Reply With Quote
No, because it would be dumb to do that through comment.
1992 Dream team
2008 Redeem team
................I didnt ask for his address.
No, because it would be dumb to do that through comment.
I also do not get the idea of where this 08 squad is such a defensive juggernaut.
Let’s look at the score of opposing teams vs. the US compared to their average scores vs. other opponents.
Vs. US vs. others
China 70 74 (73.25 in regulation)
Angola 76 61.25
Greece 69 86.5
Spain 82 84 (80.75 in regulation)
Germany 57 68.25
Australia 85 91.4
True that 08 does hold their opponent slightly below their average despite playing at a faster pace, but keep in mind you are comparing against teams that are much less talented than the US teams of both 92 and 08.
I didn’t do the 92 scores, because the 92 opponents were even worse than those who play now, and it would show no purpose but to show how much they sucked.
.......age is dumb though
The 92 dream team are full of old people now, i got the 2008 team.
THey were younger in 92
So was the 2008 team.
Id take the 92 team back then over the 2008 team back then.
Id take the 2008 team right now over the 92 team right now.
My vote goes to the '92 team because they were probably the best of their time. Or because my knowledge about those days are limited.
2008 is great. But there are other names that could've made them better.
I just wonder how you want to compare them?
basketball was different in 1992 - with the play of dream team and current Olympic squad I probably would choose redeem to ween!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions