The beauty of whottt is that he's ambiguous in his idiocy.
The beauty of whottt is that he's ambiguous in his idiocy.
Seriously. That was classic.
Ooh man that's some gold.
Going to the siggy too.
Keep it up.
Sometimes I think whottt is just having a good laugh at everybody's expense.
I said his endorsement was ...there are several ways of interpreting that statement, you have a very limited number of interpretations of that statement and you attribute that to a lack of intelligence on my part...
Trust me...the lack of intelligence is entirely on your part.
There was nothing in that statement about votes...it was very open ended statement that could be interprested several ways, and you are simply ignorant every way of interpreting it but one.
You remain ignorant and locked into a narrow interpretion of my original statement...even after I clarified it.
Last edited by whottt; 09-26-2008 at 02:28 PM.
See. Ambiguous Idiocy. Not sure what "interpretion" is either.
OK whottt whatever you say![]()
Saying his endorsement is doesn't mean it doesn't carry any weight.![]()
You're not the idiot everybody else is. I couldn't have made this up if I tried. You should have ran as a repub for some type of office. You fight right in with all of them.
will you please shut the up because you have no idea what you're talking about.
you and your only get to write off basis, capital gains tax on income stupidity.
![]()
If whottt is ambiguous enough he could claim he said anything.
Brilliant!!!
![]()
It's clever sure. But again, whottt is not as smart as he thinks he is.
I even clarified it...and you still filtered it through your limited perception.
Trust me...you are the one with the limited mental capcity in this discussion...not I.
You're not the idiot everybody else is.I agree with that to an extent.
But you did make it up...you made it up entirely. Whether you were trying or not.I couldn't have made this up if I tried.
That is exactly what you did.
You did it, even after I clarified the statement.
And you fit right in with the rest of the libs of extremely limited intellect that think their lack of perspective is a sign of intelligence.You should have ran as a repub for some type of office. You fight right in with all of them.
Let's say I am ambiguous...not saying for certain than I am, but let's just say for the sake of argument that perhaps I do it intentionally...
Wouldn't that mean that the way you elect to interpret my statements says more about you than it does about me?
OK whottt I'll give you another chance. How exactly did you clarify the statement?
This should be a good one....
BTW, I don't like calling myself ambiguous...I prefer the term idiot magnet.
It's a brilliant tactic, I've already admitted it. That is if you wanna be an ambiguous ass that nobody takes seriously.
And yes when somebody says a persons opinion is it usually means to me that it holds very little or no value. I guess that's just my own biases showing.....
It means he's full of . I already said it...
He is simply full of .
How much clearer can I make it?
Touche![]()
They do flock to your defense. Although not in this thread. Maybe they caught on to your game.![]()
![]()
Tully was inclinded to make the same conclusion you did...but he at least asked.
Well obviously the said opinion doesn't carry much weight with the person saying it is .And yes when somebody says a persons opinion is it usually means to me that it holds very little or no value. I guess that's just my own biases showing.....
There is nothing in that statement to indicate whether or not the sayer thinks anyone else will feel similarly...
So his opinion that Obama would make a better president (that's what endorsing means whottt) is full of . (because he said it and he's full of ) Is different than his opinion on that subject (because that's what we were talking about) is . OK whottt I think I got that, thanks for clearing that up for me and everybody else. Try not to chew any gum while crossing the street today.
OK whottt we're going in circles now.![]()
![]()
![]()
There you go with another limited interpretation.
And you were showing such potential.
Sigh, we're not going in circles. You're going in circles.
Obviously I feel that way.
(because he said it and he's full of ) Is different than his opinion on that subject (because that's what we were talking about) is . OK whottt I think I got that, thanks for clearing that up for me and everybody else. Try not to chew any gum while crossing the street today.
Priceless.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)