Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 30 of 30
  1. #26
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    2,681
    The only guy we can get for Matt Bonner is Brian Scalabrine


    I wonder if Boston Celtic forums are as obsessed with trading Scalabrine as this one is with trading Bonner? I don't think any team would even trade a 2nd round pick for Bonner. At this point, the rights to #57 James Gist are more valuable trade fodder than Bonner.

  2. #27
    Optomistic but Realistic MrChug's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    3,203
    Let's face it...we've dug ourselves a big hole by going "all in" with #21, #20, #12 and #9 (our "core group of players") BET THE HOUSE ON THAT HOLE and have since only filled it with to save a buck. I'm no longer optomistic.

  3. #28
    Habeeb it! completely deck's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Post Count
    1,481
    Let's face it...we've dug ourselves a big hole by going "all in" with #21, #20, #12 and #9 (our "core group of players") BET THE HOUSE ON THAT HOLE and have since only filled it with to save a buck. I'm no longer optomistic.
    Yeah, I have no idea what they were thinking especially after winning those les...

  4. #29
    Ruffy RuffnReadyOzStyle's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    24,209
    Let's face it...we've dug ourselves a big hole by going "all in" with #21, #20, #12 and #9 (our "core group of players") BET THE HOUSE ON THAT HOLE and have since only filled it with to save a buck. I'm no longer optomistic.
    ...and you've forgotten about the 3 les along the way, and the 2010 plan. Hey, I hate the 2010 plan, I'd like to see us going all-out now, but there is a scheme to it all.

  5. #30
    Optomistic but Realistic MrChug's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    3,203
    ...and you've forgotten about the 3 les along the way, and the 2010 plan. Hey, I hate the 2010 plan, I'd like to see us going all-out now, but there is a scheme to it all.
    I'll ignore the ignoramus above but I've paid appropriate attention to your logic in the past. MARK THIS: When we actually make the supreme "get us back on track" move in 2010 (which had better be stupendous) OR we are back to contention "form", then not only will I EAT the crow and BBQ it, I'll HAVE the BBQ and cook for all. If not...it's on you.

    Just remember, there was a "Master Plan 2008" too.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •