Reply With Quote
good point!
and JR Smith says he would like to sign with the spurs.....haha denver will sign JR for sure.
Denver is also interested in him. They can afford Pargo more than they can afford J.R. Smith. Hmmm....
good point!
and JR Smith says he would like to sign with the spurs.....haha denver will sign JR for sure.
He would be a good pick up, a guy who can play the 1 and 2, solid defender and can shoot the 3. He can score points very quickly and we need that off the bench. Would even allow Pops to maybe give tony a game off every now and then to keep him fresh for the playoffs.
I hope this happens he is only 28 and comming into his prime. A hard worker and a team guy. He has shown some tuffness to!
Cool.
+ He has some balls, and will take big shots. Which is cool. He has a little SJax in him.
+ Plays tough D.
+ Doesn't have a big ego.
He should fit right in. I like it.
*ding ding ding*
And that is precisely why all this pargo talk makes me ing sick to my stomach.
Not only is the possibility of us nabbing Pargo below 50%, but no matter what happens, its already a given fact that Hill was a mistake. Jesus ty F'n Bajeezus, this draft situation extends for the 5th straight year. Like I said earlier in this thread, yet another notch in what is easily the worst offseason in the Tim Duncan Era.
Best way to get better after getting rid of your old guys
I'm just curious if Mahinmi turns out to be good won't that put a damper in your arguement sunshine? George hill hasn't played minute one and u duck nuts have already written him off. Great take there skippy.
This does look more likely than the Maggette signing but in no way would I be surprised if Pargo signs somewhere else.
So what happens if we don't sign him? Does the FO play Hill as the backup? As if his confidence was shaken enough from the scorching drought of Las Vegas. He plays good defense and can't score - I would think he would fit right in with the rest of the team. Joking...
Also, I'm very curious about how these things drag out. I can only hope that the hang up to signing Pargo right now is not that Pargo is going to get more money from someone else but that the Spurs are trying to make sure they can dump Bonner and Vaughn on someone else before they get Pargo to sign. However, these things all happening at the same time is probably too much to hope for from the FO. Based on past results, they have little tendency to do more than one thing at once.
Everyone keeps assuming that we are even interested in Pargo. It's all just rumor at this point. Pargo's agent may just be playing a game to drum up excitement for his product.
At this point, until will sign Pargo, we best assume that George Hill is our man!
The point I was trying to make was that if we do indeed sign Pargo, that is a great value signing which is why I think the Spurs would be interested. If they do not either cut or trade Vaughn or Hill then it will create a log jam that will make things hard to fill the two other needs this team has: a scoring 3 and another backup 4/5. If Pargo is signed that would give the Spurs 13 roster spots filled with Hill unsigned. You would assume they would sign Hill if he is not involved in a trade. That would give us 14 spots. Which is what I meant about the money used to sign Pargo would effect the other spots because instead of using the 2 exceptions to fill the 3/4/5 needs and just rolling with Parker/Hill/Vaughn we would only have 1 roster spot and exception to use to fill what I think is two holes on the roster.
I think they are just trying to get the best value for their money at this point if this is true. It is not a lack of confidence in Hill, imo.
I would rather have the Spanoulis rumor be true and get him, but that sounds like complete b.s.
Pop always likes four point guards duck nuts great take, oh yeah, skippy.
He did last season.
I'd like to see Hill play in Austin and Vaughn play somewhere else. Mason can always run the point for a few minutes if we really need it.
Vaughn isn't going anywhere haters, so just chill out and suck it up.
I hate Bonner, not Vaughn. Vaughn won't get any meaningful minutes whether we sign Pargo or not, so no big deal.
Vaughn isn't going anywhere haters, so just chill out and suck it up.
Vaughn is already a wasted roster spot. If there are 4 point guards and Hill is the last option, then that is sad. Can we get Vaughn a tractor dealership and let him retire, and if things are so bad by April, then resign him to the playoff roster?
If Hill is on the Toros next year, then the only championship we're going to win is in the developmental league. I'm not saying Hill has earned any PT yet, but burying him behind Vaughn seems wrong. If Hill has to learn to be a pro by playing in the Toros, yes, it could pay off down the road but down the road, for a team this old, is driving off the cliff.
But Pargo could come right in and get good minutes, which would allow Hill to develop and learn the system without detrimental growing pains to next year's Spurs. If we don't get Pargo, then I'm all for the growing pains.
Pargo Close to a Deal with San Antonio?
Posted: 8/5/2008 3:35:00 AM
Source: San Antonio Express-News
The last time the Spurs saw Jannero Pargo, he was jacking up jump shots for New Orleans in the waning moments of Game 7 of last season's Western Conference semifinals. There is a chance the next jumper Pargo hoists could come in a Spurs uniform.
The rumor in one Western Conference front office Monday afternoon had it that Pargo was about to agree to -- or perhaps already had agreed to -- a deal that would have brought the backup point guard to San Antonio.
Ah, but not so fast.
Pargo's agent, Mark Bartelstein, acknowledged ongoing talks with the Spurs, but said his client has yet to agree to a deal with anyone.
"The Spurs speak for themselves," Bartelstein said Monday. "It's a great place to play. They are limited in what they can do financially, but we are definitely talking to them."
The Spurs spent the lion's share of their mid-level exception to sign former Washington guard Roger Mason Jr. -- another Bartelstein client -- earlier this summer. The team still has a $2.9 million biannual exception at its disposal, more than double the $1.08 million Pargo would have earned next season in New Orleans had he not opted out of his contract.
Yeah they are sooooooooo ancient.
So do you think Vaughn can contribute anything meaningful to a 2009 championship? I sure as don't!!!!!!!!!!!Yeah they are sooooooooo ancient.
No more trades to get rid of someone. If the Spurs can get someone back they need then that is OK to make a trade. The last time we did this was a gigantic up Butler and Scola just to get rid of Butler was stupid looking at it now.
I'm fine with signing Pargo. Little short for a SG though. This can only mean Hill is going to Austin or Vaughn is being moved (I know this has probably been said a hundred times in this thread).
Well then we can be thankful that you're not in the front office
Our definitions of "meaningful" obviously differ.
Add more exclamation points.
THEN IT MAKES MORE SENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jacque Vaughn as the third or 4th point guard is fine and nothing wrong.
I don't know where you guys have come from, but go back.
I have an idea where you have come from, but I don't want to be positive.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
