He's not as volatile as Artest, but he's not as talented either. But what I'm saying is there's a certain point talentwise when the at ude problem seems to begin to be forgiven. If a guy with a bad at ude averages 4 pts in 20 minutes as a 6th man and is suggested as an addition, almost everybody says "no" or " no!" or "no in' way!" but if a guy with a bad at ude averages 10 pts per 20 minutes, some of those same people say things like "Pop could keep him in line," or "Timmy would be a good influence on him," etc... Do spurs fans really take pride in having a high character team first and foremost, or is it something they'd willingly compromise on? Hill and Mason seem like such high character guys, so it seems to me that those issues still loom large for Pop and RC.