Hmmm...Well, I Engage in alot of Philosophy to be honest. Why can't I watch a film if I feel like it?....Furthermore I never stated I believed it was planned. I said "IF".If you are going to spend four hours of your time on something, why not have that something be reading a website that teaches critical thinking skills?
I'd advocate the viewing of it.
I think multiple airplanes hit buildings and people died. Whether or not it was planned by the gov't isn't something I dwell on. There certainly are advantages for these events. That is what I dwell on. Legislation can be altered because of public morale and feelings. Sometimes in the middle of passion, reaction can be swift. The use of such events is what matters to me.
Last edited by Spur-Addict; 07-10-2008 at 02:39 PM. Reason: Grammar: Morale
Barry Jennings Uncut
I've been sitting on this interview for a while, but after viewing the latest BBC piece on WTC7, I feel the time has come to release it in its entirety.
After locating Barry in mid 2007, Jason and I visited him and he graciously granted us an interview during a lunch break. He had agreed to grant us an interview under the conditions that we, at no time, associate his interview with his place of employment.
Jason and I were so thrilled with the content of the interview that we decided to release a few bits and pieces of it on both our show and Alex's.
A few months later, as the film was nearing completion, I called Barry again to touch base and see how things were going. It took him a bit to remember who I was, but as soon as he did, he began complaining about phone calls to his place of employment and that he was in danger of losing his job. He requested to have his interview pulled from Loose Change, and I honored his request.
Fast forward to February, 2008, where I'm doing an interview with the BBC, and I'm informed by their crew that Barry told them the reason he asked for it to be pulled was because of the article on Prisonplanet claiming he was stepping over dead bodies, which he denies saying. I call Barry to attempt to rectify the situation, and he is adamant that he did not use the phrase "we were stepping over people"
Fast forward one more time to two days ago, when the BBC piece finally aired. I now feel an obligation to release his interview, in its entirety, into the public where it belongs for three reasons:
1) To see the difference between the interview he gave us, and the interview he gave the BBC.
2) To establish Barry's timeline in his own words.
3) To preserve his testimony, in his own words, for the historical record.
I have remained true to my word and kept his interview out of the film, however, I can no longer keep it from the public. They deserve to hear Barry's story, out of his own mouth.
As I say in the end of the video, I would appreciate it if Barry could enjoy his privacy and live his life in peace. My intention with releasing this is so his story can be told, not to cause him any further grief or suffering.
WATCH THE VIDEO:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16573
BBC Piece Post-Mortem: Mark Loizeaux and the Special Engineer
CDI
It is difficult for me to know where to begin peeling away the layers of misinformation the BBC peddled to their audience in last weeks exposé on the collapse of Building 7 of the World Trade Center in New York. There are so many people out there grinding away at the production, I don’t feel the need to repeat what they have already done with journeyman-like effectiveness, yet there is something that I have yet to see addressed that I feel is crucial to exposing the overall lack of trustworthiness of the piece. And there is another related aspect of it, that I feel may in fact, be almost an unintended admission, of sorts.
At issue? Mark Loizeaux’s direct misrepresentation of fact and Peter Hayden’s uncanny admission.
READ MORE:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16565
The Third Tower - A Critical Review
The Third Tower
A Critical Examination
On July 6, 2008, BBC released a do entary examining the collapse of World Trade Center 7, on September 11, 2001. The film purported to "solve the final mystery" of 9/11 in regards to whether the collapse of the building was due to fire or controlled demolition. The film used interviews of people from both sides of the argument, as well as stock footage and reconstructions to show the viewer the cases to be made for each theory. This is the second film the BBC has created on the subject of alternative theories of 9/11.
The film is highly charged and controversial, with emotions running deep. In this review I will attempt to remove the emotional side of the film and simply look at the facts and opinions offered, their validity, and the BBC's attempt to make a "balanced" film.
Act I
The film opens with a quick introduction that thrusts the viewer into the chaos of 9/11 - the plane impacts and subsequent destruction of the World Trade Center towers that we are all familiar with. But in a rare event, the BBC finally choose to now focus their attention on the little known collapse of World Trade Center 7, almost a decade after the fact. Up until this point in time, WTC7 has largely been ignored in the media - with very small clips here and there, but never telling the whole story. In fact in its previous film, the BBC discussed WTC7 as a small side event and dismissed the controlled demolition claim purely on the word of a Popular Mechanics researcher. Now the BBC has returned and vows to do justice to the subject.
READ MORE:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16564
BBC's Third Tower: 30 Pieces of Good News
BBC | do entary | Dylan Avery | galileo | Kevin Barrett | left gatekeeping | Media Coverage | Richard Gage | Rolf Lindgren | Steven Jones | wtc 7
BBC's Third Tower: 30 Pieces of Good News
by Dr. Kevin Barrett and Rolf Lindgren
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/c...,7076949.story
The one-hour BBC program The Third Tower should have a positive effect on spreading the truth about what happened to WTC 7. Despite its attempt to debunk by twisting and omitting facts, there is much to cheer about.
Here are 30 examples from the program:
1) There is a WTC 7, many have never heard of it.
2) No plane hit WTC 7.
3) WTC 7 fell down.
4) Several videos of WTC 7 falling down are shown.
5) The collapse is compared visually to a controlled demolition.
6) Barry Jennings tells of hearing multiple explosions in WTC 7.
7) Barry Jennings was told while in WTC 7 "Get out of there, get out of there now", which sounds very su ious.
8) Barry Jennings' time-line is not contradicted by anything Barry Jennings says.
9) After seven years, no final report on the collapse of WTC 7 has appeared.
10) The program will generate sales and Internet hits of 'Loose Change'.
11) The program will help raise the profile of Dylan Avery, Richard Gage, and Steven Jones.
READ MORE:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16570
That's all they care about.10) The program will generate sales and Internet hits of 'Loose Change'.
11) The program will help raise the profile of Dylan Avery, Richard Gage, and Steven Jones.
Everyone on the scene thought it would collapse.
That's all I care about.
Chump is like those girls on the Maury show that have 6 black men DNA tested and not one of them is the father he just refuses to give up.
What's incredible is that Chumpy still subscribes to the Church of the Bush administration for the basis his 9/11 faith movement...
Mouse and Dan, what do you think really happened on 9/11?
Chump knows how to put on a show!
"I'm just asking questions."
*fixed
You ask the same question over and over. it does not matter if Osama bin laden himself had an autograph picture of Bush next to a truck full of Gold you would say it was photo shopped.
If you was in NY on 9/11 and a hot smoky passport feel from the sky you would say it was fake that someone tossed it out of a building to look like someone else was flying the plane.
But yet you look at some grainy black and white film of some men in space suits walking around on a Hollywood studio set and you claim men went to thew moon back in 1969.
Your're some piece of work my friend.
And you never answer it.You ask the same question over and over.
What do you think really happened on 9/11?
People died for no reason. next question......................
Why do you say that?
Because they didn't die until Bush took office. Just think if Bush's dad had a rubber on that night 2974 people would be alive today.
Why do you think Bush is responsible?
Your right it was Cheney.
I think there was a abundance of intelligence that was out there before 9/11 which should have made the attacks preventable - so, not buying into the administration rhetoric that 'no one could have predicted that terra-ists flying planes into buildings', even though Cheney was preparing for that very scenario on 9/11, your left with two choices - either the Bush administration was negligent in its duty to protect the American people or it played a role in hastening the 9/11attacks...
Why do you think Cheney is responsible?
Stunning inaccuracies aside, what do you think really happened on 9/11?
When your child gets caught smoking weed you blame the parents. Are you saying and Bush are not in charge of America?
Funny how when Clinton was prez he got all the blame, now that Bush is prez, it's someone else's fault?
I can only imagine in about 5 years from now when Chump matures to an adult how he and his Bush loving friends will feel when they look back to some of the moronic replies they posted.
I can't believe the guys from Popular Mechanics took the time to debate these ass clowns.
There are two sides to 9/11 The truth or The Chump
You're right. The truth is, the government has been breeding aliens at Wright Patterson Air Force base since 1947 (you know, the ones that crashed in Roswell?). Anyway, the aliens were able to remote pilot the planes using mental telepathy. The entire goal was to bring down WTC7. The other planes were just decoys.
So why didn't president Clinton act on it?
Funny how so many times in the past, I head the Clinton administration briefed the Bush adminoistration on possible attacks. It must have not been important to president Clinton to take care of it. If not important to him, why should president Bush have wasted his time on something president Clinton ignored?
You guys have to take a position and stop flip-flopping as it suits you for Bush Bashing needs.
It's funny because you can answer chumpdumper and he will still be unsatisfied until you present him with a do ent as big as the 9/11 commission report. Thats why noone even bothers to try these days because when we threw our opinions out there, you refused to acknowledge them in typical Chumpdumping fashion.
Loose Change guys rule, I wish I could get rich off dumbasses.
I think the 3rd tower has explosives in it, and did not fall because of the Twin Towers at all.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
