Just for the record I voted for Rodman
Ron Artest
Dennis Rodman
Latrell Spreewell
Stephen Jackson
Forgetting someone?
![]()
Just for the record I voted for Rodman
There is only one correct answer and that is Dennis Rodman. And it isn't close.
congratulations. you still fellated artest.
Artest just hit his prime. It leaves more room for improvement, or the opposite.
Rodman brings lots of excitement. But I'll pick Stephen Jackson. He seems to be "less evil" than the others.
he's also the only one who's played next to Jordan AND Duncan
Stephen Jackson was swinging lights out in that brawl plus he drew his side arm and fired the weapon at a strip bar. I think he might be the evilest of them all.
Were they on a USA team together?
For me it's a toss up between Spree and Jax.
Yes, Artest is excellent on both ends of the court, but he is the most unstable player of the list; even moreso than Rodman.
Spree and Jax can miss 15 shots throughout the first 3 Q, then out of nowhere, explode in the 4th.
Last edited by lefty; 08-05-2008 at 01:40 PM.
Sorry. In my book, those who abuse women (Artest got arrested for it, Spree was accused of it, Rodman got booked for felony domestic violence) are just a bit worse.
good point
He's got a ring and he bent your team over twice.
So does Michael Doleac and Tyronn Lue
Is that supposed to make me change my answer? You guys get to call Dirk a soft pussy choker, I get to cop a snide and dismissive at ude towards the Spurs.and he bent your team over twice.
The Spurs have four les, but they've never been loved. Accept and deal with it. This is the LAST place on the net I'm going to slurp Spurs .
Rodman's rings were as a role player too, and he quit on three teams. How does that make him a winner.
He was a great player, Jax is a very good player. It's a fuzzy line, not a hard and fast one in my book, but Rodman was great at what he did. Jackson has never in my mind been great. There's only a tiny handful of power forwards the Bulls could've plugged in there and still won three les with. The Spurs on the other hand could've plugged 20-25 guys into the starting SF spot and still won the le in 2003.
I don't see how that makes Rodman a winner and Jack not.
Truth be told, I don't really think of any of them as true winners, because they've all played for multiple teams and their act wore thin at some point. I guess I just have the most respect for Rodman because he did it in Chicago for 3 years, bought into the team concept and behaved himself...mostly.
Jax did it for one year in San Antonio and then got greedy and rejected a reasonable offer from the Spurs because he wanted to put up numbers elsewhere.
Something nobody has mentioned:
Rodman is probably the only player that wasn't a true headcase in his prime, depending on what you consider his prime.
He certainly wasn't a headcase his entire career, he was putting up some very nice numbers when the Pistons won back to back Championships.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)