Wright - Obama - Ayers (peas in a pod)

[ChumpDumper]

You guys are trying to make this the main issue of the presidential campaign.

Why?

[Shastafarian]

I don't know what to think of the relationship, frankly.

It seems there is more there than has been admitted to. Whenever somebody is trying to hide something, it arouses su ion.

Wright and Ayers are both extremists. They have espoused, and in Ayers case, acted on those views. They are both unapologetic about their past. Obama has described Ayers, "Just a guy from the neighborhood," when, in fact, their relationship seems to be more significant than that.

What conclusion do I draw from this? Simply that Obama is not probably not being honest about his relationship with Ayers. The question that raises is, why?

Yet you completely dismiss Palin's whole troopergate mess?

I don't know either what their real relationship is. But don't you think any number of the conservative media would've found something concrete by now? It's possible he's just distancing himself from Ayers. It's possible they're friends. But do you really think they're anymore than friends? I'm more concerned about his and McCain's affiliations with lobbyists of any sort.

[Wild Cobra]

I'm not sure where you get your fancy-pants dictionaries but none of mine have pictures. I have a Webster's right in front of me. Lemme look....nope no pictures.

My God man...

Most of my dictionaries have pictures and/or illustrations. Even my 1906!

[Shastafarian]

My God man...

Most of my dictionaries have pictures and/or illustrations. Even my 1906!

What dictionaries are they?!?!? I'm pretty intrigued.

[101A]

Yet you completely dismiss Palin's whole troopergate mess?

No.

I fully expect that she did, in fact, try to get her asshole brother in law fired.

It was an "abuse of power".

I don't have a problem with it - but she can't cop to it because she would lose her job as Alaska's governor.

Dude should have been fired. The guy who didn't fire him should have been fired.

[Wild Cobra]

What dictionaries are they?!?!? I'm pretty intrigued.

I'm not going to make a list. I have several different dictionaries from different timeframes. A 1906, 1936, 194osomething, 1960something, 1974, 1989, 1996, etc. I thnk only the 1974 lacks pictures.

[Shastafarian]

I'm not going to make a list. I have several different dictionaries from different timeframes. A 1906, 1936, 194osomething, 1960something, 1974, 1989, 1996, etc. I thnk only the 1974 lacks pictures.

No I mean which dictionaries. Webster's?

[Wild Cobra]

No I mean which dictionaries. Webster's?

At least two of them are, including the 1906.

Why is this important?

[Shastafarian]

At least two of them are, including the 1906.

Why is this important?

I'm curious. None of the dictionaries I have are laden with pictures. Also you brought it back up.

[Yonivore]

Obama-Ayers: Partners in Revolution

More questions...

[ChumpDumper]

Pretty much the same questions in a different blog.

Seriously, what is the point here?

[Yonivore]

I have no idea what you posted but, thanks for bumping, Spunkmeister.

[ChumpDumper]

Ah the old "not ignoring me by saying you are ignoring me" schtick. Nice to know you are still too cowardly to deal with me directly.

I said this is as ineffective as anything else that has been posted about Ayers.

And now I'm saying if you post about me again, you're the biggest on the internets.

[Yonivore]

It's a beautiful thing.