Reply With Quote
God you are such a prick.
Um...America has never been a far left country, EVER. So I have difficult time believing that is the country you love.
God you are such a prick.
Stay classy, whot.
This is like saying, "You stay pure, Paris Hilton".
"Shut the up boutons."
make me, you less, fake-macho chicken
Or "You stay even-tempered and cool under fire, Senator McCain."
Seriously, what the is your problem? Are you just petulant because the writing is on the wall?
Barack Obama plays basketball. Charles Barkley plays basketball. Is Charles Barkley qualified to run our economy? He lost millions gambling in Las Vegas. Don't let Barack Obama gamble with our economy.
He's the one trolling behind his service...not me.
But anyway...
State Controlled Media is what makes America great. Right on!
I can just imagine your reaction if some liberal jumped a vet for loving his "right-wing, fascist" America because of his service in Iraq.
You go ahead and imgaine it all you want...after all, I'm the one that uses strawmen right?
Patriotism doesn't belong to any political party or philosophy. It's repugnant to wrap yourself in the flag to attack others.
anyone who votes for mccain should have to ride the short bus to work and take counseling
he came across as so ignorant last night in the debate, got completely owned, and couldn't even make eye contact with obama
And then there are the idiots LEFT behind.
That believe:
1) Any war is a good war.
2) Any media that doesn't reports facts that agree with their myopic views is liberal-biased.
3) Any government regulation is bad (no food safety, no workplace safety, polluted air and water, de-regulated banks).
4) Lobbyists should be appointed where possible to facilitate "bidness."
5) This is a Christian nation and we should have our version of sharia-type laws to govern it by.
So are you conceding defeat whottt?
for someone so ignorant Obama sure did agree with him...often.
The it doesn't.
It's repugnant to wrap yourself in the flag to attack others.
It's repugnant to call fear, ambivalence and indifference liberalism.
It was a campaign tactic (not strategy) that I don't think says much of anything about his diplomatic skills. But you're en led to your opinion.
I'm actually putting little stock in his overall campaigning because he frankly sucks at it (see McCain v2000). Most of the decisions he's made to this point have been to his detriment, yet he still finds himself in the running.
It's because he's a good man who has conviction and votes his conscience regardless of political ramification....that's admirable and voteworthy.
That and I also happen to agree with him on most of his positions.
You can find fault with his appearance or perceived at ude if you'd like though. That's what I love about this country.
A good man yes. No question. Honest intentions, absolutely.
Still I think his approach to foreign policy is fundamentally wrong. By all accounts he is more hawkish than Bush. That approach just doesn't work in the 21st century. We have to work to find common ground, even with our enemies, because pure silence only exacerbates the problem.
I believe Obama will do a better job of repairing our reputation around the world and getting leaders of countries we are in disagreement with to compromise.
What I am going to enjoy is to see the whotts and yonis of the world moan and groan for 8 yrs....
If Obama truly brings the change he has talked about bringing, they won't be the only two.
Oh I know! Stop teasing me!
I think his military background and tough talk on Iran give the perception that he's a hawk, but I'm not sure I'd call him "more hawkish than Bush".
In truth, the military actually teaches the use of social, economic and political leverage when dealing with enemies. They also teach about military history and learning lessons from past conflicts. In fact, McCain is intimately familiar with one of the more failed policies of an administration and how it cost the lives of many service men and women.
Given that, I just find it hard to believe he would foolishly rush into a conflict (a la Bush) without considering all available options and the consequences.
But I can certainly see how the perception of the two differs and agree that Obama would probably be viewed by the world as the better diplomat.
Agree also having to drop Reagan's name 3 or 4 times is weak. McCain just kept repeating the same things over and over and his lack of ability to meet with those he may disagree with is not a positive thing. A president has to have the ability to be tough at times but he also has to be more flexible than what McCain showed he would be.
No doubt Obama is the more intelligent man.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions