The chances of Manu remaining healthy are slim to none. It's time to move on. We knew with his style of play that his career would be shortened. Here is a trade that I would propose. We would be able to replace his scoring and add young low post talent.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...24~24&te=&cash=
manu was not traded
you change the le to what do you you think about thsi trade proposal!
you want to be banned
just ask kori she can fix it for you
I'm certainly glad you're not making FO decisions for the spurs.
Manu is arguably your clutchest player, why the would you want to do that?
only in 3rd world countries do people ban speech.
he is when he's healthy. He has been breaking down lately, even when the spurs won their 4th.
and now you're showing your real xenophobic face... classy from you... then y'all complain about where your country is going... with this kinda thoughts... u r not generating great karma that you could say... here at the third world yes i am... wish i was there though... to replace the many people like you that don;t have the minimal idea what you actually have
Still a Manu at 50 percent is better than those scrubs.
what we actually have is freedom of speech. Though this is a meaningless thread, I did want to point out to you.
50% manu gets us waxed in the playoffs.
1. Everyone (not just the Spurs) know Manu won't stay healthy anymore, so while he's still a fantastic player, I bet teams are not as willing to part with nearly as much in order to acquire Manu unless they are trying to win it all next year or the following year... I don't believe the Knicks are at that point.
2. Talent-wise, it's a decent deal for both sides. But, once you take into consideration where each team is at in terms of contending and rebuilding, it doesn't make much sense for either. Manu is the best player in the deal, but his age and durability concerns make the deal questionable at best for a team that is rebuilding nearly from scratch.
3. The deal would be a little more tempting to the Knicks if you exchange Vaughn with Ian Mahinmi.
4. Isiah Thomas doesn't make roster moves for the Knicks anymore.
great ways of doing it... calling out international users from smaller countries makes you a heck a guy! congrats to your mother and father for the great values and education they gave you!
Tim wants Manu to stay.
manu+ filler for barbosa+ diaw
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...4~24&te=&cash=
Manu in D'Antoni's system would be phenomenaul and would keep the natives happy.
you want to be treated equally, but then act like a victim. Listen dude, you started with the ban response. I tried to educate you and now you're pissed. Accept the lesson.
I'm all for trading Manu but not for David Lee and Jamal Crawford.
where is your loyalty to someone that gave us two rings?
tssss
and Manu wasn't traded as your le suggests.
No and NO.
He helped us with 3 rings actually...I still would not be against trading him for the right deal.where is your loyalty to someone that gave us two rings?
tssss
and Manu wasn't traded as your le suggests.
D'Antoni has no system for the Knicks yet.
And Manu would do nothing for Knicks fans if they continue to lose. Adding just Manu to that roster does not make them that much better.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
