Sarah Palin is the mother of Trig. I want to know who the mother of Calculus is.
His father was a philandering, wandering man. No one disputes this, I don't believe. Hey, there's a reason Obama was raised by a single mother.
The Buchenwald/Birkenau slip has been addressed. His uncle, who was at Buchenwald, was introduced during John Kerry's speech at the convention.
Sarah Palin is the mother of Trig. I want to know who the mother of Calculus is.
I'm not ashamed of being a Democrat at all but yeah, thedailykos, moveon.org give democrats a bad name and I don't agree with that crap. But the far right also make republicans look like idiots. Hannity and Limpbaugh and Savage do them injustice as well but I do listen to them. William Bennett is a guy I like though. He is the fairest of the them all, IMO.
Fletch Lives....anyone....anyone.....Calculus Entropy: How do you do? I be Calculus Entropy, you be Mr. and Mrs. Fletcher?
Fletch: I be Fletch, Geometry Fletch. She be Miss Trigonometry Ross.![]()
Ignignokt, why do you waste the effort on these guys? Have you seen anything from them to indicate they are worthy of that effort? Do you honestly expect any sort of concession from them or admission they are wrong?
These are people that overlook churches being burnt down, they overlook comedians making jokes about her being raped, they overlook attacks on children.
They tell you, this mother of children, she should evidentally not let her children be seen in public if she is running for office, otherwise the attacks are fair game.
I mean did you or did you not see whinehole pointing out that the difference between Obama and Palin(and why he doesn't really have to hide his children) is because, no one goes after his children?
That is the stupidest statement since Patrick Ewing said sure we make a lot of money, but we spend a lot of money.
She brings her children out on stage like every other Presidential or VP candidate in history and all of sudden she's using them for political advantage, props.
Why in the world do you consider them worth the effort of a legitimate attempt at discourse?
They're total ing s and they literally don't give a about anything but their political party and maintaining it's hold on power, at pretty much any cost.
Since you really want to do this...I'll PM you some links...
I'll even PM you my my supersecret info on Palin's international experience as Governor of Russia.
Ha!
I remember so many college students being "birthers" around election time. Infact there was a whole youth voter turnout over this, and many people believed these rumors to be true.
While the mainstream media didn't take side on the issue, whenever it was brought up, they didn't make any effort to publically disclaim it, they would leave it as "rumors" the palins and the McCain campaign are fighting.
I didn't say that. I said it showed bad judgment.They tell you, this mother of children, she should evidentally not let her children be seen in public if she is running for office, otherwise the attacks are fair game.
Another misrepresentation. Why can't you play it straight whottt?I mean did you or did you not see whinehole pointing out that the difference between Obama and Palin(and why he doesn't really have to hide his children) is because, no one goes after his children?
I said no one goes after Obama's kids because of racial sensitivity, and because there's no story there.
I also blamed McCain for tapping a nationally unknown figure for his VP without doing his due diligence and preparing the ground. He's as much to blame for the media storm around Palin as anybody.
Correction, the youth voter turnout was not solely based on the birther conspiracy but had a role in discreditting Palin.
I couldn't provide the link to the Daily Kos article, it's no longer there.
No, the people that go after her kids are the ones to blme for going after her kids, 100%, them, and those that remain silent because it suits their political agenda.
No . I knew that hours ago when I dug up the Andrew Sullivan blog. The link to the original was there too.
The media that didn't run with it were in on it too!![]()
It suited their political agenda not to report on it!
Widespread!
Nonstop!
24/7!
![]()
It probably suits their agenda to not be sued for libel by continuing to have 100% proven beyond all doubt libelous claims floating around on their sites.
That said...the articles and broadcasts you seek are out there. I just don't consider you worth the effort of posting them.
I mean, you think it's ok to go after children.
I don't. And you can't back it up.
Why can't you play it straight, whottt?
Ah, the Wild Cobra "you're not worthy of getting any proof from me (good lord I can't find anything to back myself up)" gambit.
Well played.
In other words, you hold it against media outlets that practiced responsible journalism from a well-founded concern about printing libel or slander. In your mind, doing the responsible thing and not running the story... proves their mens rea. Classic!
Or did you just universalize the Kos scrub?
Um...I consider pretty much every major media outlet in the country to be a partisan blog, I don't think they practice good journalism, that said, our beautiful girl Sarah likes green as much as the next guy and I don't think they're stupid enough to offer it up to her on a silver platter.
It's libel you see, in this case it would be completely stupid libel.
That said, the links are out there...if you are so unbiased post them. Prove you merit a civil discussion.
I already backed myself up...I did so with this thread. I know I know...but it's biased.
"Post the links you asked me to post."
This is good. Right up there with your super secret international Palin duties that you never posted.
Post them, whottt. Prove to us you're not the Augean stables.
No, it's just the worst argument you have ever adopted on this board.
"You asked me for links, so you go find those links you asked me for."
This is just sad.
I'd be willing to bet money you won't.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)