by minutes played?
Am I saying that RC has to please a finicky coach and an owner who's unwilling to pay the luxury tax? Yes.
Don't be stupid.
internet toughguy. don't want to answer questions then fine, but you're acting like a puss tonight.
Hey genius, go back 2-3 summers ago, we were talking about the need to get younger on the perimeter then too. It's been the same three years running now, and all we got was RC and Pop saying that we won a le last year and there was no need to revamp the team.
Stupid.
OK, if that's the case why do we have garbage like Butler pushing that threshold?
Great, so we've had a couple of years pass, the old guys get a couple of years older, and they got exposed on the perimeter this past season.
So basically the same we've been saying was going to happen for three years now has happened twice in three years. How many years are we supposed to wait on the front office to get a clue?
If we dump Finley I will give him a little bit of a break, but I have a bad feeling that waste of space will be back.
I guess spurs front office knew more then you knew when they won it all with the old guys huh
And you're acting stupid tonight, internet 20/20 hindsight GM.
I guess you think they can count on scrub teams like Golden State to upset the teams built to beat them like Dallas every year huh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)