Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011
Results 251 to 260 of 260
  1. #251
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    The cost of their oil is in essence parts, labor, etc. It does not cost them $120 per bbl to get their oil. It is no more than maybe $30 per bbl. My argument is that Mexico keeps their oil within their own market circle, shielding it from world supply and demand pricing.
    If they did this, they'd have a shortage of refined products. Great idea!

    I know Scott is knowledgeable in this filed, but in this case, I'm rather certain he's on the wrong side of the truth.
    Yeah, okay.

  2. #252
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Scott, you are arguing everything around my point. Not my point, so forget you.

  3. #253
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Scott, you are arguing everything around my point. Not my point, so forget you.
    yeah okay

  4. #254
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    I know Scott is knowledgeable in this filed, but in this case, I'm rather certain he's on the wrong side of the truth.
    I know Wild Cobra is knowledgeable in chemistry, but when it comes to chemistry, I'm rather certain his on the wrong side of the truth.



    ... and I'm supposed to believe YOU when you start talking out your ass about global warming, even though you don't really study global climate for a living?

    I can't logically dismiss what you say about global warming based on the fact that you are a hack, but you keeping saying the stupidist, most partisan , making me assign anything you say about global warming very little weight when it comes to evaluating the evidence.

  5. #255
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Scott, you are arguing everything around my point. Not my point, so forget you.

    Translation:

    "I know I just got caught talking out my ass by someone smarter than I am, I will pretend it doesn't matter so I don't have to admit I was wrong."

  6. #256
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Historic numbers are on my side.
    Do tell, hack-boy. Step up and let me see them and how they support your argument.

  7. #257
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    That is the standard WC response when you pick his strawmen apart.

    "you aren't really addressing my points", in a lame-ass attempt to avoid admitting how shaky his point was.

  8. #258
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    You guys forget that PEMEX is state run and operated, treaded as a state resource. Not like a corportation. This is Corporatism. On the books, all their profit, and then some is effectively taxed. It is treaded as a vessel for state debt as well. Since it is taxed at something like 60% on the books, and a state en y, it is not truely a subsidy that anyone sees at the pumps. It is effectively a tax break.

    They have plenty of oil to sell for profit on the open market and still produce fuel at a profit. They export (2008 estimates & various site links) 59.94% of their oil produced and import 14.85% of what they consume. Selling at market value and producing at say $30 per bbl gived them plenty of room to still sell gasoline at a profit.

    Please use the real meaning of subsidy. Not the liberal translations of it.

  9. #259
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    You guys forget that PEMEX is state run and operated, treaded as a state resource. Not like a corportation. This is Corporatism. On the books, all their profit, and then some is effectively taxed. It is treaded as a vessel for state debt as well. Since it is taxed at something like 60% on the books, and a state en y, it is not truely a subsidy that anyone sees at the pumps. It is effectively a tax break.

    They have plenty of oil to sell for profit on the open market and still produce fuel at a profit. They export (2008 estimates & various site links) 59.94% of their oil produced and import 14.85% of what they consume. Selling at market value and producing at say $30 per bbl gived them plenty of room to still sell gasoline at a profit.

    Please use the real meaning of subsidy. Not the liberal translations of it.
    Please give me the "historical figures" that back up your assertion.

  10. #260
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Please use the real meaning of subsidy. Not the liberal translations of it.



    "liberal translations"

    It isn't a translation, dipwad, it is the definition of a subsidy.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •