Betting his IQ doesn't touch Hillary's, and certainly not Bills - at least there is no evidence it does.
Not just the Republicans.
The Dems couldn't touch him, either.
Svengali?
McCain picked Palin.
He really sucks at this.
Betting his IQ doesn't touch Hillary's, and certainly not Bills - at least there is no evidence it does.
Not just the Republicans.
The Dems couldn't touch him, either.
Svengali?
Oh .
World Unity?
Are you serious? THAT NAIVE???? Each country is going to look out for #1; make no mistake. I'm afraid with Obama, we might be taking urugula to a gun fight - and that's just with our allies!
There is no evidence it doesn't either. Now if you made the Harvard Law Review you could tell me all about how smart you had to be.
None of that made any sense. Use your words.Not just the Republicans.
The Dems couldn't touch him, either.
Svengali?
so thats why you about other countries. you don't trust them. but you trust your own. THAT NAIVE????
not to mention other countries own our ass. THAT NAIVE????
Harvard doesn't release statistics on grades/LSAT's for anything outside of the middle 50th percentile. No way of knowing how low the standard is for an African American. I'd be willing to be my undergrad would be compe ive with Barrack's, however. Have no way of knowing. Harvard Law Review is an elected position within the School now; it used to hold academic requirements; it no longer does. Obama is apparently the ONLY editor to not clerk for a judge, however. We don't know why he holds this distinction.
You remarked that Obama is only leading because the Republicans picked such a weak candidate in McCain. Well, a whole bunch of Democrats also lost to him Were they all lesser candidates, as well?None of that made any sense. Use your words.
Ah, the old all blacks are affirmative action cases. How delightfully prejudiced of you!Now you sound like Wild Cobra. Keep it up!I'd be willing to be my undergrad would be compe ive with Barrack's, however.And none of that has anything to do with Obama's intelligence.Have no way of knowing. Harvard Law Review is an elected position within the School now; it used to hold academic requirements; it no longer does. Obama is apparently the ONLY editor to not clerk for a judge, however. We don't know why he holds this distinction.
Clinton was complacent, and she was the only serious compe ion. Obama outsmarted her.You remarked that Obama is only leading because the Republicans picked such a weak candidate in McCain. Well, a whole bunch of Democrats also lost to him Were they all lesser candidates, as well?
Heh.
There's your evidence.
I don't trust my own govt. that's for damn sure; but it is the only one I've got. And I certainly don't see it as some kind of all important goal to sing kum-ba-ya with my fellow travelers on this rock.
I simply can't believe, that in a thread where I have requested Obama's credentials to be president the ONLY arguments thus far has been, "The rest of th World likes him." and "He's not John McCain".
Great. Woot ing woot. Barrack On.
...and you sarcastically brought up my non-admission to the law review because?
Clinton was complacent, and she was the only serious compe ion. Obama outsmarted her.
Heh.[/quote]
Obama's campaign, and a media with an agenda, outsmarted her.
I find it hilarious that everybody here thinks the Tina Fey as Palin SNL is so spot on and relevent, but don't remember what they had to say about Obama and his treatment just a few months ago.
so, you think it's about singing a song? how profound. those "travelers" of which you speak own the part of "the rock" you're standing on.
I didn't know you were Harvard Law in the first place. Tell us about how smart you were to get in there.
He was very smart to surround himself with such competent campaign people. Get over it, Wild 101Abra. He's better than you.Obama's campaign, and a media with an agenda, outsmarted her.
They were probably spot on then too. I don't watch SNL, but I watch the YouTubes if they are posted. The funniest thing about Fey's Palin bit was when she gave a Palin line verbatim. That was funnier than anything she could have written.I find it hilarious that everybody here thinks the Tina Fey as Palin SNL is so spot on and relevent, but don't remember what they had to say about Obama and his treatment just a few months ago.
This pretty much sums up the intelligence of the average voter - how scary is that?!I find it hilarious that everybody here thinks the Tina Fey as Palin SNL is so spot on and relevent, but don't remember what they had to say about Obama and his treatment just a few months ago.
being capable of ignoring the last 8 years up to today - how scary is that?
This is a flat out lie.
It's hilarious to see the incredible lengths you go to try you make yourself think you are better than Obama.
This is unbelievable. You think Barack Obama has an average or below average intelligence? You think the black man got into Harvard and became president Of the Harvard Law Review while being unintelligent? You think he was a professor of cons utional law while being unintelligent?
I'm not going to justify this by giving you more ways to show Barack's intelligence. Whether you choose to believe he's the best candidate for President or not questioning his intelligence is a ridiculous.
Wild 101Abra is also a Senator and was a professor at a prestigious law school, so you can shut the up.
He's obviously intelligent. He just hasn't done much of anything besides give speeches and write books. Am I being unfair?
Yet we've got a page of posts questioning that very trait. Its ing idiotic or simply disingenuous to sit here and post that he's anything but very intelligent.
And yes, your second statement is both inaccurate and unfair.
i don't remember seeing anyone question his intelligence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jj4VK9wVAi0
So you're either blind or have no short term memory.
they must've been said by the people i normally ignore. i see them question ability not intelligence.
So you have 101A on ignore?
OK.
i posted "ignore" not "on ignore". i don't need a silly program to shut out people i don't agree with. i hear both sides
How do you hear both sides if you ignore so many people?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)