Not surprised, but if Obama wants to capitalize on this he needs to start pointing out the obvious lies. I just don't get why he hasn't gone on the offensive yet.
Latest attempt by the sexist liberal left to smear the most qualified candidate we've seen in decades -
Out of the 12 most recent articles on FactCheck's home page 9 are related to McCain/Palin speeches or ads by the McCain campaign.
Last edited by Mr. Peabody; 09-13-2008 at 02:22 PM.
Not surprised, but if Obama wants to capitalize on this he needs to start pointing out the obvious lies. I just don't get why he hasn't gone on the offensive yet.
because people aren't republicans due to integrity. truth doesn't matter.
Integrity = making ads mocking the injuries an American solider suffered while being torturedbecause people aren't republicans due to integrity.
They need ads like this -
Not like this -
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...ing_palin.html
* Palin did not cut funding for special needs education in Alaska by 62 percent. She didn’t cut it at all. In fact, she increased funding and signed a bill that will triple per-pupil funding over three years for special needs students with high-cost requirements.
* She did not demand that books be banned from the Wasilla library. Some of the books on a widely circulated list were not even in print at the time. The librarian has said Palin asked a "What if?" question, but the librarian continued in her job through most of Palin's first term.
* She was never a member of the Alaskan Independence Party, a group that wants Alaskans to vote on whether they wish to secede from the United States. She’s been registered as a Republican since May 1982.
* Palin never endorsed or supported Pat Buchanan for president. She once wore a Buchanan button as a "courtesy" when he visited Wasilla, but shortly afterward she was appointed to co-chair of the campaign of Steve Forbes in the state.
* Palin has not pushed for teaching creationism in Alaska's schools. She has said that students should be allowed to "debate both sides" of the evolution question, but she also said creationism "doesn't have to be part of the curriculum
of course it does. republicans made torture cool. did you forget that?
I remember McCain being outspoken against torture, going against the leadership of his own party.
Now I see that Obama thinks it's cool to laugh at torture. New politics, hein? Classy guy, indeed.
Which one of these was in an Obama/Biden speech or in an Obama/Biden ad? You can look, but the answer is NONE.
![]()
Last edited by Mr. Peabody; 09-13-2008 at 02:56 PM.
I remember that too. What happened?
Are you using a Jonathan Adler article to make an argument? Really?
Do you think the others are stupid? Adler? What's next? DailyKos? Andrew Sullivan? Axelrod? Geezz...
Explain us this: why should the CIA use the same rules of the Army when it comes to question prisoners? Do you know those rules? Not even the police has so strict rules. They wouldn't be able to make someone the same promises every public attorney makes daily to get information. It'd be utterly insane.
McCain admitted in an interview that he doesn't use computers, know how, or care to learn.
Obama criticizing him for this is not criticizing him for his war injuries. He's criticizing him because he doesn't know how to ing use a computer. And yes, last I checked McCain still has hands and a voice......he can operate a computer.
In certain ways, McCain was a natural Web candidate. Chairman of the Senate Telecommunications Subcommittee and regarded as the U.S. Senate’s savviest technologist, McCain is an inveterate devotee of email. His nightly ritual is to read his email together with his wife, Cindy. The injuries he incurred as a Vietnam POW make it painful for McCain to type. Instead, he dictates responses that his wife types on a laptop.
FORBES MAGAZINE,
http://graphics.boston.com/news/poli...a_fault+.shtmlMcCain gets emotional at the mention of military families needing food stamps or veterans lacking health care. The outrage comes from inside: McCain’s severe war injuries prevent him from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes
IMO; this is not even political. It's a matter of respect for a fellow human being.
How far is too far? When even Rove says your a lier
The McCain campaign is lying so much right now. The last couple of weeks of ads and statements have been incredibly over the top. I don't expect the American people to notice though.
When she could pull herself away from keeping an eye on the big, bad Russian bear from backyard, her single globe-trotting tour (she didn't want to be seen as too "cosmopolitain" by by transves e Julie -Annie), the pitbull lied about visiting Ireland and Iraq:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the...visit_ira.html
Mitt Romney on McSame
It's the same old campaign tricks that propelled a damaged administration to victory in 04 and some people are falling for it again - lock, stock and barrel.....it's really a sad situation our country is in and I lay much of the blame on our worthless corporate media - clearly they have a agenda to keep the American people dumb with worthless news like Obama calling Palin a lipstick pig to try and wear people's political patience...
A liar looks ’em in the eye
And lies to a woman,
Lies to a man, a pal, a child, a fool.
And he is an old liar; we know him many years back.
A liar lies to nations.
A liar lies to the people.
A liar takes the blood of the people
And drinks this blood with a laugh and a lie,
A laugh in his neck,
A lie in his mouth.
And this liar is an old one; we know him many years….
- Carl Sandburg
Sarah Palin’s foreign policy credentials may be pretty thin, but at least they’re bolstered by the fact that as governor, she spent some time in Iraq visiting members of the Alaska National Guard.
What’s that?
Oh. Well, the Boston Globe now reports that Palin never visited Iraq, that the closest she got was the Iraq-Kuwait border, and from there she could see INTO Iraq. Kind of like being a Russia expert because you can see it from a couple of Alaskan islands.
But at least Palin “knows more about energy than probably anyone else in the United States of America,” according to John McCain. As Palin herself says, and as McCain repeats, she comes from Alaska, which provides 20 percent of the nation’s domestic energy.
What’s that?
Oh. Factcheck.org says “Alaska’s share of domestic energy production was 3.5 percent, according to the official figures kept by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.” But hey, what does the Energy Information Administration know co mpared to the person who “knows more about energy than probably anyone else in the United States of America.”
Well, at least the McCain/Palin ticket is drawing a lot of folks to rallies. According to Bloomberg news, “McCain aide Kimmie Lipscomb told reporters on Sept. 10 that an outdoor rally in Fairfax City, Virginia, drew 23,000 people, attributing the crowd estimate to a fire marshal.”
What’s that?
Oh. Fairfax City Fire Marshal Andrew Wilson now says his office did not supply that number to the campaign and could not confirm it. Independent estimates had put the number at 8,000.
Oh, well, at least they did draw 10,000 people to the Consol Energy Arena in Washington, Pennsylvania. That must be a solid number, because the McCain camp says it came from the Secret Service, based on the number of people who passed through magnetometers.
What’s that?
Oh. “We didn’t provide any numbers to the campaign,” Malcolm Wiley, a spokesman for the Secret Service, told Bloomberg, saying he could neither confirm nor deny the crowd estimate.
Well, who cares about that stuff. The Obama campaign shouldn’t be picking on Palin anyway. In fact, the McCain-Palin campaign has released a new TV ad that pointing out that Obama is being “disrespectful” toward Palin.
What’s that?
Oh. According to Factcheck, the ad “distorts quotes from the Obama campaign. It takes words out of context to make it sound as though the Democratic ticket is belittling Palin.” For example:
“The ad says ‘they said she was doing ‘what she was told’.’ But the Obama adviser who’s being quoted didn’t accuse Palin of meekly following orders. What he actually said is that she made a false claim about Obama’s legislative record and added, “maybe that’s what she was told.”
Oh, and Palin is back to lying again about the Bridge to Nowhere, falsely claiming against overwhelming do entary evidence that “I told Congress thanks but no thanks to that Bridge to Nowhere,” as she said in a speech in Nevada this weekend.
They know that the majority of voters don't read sites like factcheck.org, so they're not going to stop. Barack needs to to take it up a few notches and start fighting back. He's made a few comments about their lies, but it's not enough.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)