well you're a ing dumbass then.
haha yeah... I'm sure if he was there he would've stopped them both from doing all the damage they did..
I mean it's not like they haven't done it before on the colts...
was he injured then?
I know you're butt hurt but as you get older you'll realize that this kind of thing happens... you even predicted they were going to lose... or atleast that's what I got from whatever you told timvp, why are you crying?
who's crying?
you're wrong if you're gonna sit there and say he doesn't make a difference. He's one of a very few defensive players in the league who can turn a defense around. See the Colts superbowl run a few years ago.
Go look at the Colts Jags game a few years ago when they ran for 300+ yards and won 44-17. Who didn't play in that game?
Anyways, back to calling you a dumbass because it's obvious you are if you say he wasn't gonna make a difference.
I guess you're right...I mean, sure, there are starters, 2nd string, 3rd string, etc...but really, they're all equal.
wow. I mean, I will agree that the colts have problems stopping the run, but still...if you think Sanders wouldn't be a help to this team, you're delusional.
Just saw the highlights on NBC. Showing all the Jag's runs Dan Patrick mentioned Bob Sanders wasn't playing. Now why would he say something like that, knowing he wasn't gonna make a difference?
sanders os going to be out 4-5 more weeks
We realize that, but thanks for the reminder.
Where was the pass interference on that play that went against Indy?
Nice game to watch. With my newbie European eye, I don't find that defense against the run was the problem for Indiana.
Aside from eating the clock, Jaguars running offense didn't do a lot of things. They only scored 1 TD and 2 FGs with it.
The problem was that Colts' offense wasn't clicking.
The Colt's offense couldn't start clicking because like you said the Jags ate the clock up. Colts only had the ball for about 19 minutes...only 4 in the second half.
Well... let's see... if your a team you have to be prepared if you need 3rd stringers right?I guess you're right...I mean, sure, there are starters, 2nd string, 3rd string, etc...but really, they're all equal.
and aren't they just as part of the team as starters? That's what I said about difference.. I referred to what you said, not what the difference was between skill...
Because 3rd stringers even if bad are part of the team, and I said the team was bad so I guess the statement made some sense..
So are you saying if Sanders played the Colts would've won?
it's a big IF. I didn't say he doesn't help, he obviously does.. I just don't think he would've changed the outcome of the game..
Sanders makes a HUGE difference for the defense...sure, it's possible the Colts would've won if he would've played.
You make it sound as though the Colts got blown out or something.
The clock wasn't managed well at the end...that was the biggest problem to close that game out.
But anyway, to assume that Sanders wouldn't make a difference is wrong.
That's like saying if Manu was 100 percent I'd guarantee the Spurs would've beaten the Lakers, there's just things you don't know... so I'm going by what I saw, and clearly the Jags were a better team...
I'm not only talking about this game as far as how I see the team, I saw the other two games and it's been that bad
Except that I never "guaranteed" a win if Sanders was in there.
He would've made a difference on defense. Whether that would have brought a win, we'll never know.
Do I speak a language not spoken by others or something?
In the political forum yesterday, people were twisting my words and putting word in my mouth...
Then Manny comes in and says EXACTLY what I was saying, and the response to him was, "Good point!"
Geez...and now tonight.
I never said the Colts would've definitely won. I said that Sanders would've made a difference on defense.
The way you make fun of my opinion makes it seem that way.
I'm not "making fun" of your opinion, I'm disagreeing.
Not just that one... my other opinion that the Colts were not a good team as of now...
lol but they are that... opinions.. except that you as a fan think differently, and I'm going by what I'm currently seeing and well the stats.
but it's all good... atleast we're both Cowboys fans
common ground
What cost the Colts this game was stupid playcalling in after the Reggie Wayne reception that went to the 2 yard line. Two incomplete passes in a row took next to nothing off of the clock. Almost as embarrassing as the "let's try to draw the Chargers offsides" thing last season that pushed Vinatieri back just enough to miss a short FG.
I think the Colts are done. Hope not, I'm a big time Peyton fan, but I don't see it anymore.
The are down, but I wouldn't count them out.
With the Pats and Colts hurting, is there really any team in the AFC that is heads above all the rest?
All teams seem fairly equal in this Conference.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote