And just where do I say that?
I will say it is only cir strantial evidence. Now that it's been brought up, I say there is still no credible evidence against either president Bush or VP Cheney for an impeachment to pass.
My question was if there was even a law broken. WC was the one who jumped straight to an impeachment trial.
Now that there is an actual bidding process? They probably have more money to spend.Further, why is it the only deals involving Iraqi oil I have seen signed so far are the Chinese?
And just where do I say that?
I will say it is only cir strantial evidence. Now that it's been brought up, I say there is still no credible evidence against either president Bush or VP Cheney for an impeachment to pass.
You are the one who described it in terms used for trial evidence. You went straight to its admissibility in an impeachment trial when this is only an FIOA case.And just where do I say that?
Go back to measuring fonts with a ruler.
Sorry, I still don't see just a statement or close. Show me the exact quotes please.
Another baby that needs to be spoon fed -- his own ing words no less.
Oh My God. You really are a ing idiot!
Those words are far from limited to trial proceedings.
You're the guy arguing the evidence like it's a trial, counselor.
I object.
Sweet, got to work that in.
Son of a .
I move for a recess then because you guys are ing with me too much.
I need a new lawyer, either Kevin Costner in JFK or that blonde chick in Primal Fear.
Apparently there is no more usefulness to this thread. Wake me up when something important comes up.
Recess granted. Now go play.
Really though, was there usefulness to the thread in the first place?
I thought Wild Cobra's CSI-esque examination of the evidence was pretty entertaining.
Did you hear Carter call Obama a "black boy". Yeah he did it last night
on PBS. But it's okay, he is a liberal.![]()
I wasn't trying to be a smart ass with the first question. Just ask a question. If this was such an illegal thing (or true), you'd think the Demos would be having a field day with it.
But this doesn't make sense. Liberals keep screaming this was a war for Exxon's future profit margins...Now that there is an actual bidding process? They probably have more money to spend.
I'm sure more than that email would be needed to prove any impropriety. It's interesting to note the the information released through the FOIA case was a fraction of what Judicial Watch asked for.
True, one would think US companies would be gobbling up every available lease everywhere -- but they aren't. I heard a foreign company got one of the new leases for drilling off the Louisiana coast. I'm not sure why they would let that one go after demanding for more leases.But this doesn't make sense. Liberals keep screaming this was a war for Exxon's future profit margins...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)