Conveniently sidestepping the presented evidence about George's FG% numbers.![]()
Ah, those violent teams.
Conveniently sidestepping the presented evidence about George's FG% numbers.![]()
i'll take none of the above choices.
No not at all, my point is I wouldnt pick him as a scorer it would be as a special defender against certain teams larger face up players...Think he would be the better for that purpose....as a pure scorer Barnes is better no question. But hopefully we wont sign either
I would definitely like to get Barnes.....It would be nice if GS signed him to a 2 yr / $6 million deal and then traded him to SA for Bonner + a 2009 2nd.
George just plain sucks, Barnes isn't great but he is way better than him.
Spurs need a big SF who can also play some small ball PF. Gist could be that guy but as a rookie, who has been picked 57th, odds are slim that he could help a contender right away.
Barnes would be fine to fill that need and if Spurs can get him for $4M/2 years, they should sign him without a doubt.
George was last year. He started to look better after the Kidd trade, but I think that was just in contrast to the nosediving Mavs.
I believe George may have just signed with Cleveland.
I can't stand Devean George. Another pass.
I agree with you on the Barnes front. I would even be willing to do a 2 yr/6 mill if it meant we acquired Barnes while removing Bonner from our books.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)