Whott is an anthropological biologist.
I'm an anthropologist.
You got any links to editorials by the animals? Thanks...in advance.
Monogamy may cause extinction:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0527084621.htm
You need to work on the biology to back up your points.
Already posted them.
Read them.
Thanks.
So the animals can write?
That's amazing.
2Blonde wants me to head up her fan club but she feels sorry for Paki's heart condition and pee wee being re ed.
Like I said...animals don't create PC's or use complex verbal communication...so turn off the PC, shut up and start grunting...and go live in the woods.
If these things are not natural and it is against our nature to use them, then stop using them.
And you need to stop looking at animals as something to aspire to being...
Turn off the PC...stop writing. Animals don't use PC's or type...so shut up and stop doing it.
Dude, are you ever going to lunch?
So might stupidity.
Like I said...marriage is a survival mechanism depending on the environment and ratio of males to females, among other things. So is polygamy, bigamy and most other forms of bonding.
I'm not saying you have to be married...I myself am divorced, but when I was married I had zero desire to pursue other women or other sexual relationships would have been content to stay that way for the rest of my life.
I have never had the uncontrollable desire to go and or come on to every hot girl I see. Yeah I appreciate a good looking woman and am as prone to looking as much as the next guy, but I would have been content to spend the rest of my life with the right woman in a totally monogamous relationship.
And I am saying that it serves a survival purpose(as evidenced the rampant spread of those that espouse it as a creed to live by), and it is very much up to the individual.
Huge generalization on your part saying that it's not in man's nature to be monogamous and marry...it may not be in the nature of all men(or women) but it is most definitely in the nature of some.......
That last part is not generalizing?
Hey Pee...I've seen dogs that will eat the of other dogs.
You first.....
I don't suppose while you are googling arguments to use against me you'd be so kind as to google the engandered species list and tell me how many monogamous creatures are on it...
Thanks, in advance.
The sciencedaily wasn't enough for you?
But, anyway, calling someone out for making generalizing statements and then making one yourself is just genius.
When we meet I'm going to say hi to you and then I'm going to bend over and you can stick your nose up the crack of my ass and take a big ole sniff instead of saying hi...after all, animals do that too.
Marriage is a natural thing for man.
Man is not part of the animal kingdom.
Such is the wisdom of the anthropologist whott.
I didn't see anything conclusive, in fact the article I read made a point of saying the information isn't conclusive and they really don't know .
But, anyway, calling someone out for making generalizing statements and then making one yourself is just genius.
How did I generalize...it's in my nature to be monogamous, and it has been since before I had any concept of religious right or wrong. that's proof that it is in the nature of some.
No and No.
Survival is a natural thing for man, in fact we do it better and with more versatility than any other mammals....and marriage is a survival construct, a product of the adaptive ability of man and at a times a necessity due to the unique biology, and growth period of man, not to mention the numerous environments we are capable of surviving in.
Man is not part of the animal kingdom.
Such is the wisdom of the anthropologist whott.
Hmmm...
Even a dumbass probably easily knows that our closest relatives are the Chimpanzee and they are not monogamous, they practice infanticide and all sorts of other that is generally looked down upon by thriving aspects of humanity...
How's it working out for them?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)