yoni and wc march lock-step ideologicially with whatever businesses/Repugs/neo-c*nts/conservatives' talking points are. The points say 'deny global warming", or Palin is wonderful, and yoni and wc fall right into step.
Hey WC, did you see this little article. It always amazes me how the
media can ignore facts and print BS. And people like Shastafarian
continues to believe the BS and ignore facts. Oh, well.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/dan-gai...ce-still-there
yoni and wc march lock-step ideologicially with whatever businesses/Repugs/neo-c*nts/conservatives' talking points are. The points say 'deny global warming", or Palin is wonderful, and yoni and wc fall right into step.
Ray do you think man is contributing to the warming of earth? Is warming bad for planet earth? If man is contributing to something bad to the planet shouldn't they do something about it?
Pretty simple debate.
I gave up after MY GOD MAN asked me a math question. Trying to convince these people is an exercise in futility.
I don't.
Not as bad as cooling.
Yep.
And, yep.
Try facts, sourced and corroborated facts. That's how you convince people.
SO warming is bad, just not s bad as cooling. If man contributes to warming they shouldn't do anything about it. OK.
Or a rightwinger's blog..
I don't agree man is contributing anything to global climate.
Here you want a relatively layman paper on the matter?
A Slippery Slope: How Much Global Warming Cons utes
“Dangerous Anthropogenic Interference”?
by James Hansen
And if your wrong?
Nope, it's an editorial essay. An opinion, in other words.
We don't go bankrupt while we watch the growing seasons increase globally.
Yes but he cites several studies and their findings.
And opines on them. If the studies he cites prove your point, post them. I already know Hansen's position.
Nice article. Here is the computer composite of daily satellite readings on the Actic cap:
![]()
One of us might be.
Global surface temperature increased in the past century by 0.5°C (1, 2). This warming is, at least in part, a result of anthropogenic climate-forcing agents (3).
A climate forcing is an imposed, natural or anthropogenic, perturbation of the Earth’s energy balance with space (4, 5). Increasing anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) cause the largest positive (warming) forcing. Aerosols are also a major climate forcing, but they are not well measured. Aerosols are increasing in some regions but decreasing in others (3, 6), so continued growth of GHGs is likely to provide the predominant global anthropogenic climate forcing in the 21st century.
You know how to say a whole lot of nothing in a big paragraph. Thanks for the definition of global warming.
An unproven assertion.
Again, no one -- NO ONE -- has shown anthropogenic climate changes have, or even, could occur.
The "paragraph" claims we are at least partially responsible for the warming. You would rather I post the entire article?
Please humor me. Do the math on the numbers I gave a few posts back.
Now, ask him to explain why the climate has been cooling since 1998.
UUUUGGGHHHHHHH FATHER!!! FFAAAATTTTTHHHHEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)