Reply With Quote
So this is your idea of leaving me to troll? Not really good on follow through are you?
Typical.No, you whined about having me google "presidential poll" for you.brother I knew the answer before I even asked it.
How old are you?
how old are you again?
All this attention to Hillary Clinton is just a figment of my imagination. I understand, you are the truth, even over the DNC.You just took a chance to shoot off your mouth with claims having zero substance.
I love itI'll leave you to go yourself.
brother I knew the answer before I even asked it. You simply do not want to read, because why read when you know everything, right.The poll of more than 1,400 women voters quizzed during the first week of August found Obama ahead of John McCain by 12 percentage points.
So far, so good, from a Democratic point of view. Gore led in a similar survey by 9 points in June 2000; on election day, network exit polls showed him carrying the women's vote over George W. Bush by 11 points. Kerry led among these voters by a mere 1 point in a June survey when he ran for the presidency; he eventually won them by 3 points in his loss to Bush, according to the exit polls.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/wash...-obama-an.html
Choke on that, .
So this is your idea of leaving me to troll? Not really good on follow through are you?
Typical.No, you whined about having me google "presidential poll" for you.brother I knew the answer before I even asked it.
How old are you?
obsession with hillary?
even bill didn't have that.
yes because USA really would vote for black man at #1 and woman at #2
You don't want to take a job where if you die, a Clinton will replace you.
Dude just doesn't want to get capped in the back. I don't blame him.
Plus, he doesn't need Hillary for women. He'll throw on another Lifetime movie at the convention with his daughters again and get all the tears flowing.
Yes, the killer Clinton canard. Very Nbadanish of the board Republicans.
Hillary, while an excellent VP candidate was NOT the right choice this year. She would have mobilzed the anti-clinton republican conservative movement like no other. That is a fact that cannot be ignored. Get over it.
You don't think the conservative Republican movement will be mobilized anyway????????
It's a matter of degree. Clinton = more conservative mobilization as well as more independents for McCain. Whether those potential numbers are offset by colossally stupid, butthurt Clinton supporters remains to be seen.
Not from what I hear from those who don't like McCain but they realize he is the candidate of their party although they are FAR from thrilled about it.You don't think the conservative Republican movement will be mobilized anyway????????
I concur.
99% of the dialogue around the Biden pick has been related to how it helps or hurts Obama's chances of election. Barely a thing about what Biden might actually bring to the VP seat vs. Clinton. Maybe Biden was the better pick because of his tenure and foreign policy expertise. I don't know... Wishful thinking?
Hillary just ran a bad campaign in the beginning and really though she would catch Obama after he won all those smaller States. She simply under estimated the urgency of what people wanted. She'll run again.
Isn't it also possible that Hillary refused the nomination privately so as not to create a rift by publically refusing? We're assuming it wasn't offered to her and that she was interested, but how do we really know?
And you all seem to forget that Bill Clinton comes with Hillary and I feel there is some real bad blood between Bill and Barack.
Well, the way I see it is that half the democrats don't like a black man of power and half the democrats don't like a women of power. The crossover is about 75% wouldn't like that combination.
So according to your logic, all the Republicans oppose both blacks and women of power.Well, the way I see it is that half the democrats don't like a black man of power and half the democrats don't like a women of power.
The same could be said of Obama and some Democrats.
No. I specified democrats. They are the ones who are more bigoted statistically, even though they claim otherwise.
Hey, it's your logic, not mine.
How many women and blacks received delegates for the Republican nomination this year?
I don't know, but I'll bet there is a greater percentage of elected women in the republican party vs. the democrat party when looking at it from the perspective of how many run for office.
You see, less of the republican women run for office than democrat. More republican women are content with living the traditional role.
Look it up for me.How many women and blacks received delegates for the Republican nomination this year?
In fact, look up everything you just claimed and get back to me on that. It's about time you backed up something you just pulled out of your ass. You're the Galileo of the right.
Exactly. There is no perfect candidate.
Paging GGA and peewee . . .
That's not the major theme of this thread. I started to look up numbers, but didn't find the research already done, and I don't have that much time to spare. I can tell you from my experience of voting in Oregon, the republicans very seldom have women running, and many of them get elected. The democrats often have more women than men running for the same pos ion, but far less of the wins by percentage.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions